HOME | DD

DragonQuestWes — Fuck the updated block feature

Published: 2010-07-11 22:42:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 9388; Favourites: 200; Downloads: 23
Redirect to original
Description There are a few of you who may think that this is a good thing. But you know what I think? It's not. I'll tell you why:

It used to be that when you block someone, they just can't reply to your page. But for some reason, dA thought it was a good idea to update it so that people can't reply to you AT ALL. ANYWHERE. It may sound good at first but if you really REALLY think about it, it will backfire and create even more drama.

It is possible for trolls to abuse this updated block feature and spam your page with multiple sockpuppet accounts that you can't reply to because you're blocked. "So what?" You say, "you can just block back or report them." True. But what if this happens to you?

Also, what if you wanted negotiate for a diplomatic solution (or in simpler terms, talk it over)? There has to be at least some way to put an end to the drama if you wanted to end it. "Oh, if you get blocked, chances are you deserved it and don't deserve second chances." Butthurt anti-second chancers can eat a dick for all I care. I believe in second chances, but I also believe in taking responsibility for your own shit. So fuck you to butthurt anti-second chancers.

TL;DR: The updated block feature sucks and will only do more damage than good.
Related content
Comments: 255

owtheedge69 In reply to ??? [2017-08-25 03:24:26 +0000 UTC]

uhhhh, what?, also i got what your fuck pride stamp was its fuck pride we dont care ( good thing i got it right )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Buniis [2017-08-24 09:48:06 +0000 UTC]

Woah the old blocking featured sucked and sounds like it barely did it's job.

Good on DA ! 2010 was a productive year for this site.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Buniis [2017-08-24 12:42:14 +0000 UTC]

Who are you to say the new blocking feature is better?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Buniis In reply to DragonQuestWes [2017-08-25 09:23:49 +0000 UTC]

I've been consistently active on this site for 8 and a half years lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Buniis [2017-08-25 09:42:58 +0000 UTC]

And?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Buniis In reply to DragonQuestWes [2017-08-25 10:29:09 +0000 UTC]

It's worked just fine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Buniis [2017-08-25 13:38:04 +0000 UTC]

And you think anyone cares?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Buniis In reply to DragonQuestWes [2017-08-25 22:53:22 +0000 UTC]

I thought this was a public submissive open to opinions.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Buniis [2017-08-25 23:46:18 +0000 UTC]

Doesn't mean anything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Infernallect In reply to ??? [2016-07-16 11:58:51 +0000 UTC]

Sometimes I get blocked for little to no reason lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Infernallect [2016-07-16 17:06:53 +0000 UTC]

Internet "safe space" entitlement.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Infernallect In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-07-16 20:34:41 +0000 UTC]

Tru.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sandstorm724 In reply to ??? [2016-06-25 11:58:19 +0000 UTC]

There are some people who also misunderstand you but then you find out they blocked you and you can't even apologise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Spongebob-Killer In reply to Sandstorm724 [2016-07-04 06:06:38 +0000 UTC]

not unless you've got an alternate account with you, and you can be able to apologize to them with that

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sandstorm724 In reply to Spongebob-Killer [2016-07-09 06:34:57 +0000 UTC]

Unfortunately, that breaks the rules of Block avoiding and you just gotta hate doing that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Spongebob-Killer In reply to Sandstorm724 [2016-07-09 07:02:20 +0000 UTC]

really? huh, didn't know that

but didn't they block you over something ridiculous?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sandstorm724 In reply to Spongebob-Killer [2016-07-09 07:15:36 +0000 UTC]

Yeah but still. Block avoiding can result in a ban... I only risked it twice for a good reason: finding out WHY I got blocked. And the simple answer is: the person got worried it might extend to a major issue.

I understood them so... yeah...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonQuestWes In reply to Sandstorm724 [2016-06-25 16:06:08 +0000 UTC]

That's their fault because they feel entitled to other people's disappearances.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sandstorm724 In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-06-25 19:24:44 +0000 UTC]

That's true. I try being nice but I get blocked anyways. It's honestly not a fair trade...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Sandstorm724 [2016-06-25 23:04:24 +0000 UTC]

Of course not. These people are sheltered as fuck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sandstorm724 In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-06-25 23:44:02 +0000 UTC]

Don't worry, the issue was resolved. I was only blocked because the person was worried about things escalating and we forgive each other.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Sandstorm724 [2016-06-26 04:00:05 +0000 UTC]

Whatever happens, happens. I guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sandstorm724 In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-06-26 17:47:59 +0000 UTC]

Yeah. But as long as it's a misunderstanding, there's always a way to fix it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to ??? [2016-05-18 08:20:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh look, we agree.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-05-18 17:44:37 +0000 UTC]

Why block people when you can report them for breaking the rules honestly?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-05-18 18:30:30 +0000 UTC]

