HOME | DD

Published: 2007-02-05 12:44:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 15429; Favourites: 408; Downloads: 430
Redirect to original
Description
A re capture of the perimeter.Thanks to for the feature on his journal. [link]
Thanks to for the feature on his journal too.
[link]
Thanks to for the feature too.
[link]
Thanks to for the feature on his journal and news.
[link]
Related content
Comments: 225
onewithdarkness In reply to ??? [2007-02-07 00:46:40 +0000 UTC]
love the colors in this shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to onewithdarkness [2007-02-07 01:41:34 +0000 UTC]
Thanks alot. It's the natural colours actually. Credits should go to the architecture then.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onewithdarkness In reply to LethalVirus [2007-02-09 04:38:05 +0000 UTC]
amen, they are excellenbt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
onewithdarkness In reply to LethalVirus [2007-02-10 16:41:14 +0000 UTC]
take a stand amte, and touche'
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iszzy In reply to ??? [2007-02-06 16:14:26 +0000 UTC]
wow bro!! amazing....power giler ...
i love the reflections bro..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to CommanderDex [2007-02-06 15:14:24 +0000 UTC]
Thanks alot bro for the .
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
prevailinginsanity In reply to ??? [2007-02-06 00:15:05 +0000 UTC]
A lot of shapes and contours..
Love the reflections..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
prevailinginsanity In reply to LethalVirus [2007-02-06 15:41:42 +0000 UTC]
You're always welcome, Helmy..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osox In reply to ??? [2007-02-05 18:34:20 +0000 UTC]
i prefer this one the colors are warmer and the reflections of the windows is i don't know more Neat
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to Osox [2007-02-07 01:45:19 +0000 UTC]
Thanks alot my fren, Oso. This is the natural colours unlike the other which is heavily edited by me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Osox In reply to LethalVirus [2007-02-07 03:23:01 +0000 UTC]
some times natural stuff give better results
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to Osox [2007-02-07 03:25:44 +0000 UTC]
Yes that's true and I totally agree with you. That's why I didn't do much on this. Only just increase the tones and contrasts abit so that it won't look flat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZephonSoul In reply to ??? [2007-02-05 16:50:21 +0000 UTC]
I remember the original version, and though I was a bit not sure about that, I see huge improvements in this one!
This is really impressive my friend! If it wasn't for the lighter editing, I'd probably tell by the look it is a photo of Bosniak!
I should only note that the composition is slightly unbalanced with the center of the triangle barely shifted to the left. That's minimal though!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to ZephonSoul [2007-02-06 15:20:49 +0000 UTC]
Yes, I just leave it as it is. Was abit lazy though to edit as usual and so just leave it as it is. Yes it is, I agree with you, abit shifted. Thanks alot Alessandro.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
snowMermaid In reply to ??? [2007-02-05 14:15:25 +0000 UTC]
feeeweet!!! cantik seh,...i like the touch of clouds...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to snowMermaid [2007-02-06 15:43:45 +0000 UTC]
Trima kasih. The clouds that day was like that. Didn't do much actually on this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
feebonacci In reply to ??? [2007-02-05 14:04:52 +0000 UTC]
great cap great building WOW !!
-
is that a fish eye you use ? cuz i see 10 mm on the report of the pic ! can you tell me the reference of the lens ? pliiiiiiiiiiiiizzz !!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LethalVirus In reply to feebonacci [2007-02-07 02:43:15 +0000 UTC]
Thanks alot Axel. Tough question this is but I'll try my best to response. The difference is that from a wide angle lens perspective, the angle of view is much wider than the normal lens (an eg. [link] ) and for the fish eye lens or also called peleng lens, the angle of view is always circular (an eg. [link] ). Another way is to see the focal length. A wide lens focal length range will range from 10mm to 24mm and as for the fish eye or peleng will be from 8mm to 15mm and if not mistaken normally fish eye is a prime lens which means only one focal length.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>