HOME | DD

8BitLola — More or Less

Published: 2016-04-17 19:13:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 178359; Favourites: 5052; Downloads: 6547
Redirect to original
Description  twitter.com/8BitLola
 8bitlola.tumblr.com
 instagram.com/8BitLola
Related content
Comments: 554

DrNanaDeviantart In reply to ??? [2018-02-16 00:56:06 +0000 UTC]

Can't argue with that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SajjukKhar [2018-02-14 12:52:00 +0000 UTC]

So, lacy and frilly....and love the slightly messy hair with the lights and shadow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jimss [2018-02-14 00:36:23 +0000 UTC]

OMG sexy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lowwlyy666 [2018-02-13 18:01:25 +0000 UTC]

PERFECT   

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Boclander [2018-02-13 14:40:01 +0000 UTC]

Do we know who's this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkstarhammer [2018-02-13 12:44:58 +0000 UTC]

that's what true love looks like.    

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bobbycorn [2018-02-13 10:42:33 +0000 UTC]

this page is very sexual

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

emmerlaus [2018-02-13 06:31:48 +0000 UTC]

She have not posted any new pictures for what, a year?

She is gorgeous... and I miss her updates. 

Photography is an art and she is a beautiful model. The lightening is perfect and sensuality is her theme. 

8bitLola, I hope you will come back in Deviantart one day and ignore the haters. It's the only way to be happy because you'll always find someone who don't agree with your choices in life. 

And even if you never come back and post on social medias, I still respect your decision if it make you happy. No matter where you are today, I hope you found you own happiness. Life your life to the fullest.

I rise my glass to you... one of the most beautiful woman I have ever seeing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zib-0 [2018-02-13 00:39:39 +0000 UTC]

You know not everything is art. Art and what's beautiful is largely determined by the geometric properties of a piece. This is the geometry of god himself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Albinopfirsichsaft [2018-02-12 20:24:18 +0000 UTC]

Why is this worse than a shirtless guy? Haha
Guys, it's just boobs. About 50% of people have boobs, you know? And everyone has nipples, what a drama. Get over it

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SajjukKhar In reply to Albinopfirsichsaft [2018-02-14 12:53:17 +0000 UTC]

Actually, everyone technically has boobs, not everyone has mammary glands.
Some men have mammary glands.

And some of us guys develop them as a side effect from medication (nukes certain pharma company)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

photoedfade In reply to Albinopfirsichsaft [2018-02-13 04:22:24 +0000 UTC]

true. but it is still sexualy arousing for most men. that is the problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SajjukKhar In reply to photoedfade [2018-02-14 12:54:52 +0000 UTC]

And not sexually arousing for women at all?
If you want to get into things, some people are sexually aroused by shoulders, calves, thighs, the nape of the neck...

So, let's just not show anything, lest someone may be turned on by it.

Or is it that fact that men may be turned on that it's bad, but it's ok if a woman is sexually aroused?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photoedfade In reply to SajjukKhar [2018-02-14 13:07:15 +0000 UTC]

I didn't really mean it like that

Of course there are women who get aroused by this too. And yes people are attracted to those things. It isn't bad. I just came up with some random reason without thinking. Sorry. Tho I don't feel that this person should delete this photo. If a kid finds it then it is a parental problem not a da problem. Considering you have to be 14+ to be on here

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SajjukKhar In reply to photoedfade [2018-02-15 03:16:42 +0000 UTC]

More like you are supposed to be 14+, but there is no enforcement, even if a person comes out and states they are below the requirement

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photoedfade In reply to SajjukKhar [2018-02-15 04:21:16 +0000 UTC]

So? Still not their fault. They trust that the person will believe them that they are not allowed. They made the rule, and the kid broke it. It is a parental issue if the 7 year old finds this and the parent doesn't know

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SajjukKhar In reply to photoedfade [2018-02-15 05:19:28 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I totally agree it's a parental issue.
But also it is an administrative issue, because what is the point in having rules you do not actually enforce.

Thing is, a 7 year old is going to find things anyway.
And more than likely it will be in the newspaper, or a macy's catalog, etc.

I still find all the outrage to be quite funny, as it is what I stated elsewhere:  Selective Outrage.

There is plenty to be outraged about here.  This.......is tame lol.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photoedfade In reply to SajjukKhar [2018-02-15 12:54:21 +0000 UTC]

Ye.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Albinopfirsichsaft In reply to photoedfade [2018-02-13 08:40:27 +0000 UTC]

Then it's not her problem but theirs

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

photoedfade In reply to Albinopfirsichsaft [2018-02-13 13:01:45 +0000 UTC]

I know. I am just stating the main reason why people maybe butthurt about it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

IHazTehBucket In reply to ??? [2018-02-12 17:05:08 +0000 UTC]

less

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Philbear [2018-02-12 15:18:39 +0000 UTC]

What is art? It is what the artist conceives as art at the time of its creation. Who are we to judge?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IHazTehBucket In reply to Philbear [2018-02-12 17:09:18 +0000 UTC]

we are the people who judge art based on how good it is. basically what this website is about,  judgeing others art?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Philbear In reply to IHazTehBucket [2018-02-13 13:22:46 +0000 UTC]

