HOME | DD

balaa β€” Persistence of Memory

Published: 2012-05-19 00:37:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 44019; Favourites: 3929; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description "The sand comes in undulating whispers, serpentine lines consuming memory and becoming a single sweeping timeless thought. But she too comes with the sand, a lingering persistent memory marking this place in time. And then she departs as silent as she came with only the light to mark her passage; A mirage, a feeling, folded into the cavalcade of sand."

*~~~~*

This piece was done on commission for the lovely Digital Artist Magazine who gave me the fantastic opportunity to write an article for the magazine detailing my process. The editor was simply outstanding and really welcoming of my ideas. And by heck I learned a lot myself doing this!

This was an idea that had been bobbling about in my head for a long time, though it's various forms all vague and nebulous until this opportunity presented itself. I truly hope someone walks away from the article learning something or even moreso..feeling inspired to create something!

The idea is inspired, in part, by imagery of a town in the Namib desert called Kolmanskop that is slowly being devoured by the surrounding desert. For me it presents an eerie and unsettling feeling because I am so used to seeing more ancient looking buildings in such scenarios, but the buildings in the town are fairly modern thus leading to the haunting feeling. The second idea is images I have come across to what is, at least from the reading I have found, a new subspecies of cheetah that is thought to live in the Sahara desert (The Saharan cheetah). Images of the elusive cat are sparse and most are blurry grayscale captures by a night camera depicting a thin long legged cat that looks almost like a ghostlike apparition. So in the end the two inspirations joined together to form the above imagery. The cheetah is not quite thin enough to be a Saharan cheetah, and it's spots are too pronounced..but I sprinkled a little bit of personal fantasy into the mix.

I hope you folks enjoy it as much as I enjoyed painting it! There is a sister piece I am hoping to do that will accompany this image C=.

If you want to read the article, it is in issue 33 of Digital Artist Magazine, the May issue in the UK and I believe it is released a month later here in the US. Included with the article are the brushes I used C:. You can find the magazine at: Digital Artist Magazine Website . The magazine also features fantastic articles from other artists you may be familiar with, specifically (for those of you as confused by the mystery that is Corel painter!)

Also ps, the image title is actually inspired by the title of an episode of Cosmos, which may have been inspired by the Dali painting (I couldn't say!)
~~~~~~~~~
tools: Photoshop and Wacom Intuos 3
Size:5500x3600 at 300 dpi
Prints: Find prints in my store at [link]
Refs: [link] cheetah pose courtesy of Victoria Hughes of Deadwood Digital. Many many photos for Kolmanskop([link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] & [link] ), more for the sand, sky, and everything else C:!
Related content
Comments: 173

pouncedashfly [2012-05-22 23:26:47 +0000 UTC]

Wow very nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WerewTerrefGrin [2012-05-22 19:51:53 +0000 UTC]

Lovely!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

vhughes [2012-05-22 05:06:39 +0000 UTC]

Congratulations on such a beautiful piece of art, truly amazing work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Inkshadow [2012-05-22 02:35:01 +0000 UTC]

Really beautiful work, as with all your art!
I'm really loving the detail in this one, everything from the rough surface of the walls to the variations in colours in the wall and the decorative pattern.

And then there's the way the cheetah and the wall are lit up by the light, and the way the sand and the sky glitter. ;u; It makes it all seem so magical.
And your fur texture is gorgeous! As with the eyes and the whiskers just- everything looks perfectly natural and yet so mystifying. ouo

Also the way the sand falls beneath the paws and the soft streaks in the sand alksjfdaf I could probably look at this picture for ages and still see more things about it that take my breath away.

Great work!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EBE246 [2012-05-21 17:19:29 +0000 UTC]

how much does a print cost.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EBE246 [2012-05-21 17:18:58 +0000 UTC]

Perfect choice of colors, like always, you fucking rock.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

EBE246 [2012-05-21 17:18:35 +0000 UTC]

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

bwall49 [2012-05-21 17:01:57 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for a detailed explanation of the artwork. I loved the poem with it...you did a fantastic job...I covet your talent

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JonasPride [2012-05-21 13:50:46 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lady-Petty [2012-05-21 12:58:44 +0000 UTC]

Nice! I wanna draw someone like you
And can I have question? Where do you get inspiration?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

merange16 [2012-05-21 07:25:02 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Trinitite [2012-05-21 02:19:50 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous shading and layout.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DameFortune [2012-05-20 22:20:55 +0000 UTC]

You know, everybody is up in arms over the references that are/are not being used, but as an art major I'd say this is good work either way. It's great work, and any of my professors would agree.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CrossHound213 [2012-05-20 21:24:11 +0000 UTC]

absolutely beautiful <3 i love the ghostly glow around the cat and the way you drew and colored the sand <333 it looks almost sparkly, lol XD i definitely need to check out that magazine when it comes out! i'd love to read about the process of making this picture <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TechouNoPenki [2012-05-20 20:17:43 +0000 UTC]

Very nice! So imagenitive!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

martixy [2012-05-20 18:28:32 +0000 UTC]

Funky...
I can always go for more surreal.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

carcassbt [2012-05-20 18:12:13 +0000 UTC]

this is really amazing! love it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CrudeCross [2012-05-20 16:16:04 +0000 UTC]

Very nice!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TakoraDrakan In reply to ??? [2012-05-20 10:10:57 +0000 UTC]

Gorgeous piece of art, so fantasy like, similar to a dream. I love the white cheetah.

I wish this would be available in Wallpaper size, but for now the smaller size has to do it for my desktop.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lindblut [2012-05-20 09:07:54 +0000 UTC]

[link]

A+ copying, Balaa.
And good job at citing references... not!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lindblut In reply to Lindblut [2012-05-20 09:10:48 +0000 UTC]

Whoops nevermind, I just saw you cited Kolmanskop.
But "many photos"? You used just a single one, lol. Are you afraid to link the actual picture because people might think less of you for being not the creative butterfly you want them to think you are?

Sorry but I don't understand why you don't point out references properly, and sometimes not at all UNLESS you're 'found out'. That's pretty damn lame of you, just saying.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

balaa In reply to Lindblut [2012-05-20 10:20:36 +0000 UTC]

I am not sure where this aggression is coming from and I know better than to argue but I must say for my sake more than yours, I never claimed to be a 'creative butterfly' as you seem to think. I am sorry you feel that the amount of views or watchers a person has must mean they are terribly conceited people that have orchestrated the attention they received for their work or robbed it from someone you deem more deserving. I am also sorry you feel it is your duty to make me feel like less of a person because you feel I am not as talented as I 'must' obviously think I am. I do NOT think I am a supereme talent, nor do feel I deserve the attention I have and do receive but I am absolutely humbled by and grateful for it and always eager to see artists 'I' feel deserve more attention than myself receive it. For one I never asked for any of this attention and in years prior have been fairly inactive because of comments such as yours that assume the nature of my character for whatever reasons.

Secondly, in this day and age, I am not sure why you would assume someone would be naive enough to maliciously conceal use of reference when so many eyes are watching and like yourself are eager to find a reason to tear someone down. I've been around long enough to see many many artists torn apart for this sort of thing and many were genuinely naive of the rules and etiquette of referencing, some were naive young kids, some hobbyist who just genuinely didn't know they were doing something wrong but irregardless, I have seen this play out countless times! So I am sorry, but I am not so dense to not know 'how it works'. No I did not use that single ref of Kolmanskop for my painting, regardless of your insisting, but more than two dozen that I came across through various sources (easily found on flickr and google search). I am not sure why you vehemently insist I did when the images are obviously different and the similarities that exist are intentional and aim to conceal nothing. If you google Kolmanskop chances are the few images you find will have similar lighting as my piece because these images very much inspired my choice of light and scenario!

