HOME | DD

Published: 2014-01-07 06:39:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 40841; Favourites: 863; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Because I said I would do this lol I managed to pick unique type combos that don't overlap...and these are my fav Pokemon too UwU I just realized this can be a pretty fun wifi team too LMFAO
Kanto: Venusaur (Grass/Poison)
Johto: Tyranitar (Rock/Dark)
Hoenn: Swampert (Water/Ground)
Sinnoh: Rotom Heat (Electric/Fire)
Unova: Swoobat (Psychic/Flying)
Kalos: Aegislash (Steel/Ghost)
If you want to try it, the original form is here:
EDIT: Rotom is not a legendary you guys :UUUUU
In each of the 4 sections of the National Pokedex (Kanto, Johto, Hoenn, and Sinnoh), the legendary trio Pokemon are the first legendary Pokemon listed. (Please note that doesn't necessarily mean that all Pokemon between a legendary trio and the last event legend of the same region are legendary - Dratini, Dragonair, Dragonite, Larvitar, Pupitar, and Tyranitar are listed between legends, but are themselves psuedo-legendary Pokemon.)
EDIT2: Also let me break down the arguments that are made for Rotom being a legendary
>1.There is only one per game
False. You see one in DPPT yes, but in BW/BW2 you can encounter multiple ones in Dream World; if Rotom was legendary, why can I find them in one of the DW maps so easily? Most legendaries are given away via event and no event is required for it. Also in XY you can find several Rotom in Lost Hotel trash cans.
Also by this logic, You can also say a starter Pokemon is legendary since you see encounter one per game. But you obviously don't.
>2.It has legendary music when you battle it (pokemon diamond/pearl/platinum)
This is the most common reason and despite it being the most valid reason, it's a really weak point.
>3.It is put as legendary in the Pokemon Ultimate Handbook
Given that is this not really backed officially by Nintendo (it's published by Scholastic and despite some of the titles saying "official," the author itself is not a nintendo worker nor is associated with the actual game company), that assumption is still not very solid. The authors themselves are imposing their own guesses onto the book and does not cite any word from Nintendo saying this. The book considered that as an error so NOT EVEN RELEVANT
FYI, FURTHER BITCHING ABOUT ROTOM'S LEGENDARY/NON-LEGENARY STATUS WILL BE FLAGGED AS SPAM DUE TO IT NOT BEING AT ALL RELEVANT TO THE DEVIATION
Related content
Comments: 198
DarkElementEX In reply to ??? [2014-01-08 00:43:29 +0000 UTC]
I like youre chooses, I prefer mow form rotom more though. (yay swampert )
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gottabeperfect [2014-01-07 23:42:12 +0000 UTC]
I like your diverse type choices, and I agree with your statement of Rotom not technically being a legendary. It is allowed in official play for the VGCs and on the Smogon boards, two areas of battle which strictly regulate teams and do not allow legendaries into certain play, thus I feel that is the largest proof needed to show that Rotom is allowable as a non-legendary Pokemon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KyamosTheStubborn [2014-01-07 23:41:51 +0000 UTC]
I know nothing about pokemon, and still, i know that rotom is not a legendary pokemon xD
BTW, although i don't really like so much pokemon, i have to admit that i love how you draw them! And this isn't a exception! i love how Aegislash looks, its Awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Supah-Shugo [2014-01-07 22:56:14 +0000 UTC]
Another reason Rotom isn't a legendary is that you can breed it~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dragontamer155 [2014-01-07 22:11:52 +0000 UTC]
is that mimi? wahhh jordannnnn..... btw hows school? hope ur doin awesome miss doctor-cartoonist! hehe i prefer blaziken, but still I LOVE URRR ART *cheren fan bo- girl moment*
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gecko-Comics [2014-01-07 21:58:27 +0000 UTC]
epic team, kynim!! I especially love your first 3 choices (and Swoobat of course, because Mimi is awesome)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RadBlueCinderblock In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 21:57:11 +0000 UTC]
Oh man, it bugs me so much whenever someone calls Rotom a legendary.