But to say something isn't art based upon your taste is unfair and cruel. Let others judge based upon their taste and don't broadcast your opinion based upon prejudice and judgements. If some art offends then move on. Dont cast your judgment in it to discourage others to fave or like it. Move to Facebook if you want to do that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IHazTehBucket In reply to Philbear [2018-02-13 22:14:20 +0000 UTC]

i never said it wasn't.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

photoedfade In reply to IHazTehBucket [2018-02-13 04:23:21 +0000 UTC]

ye. but not saying that it isn't allowed. all art is allowed. you can hate it as much as you want just don't say that it isn't allowed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TalismanSkulls In reply to ??? [2018-02-12 11:36:59 +0000 UTC]

Damn, I love being straight

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Gwenhwyfar221b In reply to ??? [2018-02-12 11:18:14 +0000 UTC]

I don't have a problem with pictures like that in general, but only to show the breasts for the sake of showing breasts is a bit too attention seeking.
I don't see any artistic purpose. Just breasts, nice ones though, but just breasts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MemesMaterial In reply to ??? [2018-02-12 08:40:43 +0000 UTC]

Flagged as Spam

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IHazTehBucket In reply to MemesMaterial [2018-02-12 17:07:02 +0000 UTC]

i kinda agree and kind of don't, the artist can do whatever they want, they don't have to take down their gallery though. that's just going a little too far. but i mean, their art is showing exposed women for the sake of showing exposed women, to get attention.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BigBigZ In reply to ??? [2018-02-11 23:08:54 +0000 UTC]

less X3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DigitalArt-VTG In reply to ??? [2018-02-11 17:38:27 +0000 UTC]

Perfect light! 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Vargon62 In reply to ??? [2018-02-11 13:17:39 +0000 UTC]

in this case, less would be more!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FRlENDS In reply to ??? [2018-02-11 09:42:09 +0000 UTC]

less, wwaaaayyyy less. so less that you disappear out of the shot. and considering you seem like a thot posting these pics on a fucking WEBSITE WHERE TEENAGERS ARE I THINK YOU SHOULD DISAPPEAR.
BEGONE THOT   

👍: 0 ⏩: 5

WorstOtakuEver In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-13 00:38:03 +0000 UTC]

Dude, don't call someone a thot just because of a picture. Its rude, and more importantly, its being a douche.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRlENDS In reply to WorstOtakuEver [2018-02-13 00:39:45 +0000 UTC]

people call people who post pics like this call thots too, yknow

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WorstOtakuEver In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-13 00:50:00 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but it still doesn't make that right. Also, your comment is invalid. By deviantart's rules, any content that shows off a woman's privates is considered mature. This is juuuuuust short of that by covering said parts. Its the kids damn fault if they find this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRlENDS In reply to WorstOtakuEver [2018-02-13 00:53:02 +0000 UTC]

w/e dude

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SajjukKhar In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-14 12:56:19 +0000 UTC]

BEGONE TROLL!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MegaMaster528 In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-12 05:50:28 +0000 UTC]

You like to hate?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRlENDS In reply to MegaMaster528 [2018-02-12 05:53:15 +0000 UTC]

do you like to have children accidentally see this and make them get grounded?

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

matthew-lane In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-13 04:07:32 +0000 UTC]

dA is rated 14+, any kids on here aren't a platform problem, they are a failure of parental oversight in to media consumption problem.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MegaMaster528 In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-12 06:24:35 +0000 UTC]

Common first children don't like devianart and second they already know how they exist

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRlENDS In reply to MegaMaster528 [2018-02-12 07:02:14 +0000 UTC]

what the fuck are you even saying

i mean, seems like you arent in the USA and english isnt your native language but

are you trying to fucking say that children dont like dA when clearly THERES FUCKING CHILDREN HERE PROBABLY AROUND THE AGE OF  7-14 RIGHT NOW BROWSING ON DEVIANTART WHEN THERES THIS SHIT ON THE PAGE AND THEIR PARENTS ARE PROBABLY FUCKING BEHIND THEM RIGHT NOW UNLESS YOU ARE A LUCKY SHIT WITH A WALL BEHIND YOU AND THEY SEE THIS SHIT.

YEAH HELL NO THEY SHOULDVE BEEN FUCKING GROUNDED BY NOW

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

NoePlat In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-12 23:15:29 +0000 UTC]

So what. What's the mater to that. I mean does that really have that much of an impact anyway. And if it does, is it really necessary to talk like that ?
Many pieces considered as art exposed around the world shows body parts this way. Sure the way it's exposed is arguable but still... chill.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FRlENDS In reply to NoePlat [2018-02-12 23:23:22 +0000 UTC]

ok w/e

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MegaMaster528 In reply to FRlENDS [2018-02-12 07:04:41 +0000 UTC]

Man its 2018 parents are not controlling their kids that much yeah they should and yes english is not my native language

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

dryuya In reply to MegaMaster528 [2018-02-12 11:54:05 +0000 UTC]

Yes because it's 2018 lets all just full blast kill the innocence of 7 year olds without giving them a chance to grow and develop naturally to discover these things at a more appropriate time...because fuck em right? They're 7 and who the hell is seven now days in 2018...geez.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

matthew-lane In reply to dryuya [2018-02-13 04:10:52 +0000 UTC]

This website is rated 14+, now I'm not great at maths, but 10 times out of 9 I can tell which number is bigger & 7 seems to be smaller than 14, so a 7 year old should not be on a site rated 14+. Now the fact that one may be is not a platform issue, its a failure of parental oversight in to their own children's media consumption issue. It is not dA's job, nor the job of any user on dA to police other peoples children.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MegaMaster528 In reply to matthew-lane [2018-02-15 12:15:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank ya!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>