HOME | DD

Inkfish7 — Writing Better Character Descriptions
Published: 2012-06-05 20:16:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 46330; Favourites: 2846; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description body div#devskin0 hr { }

Writing Better Character Descriptions

We writers have a particularly tough job: bringing nonexistent people (our characters) to life in our readers’ imaginations. While it’s never easy, we usually accomplish this magic by writing each character with two qualities in mind:

1) Their personality

2) Their physical appearance

Personality is usually expressed through characterization, and appearance through physical description. Admittedly, that doesn't sound so complicated.

But there are two things I’ll suggest today: first, that description needs to do more than just craft appearance, and second, it’s good characterization, more than anything, that’s the key to conjuring vivid characters.


Character Description:

Let’s take a look at the following example.

1) When I entered Mr. Smith's office, he stood from his desk and smiled. He had a big nose, brown eyes, and short, blond hair. He wore a dark suit. I shook his hand.

What can you tell me about Mr. Smith from this brief scene? The physical details tell us he has a big nose, brown eyes, and short, blond hair. He’s wearing a dark suit. You can visualize him—but I wonder, can you tell me anything about his personality? His life or past? I suppose you could gather he’s a businessman, considering the suit and office, but what does his big nose say? His brown eyes? His short, blond hair?

Although these details provide an image, what they don’t really do is tell a story. Effective details do, giving readers a glimpse of the grit and eccentricity of the character.

With that in mind, let’s take another crack at this scene, but this time using storytelling details.


2) When I entered Mr. Smith's office, he stood from his desk and smiled. He wore a dark suit, with the shirt collar unbuttoned to reveal the red plume of an ascot. I shook his hand. The knuckles were rough, callused, his grip strong.

Now what can you tell me about Mr. Smith? Well, looking at the suit and ascot, we can tell he has a flamboyant sense of style. There’s confidence there, too, because really, nobody’s pulled off an ascot this well since Fred Jones. As for his rough, callused knuckles and strong grip, maybe he used to work with his hands. Or maybe he isn’t unfamiliar with knocking a few heads together now and again.

This should conjure a far more compelling image of Mr. Smith in your imagination. The key, again, is storytelling details. You need purpose with your descriptions, an aim or goal. As for those "checklist" details, the details you include to satisfy an imaginary quota (like his big nose, brown eyes, and short, blond hair), they're more often than not worth cutting.

Surprise the reader! Avoid the expected in your descriptions, and your character's nuances and personality will come to life.

As for how to do this, the simplest tip I can give is to be specific.


Specificity:

Not just a dark suit, but a suit with the shirt unbuttoned to reveal a red ascot. Not just a handshake, but the feeling of callused knuckles. When you get specific, the details will start to say something about your characters, whether you want them to or not.

For example, if Lucas tells you he wears cologne, you don’t learn much about him. But how does your image of him change when you hear he spritzes his neck every morning with Acqua di Gio? Or gasses his chest with Axe Body Spray? Heck, I once knew a kid who'd spray himself with Fabreze after gym class.

We’re all human and love to make assumptions. All we need are the tiniest details to get started, and hey, if the fish are biting…


Deciding on Details:

To figure out the details appropriate for your character, you could sit down and fill out a character sheet if you'd like: DeviantArt has a bunch of them. But really, I think you just need to start writing, build on your characters as you go, and think about how their personalities might be expressed through description.

But here's a quick word of advice: don't feel the need to spend paragraphs describing your characters. Some writers do, and some writers don't. I used to write heavy descriptions because I thought that was good writing, but it didn't feel natural, and when I finally eased up, it was like a breath of fresh air. You can't write like someone else. You need to write like you.

However, I will say one last thing on the topic.


Characterization over Description:

Character descriptions aren’t actually necessary. Characterization is necessary, but stories can flourish even with very little character description.

My favorite example of an author who understands this is Orson Scott Card. If you read any of his books, you'll quickly realize how little time he spends describing his characters. You're often given only age, gender, and ethnicity to go off of, cold imageless facts, but his characters still come to life. Why? Because of his excellent characterization. We already picture the characters on the intimate level of the soul, so we don't need visual details to carry us along.