I am also very befuddled as to where all this aggression is coming from but I fail to see other pieces in my gallery that meet with the same criticism you direct at this piece! I suspect you will believe what you want to but I hope if nothing else you will consider that pageviews, comments and faves are not a reflection of the person behind the art. You could have absolutely left a polite comment telling me I should consider citing said image as a reference and I would be more than happy to concede if I feel you are right or for whatever reason I forgot to cite a ref. I am not ashamed of using references and don't feel it reflects poorly on my talent because I don't live in a bubble and don't have photographic memory so of course I must rely on references to create far off worlds. If you feel my images are less valuable because you can see influences from existing pieces of art or photos etc, then by all means, you are welcome to feel that way and not like my images or even think them unoriginal. I do not ask you or anyone to flatter my ego. But there is no need for rudeness when a polite comment will suffice.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Taasla In reply to balaa [2012-05-20 11:46:58 +0000 UTC]

Herro! If I may step in? The photo linked above has very strong resemblance to your painting, along with the doors and color scheme (slightly). It isn't exactly a stock photo, which is probably why people are getting their hackles up that it isn't cited directly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lindblut In reply to balaa [2012-05-20 10:58:36 +0000 UTC]

This has nothing to do with your pageviews or anything. Speaking from artist to artist, it's this dishonesty that just annoys me, regardless of how known or unknown another person is (because internet popularity doesn't mean a thing afterall)

I think you're a skilled artist, and using references is absolutely fine, but not properly citing them on more than one occasion just strifes me as if you would want to try to hide the fact that you did use references afterall.
Knowing that you've done the same thing in 2006 (and apparently still do it?) doesn't help me feel like you've become more honest about it.
Maybe it was a mistake and you just forgot to add it, it happened to me before especially after slaving on something for hours and uploading it in the middle of the night closely before going to bed, but since you didn't even feel like linking the photo after being pointed out to it is just a little "what."
And just to make this clear, the photo I was linking and the part of your art do look extremely similar, and there is no point in denying that.

But honestly all of this could have been avoided if you would have just cited your references properly.

I admit posting a comment wasn't exactly tactful and I should have written a note, so I appologize for that.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

balaa In reply to Lindblut [2012-05-20 11:37:05 +0000 UTC]

I am sorry I find you bringing up something that I occurred more than 6 years ago when I was a naive artist just starting out as an unfair basis for your argument and the amount of animosity you have shown me. If you look at my track record since then you can easily see I have grown up a great deal and have learned how to use references properly. Nor do I feel I have to justify myself after a mistake made so many years ago. Honestly, that's just pedantic. Yes, I like many, made mistakes many years back and I have done my best to learn from them and grow up. if you wish to continue holding those things over my head, you are welcome to and I am not asking you to like my art. This is the first time in so many years that, much to my own dismay, I realized something in one of my images actually matches a ref rather closely and it was purely unintentional and lack of any citation hardly deliberate. I will still disagree with the latter as I will stand by my contention that it is not a direct reference but one of many similarly lit images I used as guidelines and I feel with this you are reaching into the grey area of the etiquette and right's and wrong's of using reference. This is my rational and I did my best to explain to you my viewpoint on the matter, not in an attempt to justify myself with excuses.

And yes maybe it could have been avoided had I not 'forgotten' to cite a reference..but you also could have been polite and treated me as you would like to be treated. Behind the screen are people and if half the people in the world spoke to each other as they do online, there would be a lot more unnecessary hatred.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

bonefish In reply to balaa [2012-05-20 19:53:26 +0000 UTC]

No. Don't do this. Stop weaseling around with words and blatantly lying.

This is the first time in so many years that, much to my own dismay, I realized something in one of my images actually matches a ref rather closely and it was purely unintentional and lack of any citation hardly deliberate.

I'm sorry, but there is no way that you "forgot" that you referenced that cheetah photograph . There's no way the resemblance is unintentional. It is the sole primary reference photograph for the cheetah. No, you didn't do a paintover, and yes, you added quite a bit of your own touch to the final product, but you had to have been sitting there with that precise image pulled up on the side of Photoshop or Painter or whatever as you worked. Everything matches: the cheetah is facing the same direction, the angle of the head is the same, the light sources and shadows are exactly the same, etc. I mean seriously, look, I managed to recreate the essence of your painting with two slightly modified photographs:

[link]

So don't try to act like your use of those specific reference photographs just slipped your mind.

I don't think that anyone here is angry about your using references. Using references is fine. It's good. It helps you make things look right. Most pros do it. But when the final image is so obviously directly derived from photographs, when I can look at your painting and find the original photos in under a minute on Google and flickr, you really, really need to cite your sources. You yourself said it on your tumblr a few days ago:

The best rules for using photos as reference are: Try to use stock photos and pay attention to the rules for the stock (ie whether they can be used in commercial art etc). I will often use photos found on flickr for mood boards but never direct references because these photos belong to someone.

The final art should not resemble any one of your references too closely unless you are using royalty free, purchased or self made references. Copyright law is something all artists need to respect and work around.

References shouldn’t be viewed as cheating but it is true they can be crutches if you use them as a shortcut instead of a tool, ie rendering a 1:1 exact copy of your reference. In my personal opinion copying a photo is a great exercise but I don’t feel these paintings stand on their own merit. They may be accomplished technical pieces but they lack individuality of the human experience, again imho.

Your final art resembles your references closely, and as far as I can tell, neither image was royalty-free. Also, why are you injecting things like popularity, favorites, comments, etc. into this conversation? The original commenter mentioned no such things. This entire comment thread is about use of references and failure to provide citation. That is all.

