HOME | DD

Description
Chasm Cosm

Dilated pupils, provocative, bipedal,
I see you’re on the sentiental level,
By the promiscuous, providential,
Cyclically cynical behavior,
I presume your train of logic
Nonetheless proverbially biased,
By means of basis, and preventative
Promoting the self from argumentative loss,
Augmented improperly poised,
Rooted in facts from fiction,

I see the great void of nothing
But ineffable hypocrisy,
I see this certainly by the
Wordplay, and headstrong
Steadfast ego, wavering
To nothing, no dissolution
So I probably should set aside
Counterfactual wordplay
For albeit bemusing
I’ll refrain from dis solution
Latency, even if oddly construed

Do you not see?
Can you not believe?
Thee are vessels of logic and math,
Confined by the ego,
What power is merited but suffering?
When abroad broad daylight,
Thy tread on the soils of matter
Of fact, bemusing at least
That you call it that,
When the conditions apply,
You claim to extrapolate meaning
And knowledge from nothing,
You continuously dismiss
The ones who try to liberate you
You formulate your responses
With a mind of poise and war
Yet you cannot decipher
What was before

Imagine a something eternal as mass for your laws, forewarned,
Dictate the timelessly eternal and by no means accept the beginning as void, this claim of falsemy began when science was still growing understanding, what could modernity apply, what measures but a grain of sand in a small box as a mind,

But when apparent truth is subjugated by freedom of reasoning
Why would it matter if, and if correct me if I am wrong, that you were more right for a reason to you?

Like a charade of broken leg folk,
Like a shared collective of folk,

I suggest the beginning as void, as zero the infinite and finite, under this circumstance, perhaps has an eternal quality, yet under this circumstance could easily be exception of matter not being created nor destroyed, yet why is this eternal truth accepted when antimatter is essentially destroyed by all models of science?

The Big Bang is nothing more than a proposed hypothesis and if it fits in the meaning of the core of yang, then it could surely be probable that the threshold lines are just the fluctuation of duality.

And here we are, organisms of paradigm in my opinion of the great dawn and decay of everything, what must be after this recognized truth of life must come to an end

When aftermath of everything supposes the recurring Big Bang as if widely accepted, would this not be more so probable that it would be opposite? The theory of this realm, is a concept known as the after time, a place of whiteness and echoes, the equal opposite of the Big Bang.

Thereby you believe in scratching the surface, I believe in open mindedness, for if mass is only observable in this state of reality, it does not and cannot prove it only circumstance that can happen. You cannot create knowledge from nothing but you certainly can ask questions to gain a greater knowledge, check your sources egos

What did light come from again? Was it a prospect of our imagination? Or a concept that can elucidate a greater value of meaning? I say, if the universe incarnated here, what shame it would be, that we have such things as war, famine, religious mind control, but hey if logic determines your current technical safety, in the confines of your mind, then I guess that discounts all other emotions which verily includes problems that aren’t yours and that makes it okay to ignore the problems of mankind, regardless of my personal opinion of nothing.

Description
Chasm Cosm

Dilated pupils, provocative, bipedal,
I see you’re on the sentiental level,
By the promiscuous, providential,
Cyclically cynical behavior,
I presume your train of logic
Nonetheless proverbially biased,
By means of basis, and preventative
Promoting the self from argumentative loss,
Augmented improperly poised,
Rooted in facts from fiction,

I see the great void of nothing
But ineffable hypocrisy,
I see this certainly by the
Wordplay, and headstrong
Steadfast ego, wavering
To nothing, no dissolution
So I probably should set aside
Counterfactual wordplay
For albeit bemusing
I’ll refrain from dis solution
Latency, even if oddly construed

Do you not see?
Can you not believe?
Thee are vessels of logic and math,
Confined by the ego,
What power is merited but suffering?
When abroad broad daylight,
Thy tread on the soils of matter
Of fact, bemusing at least
That you call it that,
When the conditions apply,
You claim to extrapolate meaning
And knowledge from nothing,
You continuously dismiss
The ones who try to liberate you
You formulate your responses
With a mind of poise and war
Yet you cannot decipher
What was before

Imagine a something eternal as mass for your laws, forewarned,
Dictate the timelessly eternal and by no means accept the beginning as void, this claim of falsemy began when science was still growing understanding, what could modernity apply, what measures but a grain of sand in a small box as a mind,

But when apparent truth is subjugated by freedom of reasoning
Why would it matter if, and if correct me if I am wrong, that you were more right for a reason to you?

Like a charade of broken leg folk,
Like a shared collective of folk,

I suggest the beginning as void, as zero the infinite and finite, under this circumstance, perhaps has an eternal quality, yet under this circumstance could easily be exception of matter not being created nor destroyed, yet why is this eternal truth accepted when antimatter is essentially destroyed by all models of science?

The Big Bang is nothing more than a proposed hypothesis and if it fits in the meaning of the core of yang, then it could surely be probable that the threshold lines are just the fluctuation of duality.

And here we are, organisms of paradigm in my opinion of the great dawn and decay of everything, what must be after this recognized truth of life must come to an end

When aftermath of everything supposes the recurring Big Bang as if widely accepted, would this not be more so probable that it would be opposite? The theory of this realm, is a concept known as the after time, a place of whiteness and echoes, the equal opposite of the Big Bang.

Thereby you believe in scratching the surface, I believe in open mindedness, for if mass is only observable in this state of reality, it does not and cannot prove it only circumstance that can happen. You cannot create knowledge from nothing but you certainly can ask questions to gain a greater knowledge, check your sources egos

What did light come from again? Was it a prospect of our imagination? Or a concept that can elucidate a greater value of meaning? I say, if the universe incarnated here, what shame it would be, that we have such things as war, famine, religious mind control, but hey if logic determines your current technical safety, in the confines of your mind, then I guess that discounts all other emotions which verily includes problems that aren’t yours and that makes it okay to ignore the problems of mankind, regardless of my personal opinion of nothing.