That rotom looks so adorable though. eee~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
eggson-bren In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 20:47:27 +0000 UTC]
YES SOMEONE WHO ACTUALLY LIKES AEGISLASH FINALLY
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gecko-Comics In reply to eggson-bren [2014-01-07 21:57:58 +0000 UTC]
who DOESN'T like Aegislash? I haven't found any Aegislash haters yet...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
emmerlaus In reply to Gecko-Comics [2014-01-08 00:07:56 +0000 UTC]
Well you found one XD
Honedge is awesome and Doublade acceptable... but Aegislash will never be a Pokemon I like, no matter how strong he is.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
emmerlaus In reply to Gecko-Comics [2014-01-08 04:11:00 +0000 UTC]
His apparance is alien for me, first off. Its the same for Bronzong and Bronzor: if the design dont appeal to me, I wont like it.
Second, I dont play competively. I dont have a need for a Pokemon hyper-strong, breed for better EVs ( Or IVs, not sure which) and the like. So I dont choose Pokemon because they are strong but because they appeal to me.
For exemple, I would choose Dunsparce over Togekiss anytime for a Para-flich strategy anytime, just because I like Dunsparce look and concept better
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gecko-Comics In reply to emmerlaus [2014-01-08 05:59:23 +0000 UTC]
ok cool just curious. it's nice to get a bunch of different perspectives. I completely respect liking a Pokemon because of its design. If it doesn't look awesome or adorable, it's hard to like it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Ultimatemew2 In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 19:57:20 +0000 UTC]
I own an Aegislash. I was looking forever for a female one to call Fi, but I said "screw it" and captured a male one. Its name is Ghirahim with a naughty nature and he is a good Aegislash. (Took damn near forever to find a Dusk Stone, though)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DrillBoysGirl In reply to Ultimatemew2 [2014-01-07 21:35:11 +0000 UTC]
I see what you did there! Ghirahim with a Naughty nature is PERFECT!
I haven't been able to run into ANY Male Honedge, in X or Y. I have two females though, Sinclaire and Bruinhilda. I'm having issues finding Shiny and Dawn stones. I'm not very good at the Super Secret Training, and it's random anyway. Whatever happened to the Underground from Sinnoh? I liked that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
s1gnalbeams [2014-01-07 18:17:51 +0000 UTC]
finally someone said that rotom is not a legendary
it doesnt have the STATS of a legendary; to be considered a legend, it must have a base stat total of 640+. rotom's is way below that, maybe in the 400-500 range, even in its other forms. it also can breed, which with the exception of manaphy, legendaries cannot do.
so stop yo complaining and just enjoy the art work that this lovely person has made B]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
BlazeDriver In reply to s1gnalbeams [2014-01-07 23:21:24 +0000 UTC]
Most legendaries don't even go over 600. wtf are you talking about?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
s1gnalbeams In reply to BlazeDriver [2014-01-08 07:00:27 +0000 UTC]
reshiram - 680
zekrom - 680
ho-oh - 680
lugia - 680
mewtwo - 680 (if you count its megas, they're over 700)
groudon - 680
kyogre - 680
arceus - 720
the smaller legends, such as darkrai, shaymin, mew, etc, are only 600. the main legends go over. B]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BlazeDriver In reply to s1gnalbeams [2014-01-08 11:45:13 +0000 UTC]
You just said legendaries. You said nothing about mains or not.
Some don't even go to 600. A lot of the trios are only 580 :/ Pretty much the only condition to being a legendary is only being legally obtainable one-per save file, except manaphy because they forced in a pointless baby pe-evolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EmpressLaurosaurus In reply to s1gnalbeams [2014-01-07 19:06:03 +0000 UTC]
I agree. Except for that, Rotom isn't an event like Victini, Mew, Celebi or Jirachi
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
s1gnalbeams In reply to EmpressLaurosaurus [2014-01-08 07:02:06 +0000 UTC]
exactly! though the event Pokemon don't really count as legends because their base stats aren't over 600 because all of their stats are just 600 on its own, more like psuedo-legends if you ask me
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EmpressLaurosaurus In reply to s1gnalbeams [2014-01-08 09:02:44 +0000 UTC]
somehow, yeah, they also have different names in Japanese, talking about these event pokémon.
however, they are strong and I personally love Victini
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cyolx In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 18:16:54 +0000 UTC]
I did this once except I also excluded starter pokemon. Cloyster, Scizor, Gardervoir, Weavile, Whimsicott, and Goodra. I would've swapped Florges out with Goodra, but I wanted some chance with not being completely walled by steels.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Cassya77 In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 17:36:20 +0000 UTC]
awesome team, and why the crud would people call rotom legendary, he can breed into more rotoms, since when can legendaries breed into more of themselves??? Not even manapy the only breeding legendary can do that it makes crappy phiones
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Exgallion In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 17:30:00 +0000 UTC]
Mine would have to be, Marowak (Ground), Lanturn (Water/Electric), Absol (Dark), Luxray (Electric), Hydreigon (Dark/Dragon), and Aegislash (Ghost/Steel).
In ranks of difficulty, Hoenn was the easiest to choose from, followed by Sinnoh, Unova, Kalos, Kanto, and Johto the hardest to pick from. Thought of using the Red Gyarados you get in Johto, but decided against it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JonnytheShadowfox In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 17:29:29 +0000 UTC]
Nice team you got there Kylee. And I just noticed that this team it pretty balanced, too XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Miere93 In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 17:13:03 +0000 UTC]
tyranitar has always been one of my favorite pokemon :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
killcode102 [2014-01-07 16:39:51 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! Three of these are actually at the moment included in my PokeMon team in Y, Tyranitar, Venusaur, and Aegislash. (well... at least I have the Dusk Stone for evolving Doublade and I am just working at training him up before I evolve, so I think that does/should count)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RibbonTheGrowlithe [2014-01-07 15:52:10 +0000 UTC]
Why would people think Rotom is a legendary? The crap? Seriously? ;n;
Its too weak to be a legendary, it can breed (That Manaphy crap aside.), and you can find an infinite number of them in X and Y.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Gameb9oy [2014-01-07 14:29:17 +0000 UTC]
Was unova's fav somewhat influenced by ur nuzlocke? Even though Unova's pokemon designs got criticized by reviewers, I think it actually allows people 2 have diverse opinions of them, which is fitting for a region based on the USA. (My personal team would b Gen 1 Arcanine, gen 2 Umbreon gen 3 Swampert gen 4 lucario gen 5 Bisharp & gen 6 Sylveon)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SophieSuffocate [2014-01-07 14:03:05 +0000 UTC]
I have never considered Rotom a legendary... Wtf is wrong with people.
On another note, I think I will try this some time, looks super fun!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tonko In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 13:40:51 +0000 UTC]
Swampert wooo!! I think mine would be... Snorlax, Granbull--no, shit, that's two normals. Ummm... damn that means I can't have Furret either. Uhhh. Or Ursaring. Huh I'm noticing a theme here. Togetic? But then I couldn't put Togekiss in for DPPt... I guess making this with all super-favourites isn't really viable for people who tend towards one type!
I love how you drew Tyranitar!! More crafty/thoughtful than I usually see them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
emmerlaus In reply to Tonko [2014-01-07 17:28:27 +0000 UTC]
Grandbull is a Fairy Type and if you pick dual types, it might be easier to have Normal type Pokemon. Oh, and also, the rule about the type restriction is optionnal
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tonko In reply to emmerlaus [2014-01-08 00:34:54 +0000 UTC]
Oh right I keep forgetting about Fairy!
I know it's optional, it's fine either way, it's just as much fun to sort out stuff with a restriction as not, hehe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TheEvilWalrus [2014-01-07 12:35:49 +0000 UTC]
definitely doing this! does it have to be a viable competitive team?
p.s. you put no legendaries but you used heatran as an example that might confuse people haha
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ky-nim In reply to TheEvilWalrus [2014-01-07 12:54:45 +0000 UTC]
Nah it doesn't.
I did say those rules were optional so if you ignore the legendary rule that other rule is still viable :U
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Southrobin In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 12:32:04 +0000 UTC]
Forever loving your style dood, really neat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
olivierBR1 In reply to ??? [2014-01-07 11:45:52 +0000 UTC]
i tought rotom was legendary pokemon .-. it even says so in pokemon diamond/pearl guide, he's the weakest legendary
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
ky-nim In reply to olivierBR1 [2014-01-07 12:55:30 +0000 UTC]
Not according to every other Pokemon site :U
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
olivierBR1 In reply to ky-nim [2014-01-07 20:41:36 +0000 UTC]
it's debatable...
Reasons it is legendary:
1.There is only one per game
2.It has legendary music when you battle it (pokemon diamond/pearl/platinum)
3.It is put as legendary in the Pokemon Ultimate Handbook
Reasons it is not a legendary:
1.It can breed.
2.It is weak
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Atlanta-Hammy In reply to olivierBR1 [2014-01-07 22:16:03 +0000 UTC]
-coughs- sorry your supposed source has been confirmed a error man
Further Reading of: Rotom
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev | | Next =>