HOME | DD
damir-g-martin β His Vision Is Based On Movement
#birdwatching #dinosaur #grandpa
Published: 2016-09-21 20:30:40 +0000 UTC; Views: 9356; Favourites: 302; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Just a fun mashup of the existing paleo piece I made couple months ago."His vision is based on movement, dont worry guys!" Famous last words?
Go birdwatcing they said...
This image is created using Zbrush, Photoshop and 3DS Max.Β
Related content
Comments: 85
how did you make this awesome image? i love this image
π: 0 β©: 1
I dunnoΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
do you know who made this image?
π: 0 β©: 1
I made it 
Technically, I made it in Zbrush, Photoshop and 3ds Max.
π: 0 β©: 1
i use blender and online photo editor and motion to make animation. would you like to see my animation?
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, the vision thing is baloney. Mr Rex probably saw better than we do. (Unless it was the frog DNA dictating his sight, in which case, maybe?)
π: 0 β©: 0
I know right. I wish it was real.
π: 0 β©: 0
I liked it when dinosaurs were reptiles, not birds with teeth. Β Science ruined my childhood =c
π: 0 β©: 4
Scientific facts do not care about your childhood.
π: 1 β©: 1
I do, for myself that's enough.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, ironically when it comes to the ancient past, people should not stick to their own past.Β The first depiction of feathered non-avian Dinosaurs date back to 70s I might mention.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ironically my opinions and feelings matter, whether you or the ancient past like it or not.
I stated my opinion and how i felt about it nothing more.
I did not try to disprove science nor deny it, so why re you still riding my back about it?
π: 0 β©: 1
The point is, there is a certain Anti Science Movement. And idiots whining about science ruining Dinosaurs does not help.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm not part of said movement i like science just like any other person but theres just things i prefer to not know because they seemed better before i knew the truth about them. I don't NEED to know the truth about everything. And yeah science did ruin dinosaurs for me, what of it? its an opinion i'm having. If utilizing my rights makes me an idiot then so fucking well be it.
π: 0 β©: 1
You know, for every piece of good Dinosaur ( not to confuse with the terrible Pixar movie ) art there is probably like 10 or so pieces of terribly outdated Dinosaur art being uploaded. Perfect for the likes of you.
π: 0 β©: 1
For every good comment i read i read ten from self absorbed know it alls like yourself, you should go mingle with them rather than wasting your efforts where they will fall on deaf ears.
π: 0 β©: 0
Well you could just consider birds a type of dinosaur and therefore a type of reptile...
π: 0 β©: 1
Birds are not reptiles. at least i don't consider them to be. Reptiles with hair and feathers... atrocious.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dude taxonomy not as clear cut and dry as it used to be. Also hair is a trait unique only to synapsids, which includes mammals. Diapsids can have scales and/or feathers depending on what they are.
π: 0 β©: 1
I asked not for a lecture on what things are, i know all that hence my frustration on the progress of science. When i was a kid dinosaurs were only known to be just big scaled lizards with nothing but raw hide claws and teeth, and i liked them that way is all i'm saying. Research wasn't as advanced back then as it is now.
π: 0 β©: 1
Just big scaled lizards? Did your childhood consider entirely on watching movies with Slurpasaurs?
π: 0 β©: 1
Did yours consist out of getting beat up a lot because you keep sticking your nose where it doesn't belong?
π: 0 β©: 1
It does not surprise me.
π: 0 β©: 0
Dinosaurs are all still reptiles and most are not birds, that hasn't changed
π: 0 β©: 1
All the ones i like turn out to have had feathers.. i liked it when they were scaly.
π: 0 β©: 1
Then suck it up and accept it for what it is.
π: 0 β©: 1
I do i just stated i liked them the way people used to think they looked like, no need to attack me on that.
π: 0 β©: 0
"Seems more than a giant turkey to me!" as far as famous last words go...
Interesting manip; very dramatic actually.
π: 0 β©: 1