HOME | DD

TomWilcox In reply to ??? [2005-01-25 02:21:11 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much for your comments. I appreciate the feedback.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomWilcox In reply to littledeviltoo [2005-01-22 18:13:05 +0000 UTC]

Hi Lenora,

Thanks so much and for the Fav.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

littledeviltoo In reply to TomWilcox [2005-01-24 15:53:18 +0000 UTC]

No thanks needed.. it was my pleasure.. my extreme viewing pleasure actually to get to take more time to stare at it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bej In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 15:07:37 +0000 UTC]

Damn Tom! That is crazy hot! I'm so used to seeing opaque layers used in apophysis with a lot of your work and some other deviants; now, this got my attention!

way to go!
BeJ

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to bej [2005-01-22 18:10:06 +0000 UTC]

Hi Jon,

Wow! Thanks for that wonderful comment. I will be submitting another piece today that has a lot of "Fog" in it ..... Abstract 432.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

graphicsontheweb-UK In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 14:29:56 +0000 UTC]

Nice.

Ann

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to graphicsontheweb-UK [2005-01-22 18:06:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Ann.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PSPMistress In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 12:43:27 +0000 UTC]

Such rich metallic warmth!!

Likes this...its warm, smooth and cool to the touch!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to PSPMistress [2005-01-22 18:02:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomWilcox In reply to tsheva [2005-01-22 18:00:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot and thanks for the Fav. I gave up finding a title so I just made up a number.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomWilcox In reply to sta12s [2005-01-22 07:24:57 +0000 UTC]

awwww. Thanks!

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aeires In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 04:14:28 +0000 UTC]

Looks great, Tom. I love white and orange together. Bit more bright than your usual, but I think it works well with the motion and edge of this one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to Aeires [2005-01-22 05:44:00 +0000 UTC]

Hi Jeff,

Yeah, the colors are really strong in this. I built this from my "Atmosphere" piece I did awhile ago.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomWilcox In reply to grubin [2005-01-22 05:32:07 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot.

Funny you should ask. I had this rendering at 5000x7500 @ 500 density (I always use filter radius of .2 - Oversample at 1.0) for 2 days only to bring it up as a solid black window! I wanted an awesome render on this one. So I re-rendered at my usual 3500x5250 - 200 density and it rendered in about 5 hours. I reduced the image for my gallery in Photoshop Elements. I'm really pleased with the results.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TomWilcox In reply to trinity-77 [2005-01-22 05:34:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much!

Never noticed the ". What does that mean?

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trinity-77 In reply to TomWilcox [2005-01-22 05:39:20 +0000 UTC]

well your status now says your a senior member. you had no idea?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to trinity-77 [2005-01-22 05:47:22 +0000 UTC]

I got a notice awhile ago that I was added to the "Seniors" friends list but I still don't know what that is. Is it for "old" people. I'm 60.

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

trinity-77 In reply to TomWilcox [2005-01-22 05:52:01 +0000 UTC]

hmmm i really have no idea. i looked on the help to try and find out. and it ... was far from help.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

asymons In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 03:36:27 +0000 UTC]

mmmm.... a beautiful feeling of "light" to this Tom..... I love the light and shade elements at work here....

gorgeous...

well done.....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to asymons [2005-01-22 05:36:23 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much!

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KPEKEP In reply to ??? [2005-01-22 03:35:56 +0000 UTC]

so clean ... awesome effect

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TomWilcox In reply to KPEKEP [2005-01-22 05:41:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks! Not sure why but this one really came out intense. Dumb luck?

Tom

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

KPEKEP In reply to TomWilcox [2005-01-22 08:12:29 +0000 UTC]

hehe ... Me so was lucky

👍: 0 ⏩: 0