HOME | DD
8BitLola — More or Less
Published: 2016-04-17 19:13:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 178348; Favourites: 5051; Downloads: 6547
Redirect to original
Description
twitter.com/8BitLola8bitlola.tumblr.com
instagram.com/8BitLola
Related content
Comments: 554
Also......what about going to a shopping mall, and walking by a Victorias Secret, EVERYONE sees more (and less) than what is in this shot.
This is all about Selective Outrage.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
14+ bitches. if a 5 year old is here it is a parental problem not a da problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
It is not art.
ART - the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power.
Where is CREATIVITY in a mere negligee designed for ONLY one purpose which is sexual arousal?
Also, if author wishes to convey emotions, show her face. Because face is the epicenter of emotions, not the body.
By hiding the face, author DEPRIVES viewer of emotions thus rendering such depictions meaningless.
Pity!
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Actually art is a diverse range of human activities in creating visual, auditory or performing artifacts (artworks), expressing the author's imaginative or technical skill, intended to be appreciated for their beauty or emotional power. This demonstrates technical skill so it is in fact Art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm talking about ppreleman BTW
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
i totally agree with you,FUCK THIS SHIT AND PEOPLE THAT SEES THIS!
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
not to mention the lighting. she must have equipment to have set up that lighting. obviously showing skill in a form of art that is photoshooting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Taking attention whore photos isn't!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes it is. if it is a photo it is art
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okay, I'll take a Photo of my cat's pussy and call it art, because according to you any photo is art!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't see why this should have a mature tag. She's clothed. Boobs. Big deal. Beautiful lighting in the image. I love the shadows of the image. Only criticism I have is I would've included her entire face and head into the image.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
this is a wonderful picture of a beautiful girl but other people do not appreciate that it does not have a mature tag. I really don't mind if it does or not but please think of the other people.
Sincerely, KawaiiKiller1232
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
at least you are calm about it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah i don't wanna cause drama
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, thank you and even know i'm 13 i consider other people's feelings.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I did too. Kinda hard to find some one like you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i don't mean to brag but yes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
oh no! boobs! nah but seriously guys, tits aren't that horrifying. i will say though, i bet her photographs are in a LOT of dudes' Favorites. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And also a lot of womens favourites. What you think women don't like tits?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i'm just joking man, hint the lenny face. i personally love tits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No I get it, I was just adding to your statement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Honestly, I see two types of people here and it's exactly why I chose to view this. One set complains, whines like crying little kids, about there not being a mature filter, because they aren't mature enough to avert their eyes from staring at something they "don't" like. The other set of people are the "nice tits, be my woman" set. Now clearly, they are idiots, but damned if they aren't hilarious. Thanks for a good time hahaha
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
There are more than just two types of people.
I check out this photo for the carefully planned composition, the striking colour scheme, as well as the smooth photo manipulation.
There is so much clarity, especially in the hair and lace. I was thinking if I can achieve the same result with the camera that I have. The yellow hue in the hair contrasts with the blue of the background, yet it is so nicely done to draw subtle attention.
Sometimes, a photo can be beautiful in the way it is so wonderfully constructed, rather than what it actually portrays. Although the model and clothes are beautiful, that is just a bonus for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I'm not savvy in photo manipulation so I can't see it. Can you explain where it is? I know how to process a photo to some degree though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am not a photographer but I do use Photoshop and Lightroom a lot.
The first thing that captured my attention was how the sharp outline of the model contrast with the burred background. This kind of blurred look is not something usual that you achieve with just a camera in my experience. The background is blurred so much to achieve this smooth air-brushed look. The hair still has so much details despite the bright light on the right side. Even in the shadowed area on the left, you can almost see each individual strand of hair.
For me personally, I would achieve it bright brightening the shadow, decrease the white values and bring up the clarity level (Of course, you also need great camera quality).
The colours are also very visually balanced and I don't think it is a coincidence. I believe it is careful planing and use of colour adjustment.
It would hard for me to believe that such a beautiful photograph can be achieve with just camera work alone. Everything looks so perfect and I think most professional photographs goes through manipulation to highlight the subject and communicate the intended purpose. I know some people don't call this art but I believe that good photos require skill and effort to produce.
My knowledge is limited but I hope this helps.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I see. Thank you.
Just a couple of points on the photography part of things- the focus of the picture is separate from the contrast, so it's very simple to get the hairs in focus and the background blurred like that, it's just to do with aperture- but you're absolutely right about needing good photography equipment for this level of it. My Canon 60D would do it pretty well, but a Canon 7D would do it better.
The colour balance is probably edited, but it's not photo manipulation, it's image processing. Manipulation would be if she enhanced the size of her breasts in post production, changed the colour of her hair, or replaced the background. Things I have no idea how to do.
This photo probably could be achieved through camera work alone, but only by someone who really knew what they were doing and knew the ins and outs of their camera.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well, yes, clearly there are more than 2 types of people, I was talking about the two i came here to see. The types here, that I knew would be here complaining about the picture, or drooling over it with their dick in hand.
Don't worry, Eggy, I'm not generalizing you in with everyone else, i'm just laughing at them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't think either. I think it's kind of cheapening and low.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Personally i'm more of a why is it here kind of person, but then again Tits, so i don't care that much
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I've accidentally stumbled on things like this when I didn't want to, and I'm sure many children have as well, so I would say I'm a less whiny filter person. But yes... the whinier they are, the more hilarious... and yeah, the pervs are also just great for a laugh XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I mean, you don't just accidentally stumble across this. You literally have to click a link to get to it. Even going through random deviations, that's kind of a risk you take if you do that because you -know- there are images of this type that exist. I'm all for the mature filter being used, but if a kids old enough to be on the internet (cough cough, parents of 3 year olds with ipads, like wtf), you're not stopping him/her from seeing this kind of content regardless, as just about 50% of popups and advertisements are porn related. People are as always, offending themselves.
"Oh noes, this devilry can be seen by kids!" --- "Oh yeah? Was that what you said when you left your door unlocked while you were fucking your spouse like a rabid rabbit on Viagra, and your kid walked in and silently watched what he thought was a wrestling match??"
Every single person who complains about a mature filter not being on something -they- think it should be on, are idiots. If you report it and DA does nothing, it isn't against the rules, so either shut up and move on, or face the musical choir of laughter coming from me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I do agree parents should be monitoring their kids more closely on sights like this, but I still feel this isn't the purpose of the site. And you can actually see things... pretty clearly... when just scrolling through posts. This goes for all kinds of art, including many worse than this. I've seen a lot of truly traumatising things, along with vore, dickpics, completely pornographic material and fetishes, among other things.
I think more or less we agree tbh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Generally, the staff here at DA are on it, if someone reports it to need a mature filter, and it needs it, it either gets one or gets deleted, pretty simple.
Some call this art, some call it boobs, that's not for any one person to decide, and I abhor those that think doing so is their choice, not a privilege of DA.
Yeah, I don't like seeing random nudes every day, but I also have my maturity filter off because there are other mature things I like seeing. This is however is not nude, not really even that bad as far as sexualization goes. And the amount of comments made about if it does or not need a mature filter is staggering. If it needed one, It would have gotten one, period. Read the rules people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev | | Next =>