There's an argument that goes: the more you describe a character, the more you tear down the image already formed in the reader's mind, an image the reader quite liked; and I believe that's true. At least, it's true for me when I read a story, so I incorporate that into how I write.

Some people think otherwise. They like to be fully immersed in an author's vision, to see as the author sees, and so they revel in heavy description. That's fine, too. We need both types writers for both types of readers.

The choice is yours. What's important, whether you go heavy or light, is that your details shouldn't be of the checklist variety. They need to have purpose, direction. You shouldn't have to tell us that Lisa is a brunette with hazel eyes and high cheekbones. You don’t need to give us her hair color, eye color, height, weight, bust, yada yada. Just guide us to what's important, and we'll do the rest.

In parting, here’s a phrase worth keeping in mind: it's not how much you describe, but what you choose to describe that matters.

After all, you could describe every hair on your character's head, every pimple, if you wanted to. But who’d want to read that?


Enjoy my work? Follow me on Tumblr!
I don't know if you looked at the publish date of this guide, but I wrote it 7 years ago in college. Since then, I've earned an MFA in Fiction, spent a year teaching writing, and now work as a copywriter in New England. I also no longer post on DeviantArt.

But if you'd like more writing advice like you read above, just with an extra 7 years of experience, stop on by my Tumblr, MichaelBjorkWrites , where I post weekly writing advice.

Visit MichaelBjorkWrites.tumblr.com



Related content
Comments: 595

Ghosty95 In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 01:03:50 +0000 UTC]

Wow. This can actually help me out with my stories. Thanks for putting this up.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to Ghosty95 [2012-06-06 02:42:10 +0000 UTC]

No problem!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheIronHorse In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 01:00:37 +0000 UTC]

very helpful I thought.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to TheIronHorse [2012-06-06 02:43:18 +0000 UTC]

Glad to hear it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Corky-tan In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 00:56:53 +0000 UTC]

Oh boy. The biggest problem with crazy teenage fangirls and their OCs is that they give them the most characterization. "Blah blah was raised by an evil orphanage owner with his twin brother, then they fell in love and had hot smexy twincest".


It just goes on and on....and on....and on....

....


....and on.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Inkfish7 In reply to Corky-tan [2012-06-06 02:46:03 +0000 UTC]

Haha, yeah, there's an art to characterization as well. Too bad we end up with the hot smexy twincest, though....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Corky-tan In reply to Corky-tan [2012-06-06 00:57:16 +0000 UTC]

Most ridiculous* characterization. Whoopsies.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WorldHero In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 00:55:47 +0000 UTC]

This is PERFECT. I've been meaning to work on my character descriptions in my writing, along with describing other scenes. I have a hard time putting details into words like this...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WorldHero [2012-06-06 03:01:58 +0000 UTC]

Haha, it takes time, I suppose. You'll get it, I'm sure!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WorldHero In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:44:12 +0000 UTC]

I've been writing for 8 years and my descriptions haven't really improved a lot, but...Practice makes perfect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WorldHero [2012-06-06 03:47:33 +0000 UTC]

That it does. And I'm sure even if your descriptions haven't jumped ahead, you've gathered other strengths in this time. Good luck with your writing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WorldHero In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 04:03:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

disrhythmic In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 00:53:38 +0000 UTC]

You made the front page! About time some good lit shows up there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 03:02:43 +0000 UTC]

Holy Moses, you're right! Thanks for telling me! Weird thing, though. I have to log off my profile to see it....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:08:37 +0000 UTC]

Really? Do you have the front page set to Popular 8 Hours?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 03:24:16 +0000 UTC]

Nope, but no worries! It's there now. Just took a little while.... Little bugger.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:25:12 +0000 UTC]

Enjoy the inpouring of faves and pageviews. You deserve them. ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 03:33:35 +0000 UTC]

Haha, thanks! Between you and me, it does feel kind of good.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:34:44 +0000 UTC]

You're also in the journal footer! At the top, no less!

-is so excited about this-

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 03:40:12 +0000 UTC]

Haha, I think this calls for a happy bounce, don't you?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:42:02 +0000 UTC]



Happybouncin' all day long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 03:46:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes! My favorite emote.


👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:48:05 +0000 UTC]

Bouncy bouncy bouncy bouncy bouncy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-06 04:13:23 +0000 UTC]

Never going to get tired of that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Imugiki In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 00:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Wow, this is really helpful! I have the tendancy to under-describe my characters, using mainly actions and dialogue for their characterization. This has some good tips on how I should get something in for the more minor characters that scarcely talk or appear, to better help the mental image. Thanks a thousand times for posting this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to Imugiki [2012-06-06 03:03:15 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, no problem!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ErokoTan In reply to ??? [2012-06-06 00:08:18 +0000 UTC]

This is rather enlightening, especially from a writer's perspective. It's always nice to get an added perspective and tips on how to improve especially when it's in depth on a specific area.

I do have to say that this really gives a novice writer (and some more experienced writers), a good grasp of really how to help mold how the reader envisions a character.

Overall, I greatly approve.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to ErokoTan [2012-06-06 03:03:46 +0000 UTC]

Haha, thanks! I'm glad you liked it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ErokoTan In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-09 16:01:42 +0000 UTC]

No problem!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gullara In reply to ??? [2012-06-05 22:50:30 +0000 UTC]

This is an excellent guide. I'm going to have to keep it in mind. I know I fall into the trap of over describing my characters. Mostly because I have a rather detailed mental image of them, and it's tough not to want to have the readers see exactly what I see.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Inkfish7 In reply to Gullara [2012-06-06 03:05:04 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I know what you mean. But hey, if you work the descriptions and characterization right, you'll get close!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

x-Jazzy-B-Real-x In reply to Gullara [2012-06-06 00:32:50 +0000 UTC]

"...it's tough not to want to have the readers see exactly what I see."

...Hm! I think that should be the point. It is your world we are entering, after all.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WoodscourtBooks In reply to ??? [2012-06-05 20:44:46 +0000 UTC]

This is a really good guide to finding the right balance of character description. Thanks for sharing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WoodscourtBooks [2012-06-05 20:56:17 +0000 UTC]

No problem!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

WonHitWonder In reply to ??? [2012-06-05 20:40:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for making this, I tend to fall into the trap of describing my characters physically because I feel I'm "supposed to," not because I really need to. It's something new for me to really think about

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WonHitWonder [2012-06-05 20:55:58 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it's weird the first time you consider it. But hey, do you like Sci-Fi? If you do, I highly recommend Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game and the sequels/spin-offs. My favorite series, my favorite author, and he's the one that proves the point best.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WonHitWonder In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 01:42:02 +0000 UTC]

I love Ender's Game, it was so good! XD My friend ADORES Card, so he made me read it.
And it was required reading my freshman year, so I was happy to read it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WonHitWonder [2012-06-06 02:22:29 +0000 UTC]

Gosh, I wish it had been required reading for me freshman year! I didn't discover it until I was a senior....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WonHitWonder In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 02:41:21 +0000 UTC]

Our theme for the year was "coming of age." The class was great, but the final paper was a killer...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WonHitWonder [2012-06-06 02:50:11 +0000 UTC]

Papers.... yuck.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WonHitWonder In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 04:07:16 +0000 UTC]

Blegh... papers make me enjoy reading a whole lot less. It's ok for good books, but ruins the average ones for me

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to WonHitWonder [2012-06-06 04:47:18 +0000 UTC]

Haha, indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

disrhythmic In reply to ??? [2012-06-05 20:28:20 +0000 UTC]

Brilliant, as usual.

I think I'm closer to the 'no description whatsoever' end of the scale... but then again, I write flash.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Inkfish7 In reply to disrhythmic [2012-06-05 20:52:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, glad you liked it! For my own writing, I think it's more of a middle ground, but when I ask myself which density I prefer to read.... Haha, I have no answer. The writer just has to make their choice work, I guess.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

disrhythmic In reply to Inkfish7 [2012-06-06 03:17:33 +0000 UTC]

Exactly. If it's done well, as a reader I don't really care about the mechanics of it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev |