HOME | DD

P0KEM0NA In reply to XRaeineX [2012-09-13 20:36:03 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

XRaeineX In reply to P0KEM0NA [2012-09-13 22:05:24 +0000 UTC]

that's pretty cool

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0KEM0NA In reply to shadowgal12345 [2012-09-13 20:36:11 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0KEM0NA In reply to DewYunomi [2012-09-13 20:36:22 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HakoWako In reply to ??? [2012-09-13 19:26:37 +0000 UTC]

!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

The-MoonSquid In reply to ??? [2012-09-13 19:22:14 +0000 UTC]

you make me so happy i don't know what to do with myself

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

P0KEM0NA In reply to The-MoonSquid [2012-09-13 20:36:32 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheOddFungi In reply to ??? [2012-09-13 19:14:50 +0000 UTC]

Win~

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

P0KEM0NA In reply to TheOddFungi [2012-09-13 20:36:37 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0KEM0NA In reply to reirarei-chan [2012-09-13 20:34:35 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

reirarei-chan In reply to P0KEM0NA [2012-09-13 20:43:51 +0000 UTC]

Don't you think it's a little immature to advertise yourself on someone's deviation?

You have a really nice gallery, but I find it just plain rude to the artist that your advertising yourself on his work, that he's worked hard on. If you're intending to shamelessly advertise yourself, at least have the consideration for the artist to note people, or even comment on their page, instead of cluttering Runxforest's deviation.

Whould you like someone advertising themselves all over pictures you've work hard on?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0KEM0NA In reply to dimsumbum [2012-09-13 20:34:42 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dimsumbum In reply to black3825 [2012-09-13 18:36:41 +0000 UTC]

AHAHAHA. i see what you did there.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

black3825 In reply to dimsumbum [2012-09-13 18:40:33 +0000 UTC]

I did too, I thought someone was instead going ot correct me saying 'Ghastly' instead of 'Gastly', both of which are actualy correct words...

But I could've improved the joke with Gastly... Which I sadly forgot to do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dimsumbum In reply to black3825 [2012-09-14 06:44:05 +0000 UTC]

haha i still got the implied joke either way i didn't even notice that you hadn't spelled the name Gastly right. it was still awesome. gave me a good laugh.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

black3825 In reply to dimsumbum [2012-09-14 13:23:11 +0000 UTC]

Well, I did not yet intend to use the name Gastly. I said Ghastly (Which is a correct word.) because I wanted to nod towards the pun. But forgot that the corruption of said word which is Gastly also could make it more punny.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZyuTheLast In reply to Spirit1993 [2012-09-13 18:32:20 +0000 UTC]

It doesn't really make a difference in english. the root word is Oppa and the "n" sound is usually not translated through romanizing the word. the "n" sound is only an additive to the word meaning to signify he's talking about himself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ivan-ElTerrible In reply to ??? [2012-09-13 17:43:43 +0000 UTC]

Puns like this are funny by nature

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

P0KEM0NA In reply to KagamineStar2 [2012-09-13 20:35:02 +0000 UTC]

this is da stuff ([link] ) gangnam style

👍: 0 ⏩: 0