HOME | DD

Published: 2009-05-20 12:39:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 117815; Favourites: 1916; Downloads: 10805
Redirect to original
Description
DWIV Machine CyborgRelated content
Comments: 177
Nightshade255 [2011-11-21 23:55:37 +0000 UTC]
Excellent skill and very creative, i love the machine legs and the all around feel of it. The color is spectacular and the technology is nice and rugged. I must say though, the attempt to keep it sexy only takes away from the composition, in the future i would suggest keeping it either badass or sexy. not both
8.5/10
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
WinterImperfect In reply to Nightshade255 [2011-11-22 01:23:10 +0000 UTC]
couldn't have said it better myself. It's amazingly done but.. it looks awkward with the lack of armor and/or clothing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Dark1577-7 [2011-11-22 02:31:57 +0000 UTC]
thank god im not the only one here D:
i mean how is she going to win any battles? pray that the opposing people are all straight needy loser virgin men who dont know how to act around a lady with her vagina and ass hanging out? >__<
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Alexander-Brandt In reply to Narunar [2011-11-22 03:16:22 +0000 UTC]
Four words:
Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Alexander-Brandt [2011-11-22 04:08:34 +0000 UTC]
Four words:
You Are A Trooper
More words:
I Am Not One
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dark1577-7 In reply to Narunar [2011-11-22 02:34:43 +0000 UTC]
Yea ik Seriously and this is a cyborg? Whats with all the skin anyway? Sigh. Sad how obvious it is that a guy made this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Dark1577-7 [2011-11-22 02:38:09 +0000 UTC]
yeah cyborgs are more robot than human if at all human
i am now ashamed of this person and how they objectify the body of a woman so easily this is borderline pornographic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dark1577-7 In reply to Narunar [2011-11-22 02:51:08 +0000 UTC]
same here, men can be so sad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Dark1577-7 [2011-11-22 03:07:14 +0000 UTC]
But of course everyone else is just enjoying all of it because hey look sexy half naked chick with robot parts oh my god all my fetishes all of them :I
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dark1577-7 In reply to Narunar [2011-11-22 03:10:49 +0000 UTC]
Meh, ik and of course it got a daily deviantion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Dark1577-7 [2011-11-22 04:07:44 +0000 UTC]
Ah the beautiful example of turning women in to objects and trying to justify it by calling it art I wouldn't be so upset if she at least had some panties on
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dark1577-7 In reply to Narunar [2011-11-22 04:16:48 +0000 UTC]
Ik very irritating. I am pretty much fine with the tape on her chest if she had some pants
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Narunar In reply to Dark1577-7 [2011-11-22 04:48:42 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I even would have accepted a thong :I
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Xalts In reply to ??? [2011-11-21 23:18:29 +0000 UTC]
Is there any reason for her to have her tits and ass out? If she were a cyborg, granted she wouldn't need as much protection to her body, but then is there any need for her to even have tits or ass?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Frigidchick In reply to Xalts [2011-11-22 00:46:32 +0000 UTC]
Okay, I was wondering the same thing too. She's hot, but... REALLY?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Alexander-Brandt [2011-11-21 22:51:36 +0000 UTC]
It does irritate me that the female version shows off so much flesh. Were it male, none of the skin would be so obvious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
NotXRAY0128 In reply to Alexander-Brandt [2011-11-21 23:21:49 +0000 UTC]
I wonder how this would be an effective armour in the first place..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alexander-Brandt In reply to NotXRAY0128 [2011-11-22 00:30:52 +0000 UTC]
It wouldn't, but she'll likely be going up against some graduates from the Stormtrooper School of Marksmanship.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NotXRAY0128 In reply to Alexander-Brandt [2011-11-22 01:09:37 +0000 UTC]
I guess people that graduate from there are cheaper? XD j/k
Its surprising how much bad guys have troops that can't aim
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alexander-Brandt In reply to NotXRAY0128 [2011-11-22 01:49:33 +0000 UTC]
That's because characters would be forced to rely on actual skill if the generic guards ever developed accuracy with a weapon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SilantWanderer In reply to Alexander-Brandt [2011-11-21 23:06:05 +0000 UTC]
I was thinking the same thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Alexander-Brandt In reply to SilantWanderer [2011-11-22 00:31:28 +0000 UTC]
Notice how no other comments mention the lack of armor. Everyone loves the "detail," but no one is willing to look at the flaws.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
saikyoDRAGON [2011-11-21 22:50:39 +0000 UTC]
i remember seeing concept art for this before. looks really good in 3D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Killrave [2011-11-21 22:17:36 +0000 UTC]
I wish the gun wasn't there...
But other than that, really awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Vmmc385 [2011-11-21 21:53:19 +0000 UTC]
I think there is too much attention paid on making this thing "sexy". It's not practical in a battlefield, and is not formal enough for a battlefield.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
iceofwolf [2011-11-21 21:00:17 +0000 UTC]
This is something that could have walked straight out of a Royo painting. Incredible attention to aesthetic detail, pose and expression, and especially form - her anatomy all looks right, and very pleasing to the eyes (on my little screen, at least).
Ignore those who complain about her attire. You've implied with your title that she's a machine cyborg. Machines and cyborgs both (depending on their design, if one insists in being realistic) ignore many rules. Besides, it really is just art and Royo has been painting naked warriors for decades.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ThrowDownYourHat In reply to iceofwolf [2014-03-28 18:35:23 +0000 UTC]
There's a difference between nakedness and deliberately portraying someone as a sex object.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
iceofwolf In reply to ThrowDownYourHat [2014-06-06 08:40:40 +0000 UTC]
I guess there's supposed to be a depth of meaning in your words.
Personally, I can't decide if you're just randomly declaring an ambiguous statement, trying to engage in discussion or trying to force a personal distaste for the artwork by dismissing positive commentary with a pithy but ultimately meaningless remark.
Being an optimist, I'd like to believe you were trying to engage in discussion with a rather awkward opener.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
alienbuffalo101 In reply to ??? [2011-11-21 20:15:56 +0000 UTC]
The weakness is in the leg armor. Other than that she can probably kick all out butts.
Great model.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
FirenzeLotus22 In reply to ??? [2011-11-21 19:57:16 +0000 UTC]
Yes, because she would TOTALLY survive dressed like that
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CB1964 [2011-11-21 18:28:53 +0000 UTC]
Great model, so sorry that this is no content for Poser, DS etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
AnosaurusRex [2011-11-21 17:55:44 +0000 UTC]
to all these people who are so overly immature and offend about the lack of clothing, its art. get over it. beautiful job btw :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anako-ART In reply to AnosaurusRex [2011-11-21 18:02:51 +0000 UTC]
art doesn't need to be logical, of course. but don't call 'immature' people who point out something that would be clearly ridiculous in real life. it's not the matter of maturity, it's the matter of personal perception of art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
| Next =>