IDEK, my block list is as naked as a mole rat. But the amount of people who block me, half I'd never even met. The list could fill a room.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DanksForTheMemeries In reply to ??? [2016-01-16 01:33:13 +0000 UTC]

you can't even fave something from someone who blocked you

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Yitsul In reply to DanksForTheMemeries [2016-11-18 05:55:54 +0000 UTC]

That's the major problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DragonQuestWes In reply to DanksForTheMemeries [2016-01-16 04:31:45 +0000 UTC]

That's the problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DanksForTheMemeries In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-01-16 13:56:22 +0000 UTC]

yeah. i was going through my group messages one day and I was like "hey this is a really cool picture! i should favorite this!" and then I couldn't and it didn't make sense until I saw who made it.  I was blocked for disagreeing with him about vegetarianism...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to DanksForTheMemeries [2016-01-16 19:21:23 +0000 UTC]

Some people just want to be miserable.

I sure as hell don't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DanksForTheMemeries In reply to DragonQuestWes [2016-01-17 14:02:00 +0000 UTC]

Me neither.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LouisEugenioJR1990 [2015-07-13 06:02:27 +0000 UTC]

I only block spammers, trolls, users I'm having issues with, users who won't leave me alone and block abusers.  Personally, I think the staff should start revoking the block feature from people who abuse it as a way of saying "don't block unless you really need to".

BTW, kudos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to LouisEugenioJR1990 [2015-07-13 06:07:50 +0000 UTC]

Or they could ban those who deserve to be banned. The good thing is this: The deviantART staff reserve the right to have anybody banned for ANY reason or no reason at all. Same thing when it comes to deleting deviations OR banning someone from reporting deviations (yes, people have gotten banned from reporting deviations, not exactly a ban on their account but still).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LouisEugenioJR1990 In reply to DragonQuestWes [2015-07-13 06:08:38 +0000 UTC]

Amen to that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zucca-Xerfantes [2015-02-24 09:47:49 +0000 UTC]

ONl yyou could find something to complain about regarding a protection of privacy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2015-02-24 17:14:50 +0000 UTC]

What are you talking about?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zucca-Xerfantes In reply to DragonQuestWes [2015-02-24 18:06:51 +0000 UTC]

I've been harassed by pretty extensively and the blocking system has kept him from doing so.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2015-02-24 18:14:36 +0000 UTC]

Don't know who that is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zucca-Xerfantes In reply to DragonQuestWes [2015-02-24 18:50:44 +0000 UTC]

Let me ask you a very important question then...

In your understanding, are all religious beliefs and expression welcome in an ideal Communist society?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2015-02-24 19:29:38 +0000 UTC]

Religion should have nothing to do with politics nor should it be involved in politics either. That is all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zucca-Xerfantes In reply to DragonQuestWes [2015-02-24 19:35:30 +0000 UTC]

I'm not talking about politics.

Under a Communist society, should people be allowed to practice religion in their own home and places of worship so long as it doesn't interfere with State affairs?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to Zucca-Xerfantes [2015-02-24 19:39:09 +0000 UTC]

Religious people will always practice their religious/spiritual beliefs within their own homes and places of worship, should they decide to practice their religion/spiritual belief.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Zucca-Xerfantes In reply to DragonQuestWes [2015-02-24 20:07:56 +0000 UTC]

Well, Fiske there believes in Communism, but only as a means to eradicate religion.

You and I disagree a good deal, but you've *never* blocked me and no matter how wrong I believe you to be, you at least have the integrity to face your detractors head-on.

I never knew how much I'd appreciate that until I met Fiske.

You and I both know that Communism isn't meant to be a tool used by atheists to commit genocide, yes?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

silverplatine In reply to ??? [2014-09-27 18:46:29 +0000 UTC]

Not only that but I've been block by someone else mainly because I called them out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to silverplatine [2014-09-28 05:12:16 +0000 UTC]

Then they can't handle criticism.

The way I see it, the easiest way to handle criticism is not to block people from responding to you and I've handled criticism VERY well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

silverplatine In reply to DragonQuestWes [2014-09-28 12:21:40 +0000 UTC]

It wasn't even criticism, someone made a rant about him claiming that what the blocker claims to be canon wasn't mainly because SEGA never announced it, then he said he was going to report it for art theft and that's were I came in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moonfire-dovahkiin In reply to ??? [2014-09-04 20:59:40 +0000 UTC]

i NEVER blocked someone

and i plan not to
unless they piss me off after i try to reason with them

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DragonQuestWes In reply to moonfire-dovahkiin [2014-09-04 21:02:26 +0000 UTC]

good

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HUANGXUELI In reply to ??? [2014-08-19 20:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Really? They had this back then?
People like to block me after they reply, after a reply that makes me angry. It's a shame you can't interact with them in any way now because the bitch went for a shortcut to end the argument.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>