HOME | DD

JoeyJazz In reply to 0xyn [2010-04-17 18:32:09 +0000 UTC]

They are not duplicated

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

0xyn In reply to JoeyJazz [2010-04-17 18:33:06 +0000 UTC]

Mhh.. sorry for the mistake.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeyJazz In reply to 0xyn [2010-04-17 18:34:41 +0000 UTC]

Now that I look at it closely - there is a tiny part on the right side of the moon that looks really close to that on the planet, but that's just coincidence.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Hector42 In reply to JoeyJazz [2010-04-28 00:02:02 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry but actually it looks so damn similar that I belive you are lying. I can identify a ton of duplicated features on the surface, so either you forgot about duplicating, or you are not telling the truth deliberately, or it really is the astronomically small chance of coincidence which would not be about one tiny fraction of the planet - like you say - but about the whole thing.
I have no problem with duplication, but I have a problem with lying. Or maybe you just forgot. Sorry about my intervention, but I can't help my sense of justice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeyJazz In reply to Hector42 [2010-04-28 06:09:00 +0000 UTC]

Y'know that justice is blind, right? In this case it works twice.

But now really - to be honest - I use the same texture base for planets. I change it once in a while, but since it has about 10000x10000px, I usually use it for 6-7 pictures in a row before the change. This doesn't mean that the planets are same, since I don't like to have 2 completely same objects in a picture. They just have a few similar features (not "a ton" like you said - that's complete bullshit - you obviously also can't help to exaggerate) from that texture base.

Here is comparison:
[link]

Normally I wouldn't even bother to answer on this crazy comment but I made that image and I know what resources I used and that I also spent some time making it. If you think it's duplicated (as I recall - bullshit), then you'll just have to live with it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hector42 In reply to JoeyJazz [2010-04-28 17:50:57 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I know that Justice is blind and belive it or not, I saw this statement coming. It doesn't do anything to the real topic though.
You comparison is a bit small. However, I layered your planets on top of each other and set one to "difference". You might get the point, the resulting image was pretty black. Except for 2 features. So maybe it's not technically duplicated and I want to say sorry for my former comment. But you must admit that the planets are not only similar but nearly identical, no matter on wich way the extreme similarity happened. So if you don't want 2 identical objects in your scene you might have sticked to this motto, no matter why the objects are (nearly) identical.
Sticking my nose into other people's stuff is neraly under control. But only nearly . Probably about as "nearly" as your two planets are congruent to each other .

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

JoeyJazz In reply to Hector42 [2010-04-28 19:41:05 +0000 UTC]

I know they look similar - I even adjusted the moon a bit after the first comment of our fellow deviant above - they looked more identical. The fact is, that now if you don't search for it on purpose - you won't see it. Shit, now I'm almost convinced they are too similar as well. Y'see what you are doing?
I'll find some time and change the moon a bit more... ...I hate readjusting things - the postwork is pain in the a**.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Hector42 In reply to JoeyJazz [2010-04-28 21:58:13 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, I wouldn't say that people won't see it, if they don't look intentionally for it. Okay, maybe I'm different, because I have the Asperger Syndrom and therefore notice tiny details much easier than even the whole thing lol.
Haha, after all my brainwashing succeeded *muhuhahaha* .

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

0xyn In reply to JoeyJazz [2010-04-17 18:39:25 +0000 UTC]

Okay, no problem, thanks for your reply (rare among the great artists like you )

👍: 0 ⏩: 0