HOME | DD

Published: 2009-09-09 02:06:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 19379; Favourites: 427; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
When *duss005 posted his version of Wondy: [link] I was really impressed and wanted to do a little homage. Hope y'all digs.Wonder Woman © DC Comics
Image © Steve Schaffer
Design - Dustin Nguyen
Textures from: www.cgtextures.com
Tools: Photoshop CS
Time: 12-15 hours
Related content
Comments: 99
MightyMorphinPower4 In reply to ??? [2009-09-09 14:46:54 +0000 UTC]
wonderful work here on wonder woman
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MightyMorphinPower4 In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-11 12:47:34 +0000 UTC]
your welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Voodoodwarf In reply to ??? [2009-09-09 14:32:01 +0000 UTC]
I like this soft but intensive color style here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChescaTipton In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-10 06:45:58 +0000 UTC]
You're quite welcome, hun
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to hippie-girl [2009-09-09 21:01:17 +0000 UTC]
Hope that's a good sigh...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hippie-girl In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-10 00:55:45 +0000 UTC]
Um... well, see, I'm torn between my feminism and my bisexuality...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to hippie-girl [2009-09-10 01:01:14 +0000 UTC]
Well... [insert something witty and thought-provoking]
In all seriousness, though, I think WW is a walking example of your dilemma. Yes she's gorgeous and is scantily clad, be she's also all about women's rights and gender equality...she's almost a paradox...
As far as feminism vs. bisexuality... I think you can still be attracted to a scantily clad woman without said woman's attire becoming an issue right? I mean, gay, straight, bi...don't we all like to see the people we're attracted to half naked??
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hippie-girl In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-10 01:18:14 +0000 UTC]
Haha, indeed. Nothing wrong with a little objectification, but it gets tricky when that object is also supposed to carry a feminist message. Some might argue that the two should be kept separate, but then again, it is a comic book. Fanservice is kind of a big part of it! I feel like if you really want to boil it down to something, boil it down to the poses. Superheroines can still look strong in skimpy stripper costumes as long as their gestures are assertive, sturdy, and realistic. But if they're breaking their backs pushing their ginormous boobs out in a passive, vulnerable pose, then... no. Just no! That shit ain't gonna win a fight!
I'm actually doing part of my thesis on the dissonance between the way superheroines are written and the way they're drawn. Should be interesting.
[/ramble]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to hippie-girl [2009-09-10 01:21:03 +0000 UTC]
So, then, this would be a negative example...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
hippie-girl In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-10 01:26:31 +0000 UTC]
Haha, well, maybe a little. But we can't be PC all the time!
Besides, she's clearly just relaxing in this painting. She's not fighting crime. I think one could argue that there's nothing wrong with WW being sexy on her "off" time. ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mickezilla [2009-09-09 03:55:44 +0000 UTC]
Woah. That's the sexeist Wonder woman I've ever seen. I like the Body frame.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to Mickezilla [2009-09-09 21:01:28 +0000 UTC]
Thanks! I appreciate it!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mickezilla In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-10 02:14:19 +0000 UTC]
No really the body frame was very hot.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to Mickezilla [2009-09-10 22:15:39 +0000 UTC]
Thanks (but I did have some very sweet reference...)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vmf007 In reply to StephenSchaffer [2009-09-09 22:44:33 +0000 UTC]
hey, did you check out my Linda Carter? critique it when you do ok? thanks in advance!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephenSchaffer In reply to vmf007 [2009-09-10 00:35:14 +0000 UTC]
Your LC looks pretty good... I'd watch your edges... they're a little rough... other than that it's a great likeness! Keep it up!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LavenderBlade [2009-09-09 02:18:11 +0000 UTC]
Damn, that Bald Eagle is amazing...as is WW! I love the colors here.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev |