HOME | DD

Published: 2004-12-03 01:35:51 +0000 UTC; Views: 31529; Favourites: 55; Downloads: 1587
Redirect to original
Description
Okay Folks. Here's the deal. I'm really tired of seeing eight zillion different screen setups being used to post prints because when everyone has thier own wacky standard then *nobody* ends up producing art work the same way. So I'm taking the initiative and implementing a little standardization here.Here's how my chart works: Simply use your monitor adjustments, wherever they are (on the monitor, from software within your computer for your video card, whatever) to change you CRT monitor (aka, NOT FLATSCREEN) so that the following things happen:
1. The middle bars, or Zone Steps, indicate the nine step transition from screen black (not TRUE BLACK) to pure white -1 (NOT SCREEN WHITE). The darkest bar or "I" should appear as black as your screen can go. The lightest bar, or "X" should appear SLIGHTLY LESS WHITE THAN THE SURROUNDING WHITE BACKGROUND. If the two appear completely the same, then there is a problem with your monitor calibation. I've included the means to fix it. Go to step two.
2. The lower left hand box is the black calibration box. You should adjust your monitor so that the gradient within it can be seen but only enough so that it appears to vanish into the surrounding blacks between 1/3 and 1/2 from the left to the middle of the box.
3. The lower right hand box is the white calibration box. You should adjust your monitor so that there is a difference between the two inner boxes and the outer one, but only enough so that they do not blend completely together. The middle box is SCREEN WHITE.
4. Make sure your monitor is set to millions/billions/trillions of colors or else every photo you look at will have a compressed colorspace. To check and see if yours is set to it's highest rez, look at the COLOR grad in the middle of the chart. If the upper one appears to have "banding" or doesn't look like a smooth transition from color to color (I provided an example of color stepping, which looks simiilar to banding), find your monitor's controls and change it to it's highest rez. If your monitor is old and crappy and can't display anything more than thousands of colors, buy a new one, they don't cost much, even a crappy millions+ monitor will be better than one that can't display a full RGB colorspace.
Once you've done this, go bounce around dA again and look at just how much freaking better (or worse) things look... it can be shocking. My goal is to keep people from MAKING poorly compressed work: under exposed or underprinted or flat work...
I'll do a whole explanation on this to anyone who wants to hear it.
(Technical Spec: bw grad at 11% intervals equiv. to 28.33/channel/step. Zone I @ 0 : 0 : 0 , Zone X @ 253 : 253 : 253. color grad at R : Y : G : C : B : M : R @ exactly (R : G : B) R= 255 : 0 : 0 , Y= 255 : 255 : 0 , G= 0 : 255 : 0 , C= 0 : 255 : 255 , B= 0 : 0 : 255 , M= 255 : 0 : 255 , R= 255 : 0 : 0 , ZoneI swatch @ L : a : b or H : S : B %'s 0 : 2 : 4 : 6 : 8 over 0, ZoneX+ swatch @ L : a : b or H : S : B %'s 95 : 97 : 100 with RGB center column grad equiv. to Zone X to Zone X+: 243/channel to 255/channel)
Thanks a bunch for looking and hopefully, using.
Related content
Comments: 76
micdt In reply to ??? [2005-05-17 06:48:54 +0000 UTC]
and did you make a decision? or decide not to decide?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to micdt [2005-05-18 05:03:03 +0000 UTC]
Well, right now I'm testing the waters with this print... I'm still very much a believer in the print system of fine art consumption, so I've done the edition and we'll see how it sells, and how mnay galleries, if any, pick it up. I'll have an answer, no doubt~ but you'll have to give me some time, michael! hehe
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
micdt In reply to Adoniram [2005-05-18 18:09:38 +0000 UTC]
it is always good to have a second option. not always decisions taken under pressure due to economical needs are good decisions i think. i hope many galleries ae going to show your stuff. (BTW: doesn't "stuff" have a pejorative undertone?)
i'll never be in this situation (i hope). i do not consider myself an artist after all.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to micdt [2005-05-19 15:53:16 +0000 UTC]
Art is in the intent and the communication, from creator to observer. Defining oneself as an "artist" or not at all hardly classifies you one way or the other. Don't sell yourself short michael, if you show a bit of your vision to others using skill and finesse, you are as much an artist as anyone else, if not more so than many of the poseurs out there who define themselves through pretentious diatribes rather than emotion and intent~
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
micdt In reply to Adoniram [2005-05-19 18:28:28 +0000 UTC]
Art is in the intent and the communication
hm. yes. true. i like the idea of an artist as a translator, amplifier, explorer, communicator. yes.
maybe it is that i have been conditioned for so many years to observe and document, writing and photographing. but of course it may well be that i add layers to my work, consciously or not, with emotion and intent - which one might call an artistic process.
yet i would always hesitate to answer "yes", if someone asked if i were an artist. maybe to make clear what do not want to be. in order not to become an aim of my own prejudices.
art is a whore
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to micdt [2005-05-20 08:02:28 +0000 UTC]
art is a whore
hehe... that is indeed true.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lonnietaylor [2005-04-17 01:08:47 +0000 UTC]
Faved so that people see this on my page and learn something.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to lonnietaylor [2005-04-17 01:20:14 +0000 UTC]
Sure thing. Good luck~
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Adoniram In reply to geostant [2005-04-10 22:10:16 +0000 UTC]
Never fear... I'm working on an LCD as we speak.... it will take a while so I can figure out the best way to instruct people on how to use it. thanks for the +fav!!
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
briefrespite In reply to ??? [2005-04-06 18:42:25 +0000 UTC]
sorry for being a bit of a retard, but what about flatscreens?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to briefrespite [2005-04-06 18:44:58 +0000 UTC]
Not a dumb question... I haven't made one yet. No one asked. Given that you want one, I'll do just that. Stay in contact with wherever you found this image, or just chekc my page or something.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
briefrespite In reply to Adoniram [2005-04-06 18:49:48 +0000 UTC]
thanks, i'm so computer retarded but once someone shows me something i usually remember it. [i think it comes from having a 60yr old home economics teacher for IT...]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to briefrespite [2005-04-06 19:56:36 +0000 UTC]
Dear gods... that's a horrible way to learn unless it's unusually gifted (technically) 60yr old home ec teacher... hah!
but then again, IT is the spawn of all things evil. I'm pretty sure winblowz 98 congealed in some corporate IT department...
~adoinram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
briefrespite In reply to Adoniram [2005-04-06 19:59:33 +0000 UTC]
lol, my real IT teacher had to retire due to heart problems, [way back in 1995!] and then i spent the next 3years learning to type[unsuccesfully- msn messenger did a better job] and for some reason doing blueprints of the school
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to briefrespite [2005-04-06 21:32:53 +0000 UTC]
Haha... I learned to type the same way, I must admit.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
briefrespite In reply to Adoniram [2005-04-06 22:30:17 +0000 UTC]
it's a great learning tool
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to briefrespite [2005-04-07 01:47:34 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
micdt [2005-04-06 07:14:48 +0000 UTC]
this is very helpful indeed. thanks a lot.
sometimes people complained about photos being "too dark" and i had the suspicion that their moni was dejusted...
i'd like to put the calibration-chart somewhere on my DA-page if you don't mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to micdt [2005-04-06 07:18:12 +0000 UTC]
You're more than welcome to do just that. I think dA having something that resembles means of calibration would go a long way in helping everyone prep thier images. I included the technical spec at the bottom just in case it's needed. Feel free to post it anywhere you wish, so long as you link the image to me, or something like that. Cheers!
I already mentioned that I found your gallery interesting on your main page. You have a very exacting eye, interesting work and a clear vision.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
micdt In reply to Adoniram [2005-04-06 18:21:47 +0000 UTC]
thanks a lot, mate
i included the link to your chart in the journal now and it will stay there. so hopefully many people are going to use it and be much hapier with viewing picture then
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to micdt [2005-04-06 21:40:49 +0000 UTC]
Thanks... since an LCD chart was requested I'll get to work on that ASAP... but LCD's are MUCH more subjective than CRT's... so we'll have to wait and see.
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jaakobou In reply to ??? [2005-03-20 12:30:49 +0000 UTC]
just used it
everything i ever did now looks dark and sad [my screen was too bright]
except for this -> [link] which still makes me laugh out loud ^_^
basically what i did was to drop my brightness from 100 to about 73 ..
cheers man
jaako
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Adoniram In reply to jaakobou [2005-03-20 23:44:07 +0000 UTC]
It's funny how over-bright and under-bright our monitors can make things... someday the entire process will be standardized, maybe...
in truth... i doubt it.
lol
~adoniram
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
<= Prev |