If you feel my images are less valuable because you can see influences from existing pieces of art or photos etc

It has less to do with value and way, way more to do with giving the original photographers their proper credit. Especially on a piece that you were paid to draw. It also has to do with pulling the wool over the eyes of people on Deviantart. When you "forget" to cite your sources, and when you have a history of doing so, it makes you seem intentionally deceptive. It looks especially bad when you type out what is practically an essay in your artist's description about symbolism, inspiration, etc. but somehow fail to mention that you used any references. And then you only amend your description when discovered and called out.

It all reflects poorly on you, and your attitude in your responses is disheartening. You act as if you're the victim in some kind of aggressive scheme to bring you down and you're laying on the guilt hard. It's not appealing.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Lindblut In reply to balaa [2012-05-20 12:11:47 +0000 UTC]

Well, people will start to assume things, you can't stop them from doing so. And I know people who still do the same mistakes as they did +5 years ago, so old work might still be relevant, even with you.

And I don't believe that the doors with the sands between them is just a coincidence, they're really too close to the photo I linked and you ARE familiar with Kolmanskop's work, afterall. I mean same doorframe style, identical colorpalette, blue wall at the front, green at the back, split colors in the middle part, who do you think you are going to fool? You can keep on denying, but everyone who knows the photo can see the striking resemblance.

But whatever, really. I stated my opinion and so did you, I don't think this conversation's going to get anywhere from this point on. At least you cited their name in your description, which should be good enough. I'll stop breathing down your neck now, take care.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Lindblut In reply to Lindblut [2012-05-20 12:45:06 +0000 UTC]

Okay wait, I'm dumb. I thought Kolmanskop is the person who shot the photo(s), but it's only the city burried in sands.

I think you should give credit to National Geographics esp. Crhis Gray, who took the photo; [link]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

graphiteforlunch [2012-05-20 03:30:31 +0000 UTC]

You were one of the first people I ever watched on DeviantArt. In the past few years I have improved in my skill from long practice... but this is stunning. You have been an inspiration to me and inspired me to get into digital art in the first place (though I still love traditional too) because you revealed the possibilities. And the possibilities, you prove, are GORGEOUS.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

scrii [2012-05-20 02:25:43 +0000 UTC]

i was so honoured to be featured in issue 32 with you! will definitely have to get #33 to see your process, this is absolutely breathtaking. the slight texture lends a traditional-media feel and there's just something really magical about it!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

balaa In reply to scrii [2012-05-20 04:27:01 +0000 UTC]

oh gosh you were??? I need to look for 32 now C:..how wonderful..congrats!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

scrii In reply to balaa [2012-05-21 16:01:11 +0000 UTC]

ah thank you, you too! this certainly trumps anything i could ever do though haha

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wanderinggraphite In reply to ??? [2012-05-20 02:19:44 +0000 UTC]

SOMEDAY I want to paint like you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

DawnSentinel In reply to ??? [2012-05-20 01:01:47 +0000 UTC]

Gah! So beautiful! And I was unaware that there was such a thing as a Saharan cheetah. So their thinner and less spotted?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

DawnSentinel In reply to DawnSentinel [2012-05-20 01:02:07 +0000 UTC]

*they're

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Autumn-Gracy [2012-05-19 23:17:58 +0000 UTC]

INSTA-FAV!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

caramelkarma [2012-05-19 23:13:09 +0000 UTC]

This holds a lot of meaningful symbolism i can relate to. thanks for the upload! i can really connect with it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Minako008 [2012-05-19 23:05:27 +0000 UTC]

I think I felt something when I looked at this picture. Looks amazing, you are so talented!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CorbieLaughter [2012-05-19 22:33:12 +0000 UTC]

it's breathtaking ^_^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

XxoKatoxX [2012-05-19 22:31:50 +0000 UTC]

Dat beautiful DA Mark with the gray background <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

finding-equilibrium [2012-05-19 22:26:58 +0000 UTC]

Your work is simply breathtaking. Every piece is so creative and though-provoking... I will never get tired of seeing your creations!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PinkoPrint [2012-05-19 22:20:18 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

desert-ocean [2012-05-19 22:11:36 +0000 UTC]

Have you ever seen the book titled 'Viewpoints 11' ?
Its crazy how similar the cover is to your sandy doors

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Epimacus [2012-05-19 22:01:46 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me a lot of the works by Keith Alexander, but with a much brighter hue. A very engaging piece. Apart from the questionable light source (s) inside the ruins, it is a well executed. On the other hand, it does have "...a little bit of fantasy..."

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

balaa In reply to Epimacus [2012-05-20 00:48:23 +0000 UTC]

The light sources are very deliberate..though I can understand how the composition may confuse the viewer ;}. Earlier drafts had a clearer sense of story, ie the cheetah faced away from the doorway implying she has gone through them but the feedback I was receiving on the piece from other artists I asked for critique all favored this composition sooo here we are ^^. Again there is a companion piece planned for this one with hopefully a clearer narrative in the composition! The idea being she has traversed the building and the only trace of her presence is the lingering light. Before departing the place and leaving it to it's fate, she faces the ruins and looks skyward, perhaps just taking in the place's memory before it is consumed.

Thank you for the lovely comment C=!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Epimacus In reply to balaa [2012-05-25 23:05:20 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome.
Looking forward to the companion piece.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JEAikman In reply to ??? [2012-05-19 21:30:15 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful This is absolutely stunning

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Kirschii In reply to ??? [2012-05-19 21:12:15 +0000 UTC]

amazing. it's soo beautiful.
there is so much emotion in his eyes.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CPawz [2012-05-19 20:43:57 +0000 UTC]

This is Amazing! <3

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Neznanc [2012-05-19 20:06:03 +0000 UTC]

magical!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>