seebugaa In reply to Pasperti [2022-12-14 10:17:50 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

Pasperti In reply to seebugaa [2022-12-15 00:03:52 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seebugaa In reply to MR-NIK [2011-11-01 12:15:38 +0000 UTC]

thx for the comment, well, what is within terms of use, showing a vagina is ok? spreading is not ok? i dont get the difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MR-NIK In reply to seebugaa [2011-11-01 12:19:13 +0000 UTC]

crotch visible = ok
spread labia = not ok

it's just how they wanna regulate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MR-NIK In reply to MR-NIK [2011-11-01 12:21:20 +0000 UTC]

start a tumblr account or blogger account instead.
There infact is a difference between nude art and porn. I'm sorry you cannot tell them apart.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

seebugaa In reply to MR-NIK [2011-11-01 13:10:27 +0000 UTC]

what is the difference? wheres the line? its strange how taschen sells tons of books with nude art that most people would consider porn?! dahmane or tony ward and many more do hardcore stuff and they still sell their "porn art" in galleries and publish books! i dont think there is a difference, its just that society considers this or that as pornographic and i really dont care about that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MR-NIK In reply to seebugaa [2011-11-01 13:13:35 +0000 UTC]

Yeah but you cant say that nude art is the same as porn when it can have a meaning that is not sexual.
I appreciate pornographic art too of course however I can tell when something is pandering to dumb instincts or if it holds a little intelligence.

And yes the line is blurry, but there's a difference.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

seebugaa In reply to MR-NIK [2011-11-01 13:24:07 +0000 UTC]

ok, there can be explicite art that is not erotic or sexual whatsoever. i agree.
but if it is intended to be erotic or sexual, then, to some extend it always intends to pander your sexual instinct,not?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MR-NIK In reply to seebugaa [2011-11-01 14:39:04 +0000 UTC]

There's a way to do it where you can achieve sexual excitement without appearing to have very little substance and intelligence.
Everyone's sexual desires are different of course.

However, this is meant to be an art site where you attempt to place a bit of integrity in your images. Artistic nudity can involve sex, but doesn't have to.
Blatant pussy opening is just.. well. functional in showing people your cervix and not saying much about your sexuality or saying anything at all other than "You want to fuck this"
Especially when you present them in a series like a cheap porn site would.

I guess it does provoke a response, but its like.. you know when you hear a joke told in the most obnoxious way with too much explaining making the punch line too obvious? Or reliance on profanity way too much or toilet humour. It diminishes the humour if overdone, makes it feel juvenile like an Adam Sandler movie.

Erotic photography that regresses to being purely functional porn with nothing of value or merit in it diminishes its capability to be regarded as art.
That's my personal opinion of course but I have quite loose standards as it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

seebugaa In reply to MR-NIK [2011-11-01 12:21:16 +0000 UTC]

ok, thx, so i guess in the worst case my spreadshots get deleted?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MR-NIK In reply to seebugaa [2011-11-01 12:22:06 +0000 UTC]

You get banned. Possibly reported already actually.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0