HOME | DD

Published: 2008-08-04 22:52:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 1577; Favourites: 48; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
[*edit 8/12 - eventually this will be re - worked, lots to improve. Check the rampant derpitude on that panther, for one. ]Symbolist examination of the private iconography of dreams.
Brushes used -
Related content
Comments: 86
Veronika-Art In reply to ??? [2008-08-06 15:10:20 +0000 UTC]
Either way I love this kind of texture... and well the concept is totally beautiful... tell me.... what does it all represent?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
baba49 [2008-08-05 21:23:43 +0000 UTC]
I can hardly make up my mind which one I like better but if you beat me long enough I'd probably go for the original
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-06 10:57:56 +0000 UTC]
Ok I vote for the original without
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to baba49 [2008-08-06 12:20:20 +0000 UTC]
the SPANK emotie! Forgot we had that one
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
baba49 In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-08 15:40:29 +0000 UTC]
It's so usefull at times
Do you know this one ... I only just found it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to baba49 [2008-08-08 15:54:21 +0000 UTC]
OH that's going in the zoo - it's so cute!!!!
where did yo find him ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to baba49 [2008-08-08 16:39:49 +0000 UTC]
ohhhhhhhhh *dies* He looks like mine
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to baba49 [2008-08-08 22:52:53 +0000 UTC]
He's in 'Susan' -
[link]
just a little cartoon to fill out the composition
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to RosesAndThorns [2008-08-06 10:51:27 +0000 UTC]
me too - but here it definitely has a brassy/yellow cast . . . I do like how it unifies everything though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lamaitza In reply to ??? [2008-08-05 09:25:14 +0000 UTC]
i think this one is better because of the softness that antique filter adds to it, so it's more dream-ish.
but both of them are beautiful, can't they both stay?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to lamaitza [2008-08-06 10:52:36 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I'm not dumping anything - I like Scraps as much as Featured; my scraps has more activity than the main gallery
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lamaitza In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-06 11:34:15 +0000 UTC]
haha,well in this case both of your deviations will be happy
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ms-Sarah In reply to ??? [2008-08-05 07:06:36 +0000 UTC]
I think this one captures the dream state more beautifully, but I don't think either of them deserve to be in scraps!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to Ms-Sarah [2008-08-06 10:54:08 +0000 UTC]
hmmm - scraps for me isn't the trash, it's more active than the main gallery
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JakobaHavinga In reply to ??? [2008-08-05 06:01:31 +0000 UTC]
I like this one more, I think. It all fits better together. Green is not disturbing red anymore, and red seems warmer. Though... perhaps the rest of this work becomes a bit too red now.
Ah well, this one I'll anyway
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ErikDShipley In reply to ??? [2008-08-05 03:55:20 +0000 UTC]
I think the colors in this one look richer. The gold makes the red stand out more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
viridianeye [2008-08-05 02:01:13 +0000 UTC]
I really like the colors in this one best! If you like, you can keep it this color, and re-put in a the details over it to match the colors. If that seems like overkill...than I still like this one best! Nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to viridianeye [2008-08-06 12:26:31 +0000 UTC]
Thank you! - actually some of the details lost don't even need to be there, as they were pretty shaky to begin with.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
joeyv7 In reply to NestR [2008-08-05 00:21:23 +0000 UTC]
Yes, because I like the composition of this. But not for awhile - I got to hating this thing for awhile there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-05 00:52:54 +0000 UTC]
. . . and I'm back to hating it now.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
e-c-h In reply to ??? [2008-08-04 23:20:46 +0000 UTC]
I really like the idea of the colors molding together more but I agree here, that filter made it lose a bit of quality. but u don't have to use a filter like that: You can fool with it to your taste using the "adjust/hue saturation" I bet you could get more to the way you want it trying those on the original version.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
joeyv7 In reply to e-c-h [2008-08-05 01:02:00 +0000 UTC]
well, I tweaked it as much as I trust myself to tweak right now - #1, that is If it's OK, great, but if it's awful, let me know.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
joeyv7 In reply to e-c-h [2008-08-05 00:22:16 +0000 UTC]
yeah . . . lemme try that
*cannot believe I'm going to tweak it yet again*
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
e-c-h In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-05 01:10:05 +0000 UTC]
U is daring!!! But it's all in the name of artistic experiment. The great thing about computers are save, and undo
btw, get my email?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
joeyv7 In reply to joeyv7 [2008-08-05 00:27:42 +0000 UTC]
oh for God's sake, that's what I shouldv'e done in the first place How'd I forget that? I've been doing this with layers for ages, I forgot you can do it to the whole dang thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |