HOME | DD

AlmudenaDoncelArt — What I Understand

Published: 2012-01-10 21:29:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 9613; Favourites: 977; Downloads: 142
Redirect to original
Description

Just how I feel right now. Thank Unicorns that art exist to turn the world into something totally magic and beautiful.
Related content
Comments: 276

fluffkomix In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 21:21:16 +0000 UTC]

NO. SHUT UP. ALL THE PEOPLE WHO AGREE ARE ALL TERRIBLE ARTISTS WHY IS THIS.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hairEbunny [2012-01-11 08:01:43 +0000 UTC]

uh. that is a contradictory statement.
Art is created by people therefore the people creating it want to send out a certain message or beauty to the world. If you don't understand human beings and their emotions you don't understand the background of why the artwork was created. You therefore fail as an artist because if nobody feels and connects with your artwork it won't be popular. Judging by your popularity I'd say you understand a lot of people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

oOLittleLemonOo In reply to hairEbunny [2012-01-11 10:08:01 +0000 UTC]

I totally agree with you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TimeSheep In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 07:26:47 +0000 UTC]

Nobody understands art...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

peacewood In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 07:14:11 +0000 UTC]

eh?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hedgebat001 In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 06:23:55 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure how one can understand art without understanding people. Certainly there are works that require no introduction, no explanation of the artists behind them, but all art is inextricably human; Otherwise, art becomes limited to the most shallow and visceral of things. At that point, why make art? Why look at it, or listen to it, or feel it if you can't take anything emotional or ideological from it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cartoonygothica In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 04:19:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, this statement somewhat fits my state of being.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to cartoonygothica [2012-01-11 21:22:11 +0000 UTC]

but not really because it's a terrible statement

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cartoonygothica In reply to fluffkomix [2012-01-12 01:32:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to cartoonygothica [2012-01-12 03:02:54 +0000 UTC]

B]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Psychoneurotic-Alice In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:56:17 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Wolvencheif In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-14 19:57:55 +0000 UTC]


MOAR ENCOURAGEMENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychoneurotic-Alice In reply to Wolvencheif [2012-01-14 20:24:48 +0000 UTC]

NO EVEN MORE THAN THAT!

lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolvencheif In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-15 00:06:17 +0000 UTC]

ENCOURAGEMENT FROM THE EMPEROR

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fluffkomix In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-11 21:22:26 +0000 UTC]

No it's not stop giving her compliments you're gonna encourage her

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychoneurotic-Alice In reply to fluffkomix [2012-01-11 23:14:04 +0000 UTC]

..... what are you talking about?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-11 23:45:21 +0000 UTC]

stop it. stop it stop it stop it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychoneurotic-Alice In reply to fluffkomix [2012-01-11 23:52:50 +0000 UTC]

give me a good reason to then =_=

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-12 00:18:30 +0000 UTC]

no no no no no

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Psychoneurotic-Alice In reply to fluffkomix [2012-01-12 00:19:27 +0000 UTC]

why, don't have one?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to Psychoneurotic-Alice [2012-01-12 03:03:03 +0000 UTC]

nope nope nope nope nope

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Arg3ntate In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:53:42 +0000 UTC]

Feels like this read my mind xD people, and how to deal with them and understand them, is something I just don't get a lot of the time. Art is so much easier (and much more fun) to understand.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Wolvencheif In reply to Arg3ntate [2012-01-14 19:56:38 +0000 UTC]


ENCOURAGEMENT TO YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Take that haters]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpookyBjorn In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:51:02 +0000 UTC]

LOOL at the arguments below

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Corky-tan In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:47:39 +0000 UTC]

I know what defines a person....but what defines art?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kha7 In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:27:42 +0000 UTC]

And that is exactly why I decided to study Art History at university! xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

iors [2012-01-11 03:18:49 +0000 UTC]

I understand completely!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

devilish-dozer In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:08:04 +0000 UTC]

I think this stamp is a fallacy right off the first read. You can't "understand" art, you can only appreciate it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

Lys-Antigone In reply to devilish-dozer [2012-01-12 18:07:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. Really.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheTealQualia In reply to devilish-dozer [2012-01-11 03:41:12 +0000 UTC]

I think that depends on individual philosophies.
After all, if a person "interprets" meaning, then they do "understand" albeit differently then perhaps it was intended -- but to say that isn't just as worthwhile as the intended idea cannot be proven. An example is this conversation: you think you "understand" this phrase enough to make a comment on it's validity, however your conclusion seems to be very different then the artist who made the statement, and even from mine, a fellow "appreciator." This outlook leads to the questions of, "what is understanding, but experience gained?" and "is it necessary to have the same exact experience (or "understanding") as the artist to connect spiritually to another's ideas?" After all, as people, it is all we can do to relate and try to listen to one another. What it comes down to is that -- at least from an existential view -- people's can only judge based on what they know, and if they feel like they understand, then why does it matter if they don't share the same view as another? It's not very reasonable to undermine a train of thought for no reason.

tl;dr:
Actually it's not a fallacy and what you're saying is an opinion.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

devilish-dozer In reply to TheTealQualia [2012-01-11 03:56:30 +0000 UTC]

What I am saying is simply opinion, and nothing more, it is true. The validity of my statement, however, is philosophical at best and I do agree with some of your statements. This issue at hand is obviously semantic, but the use of the word 'understanding' in context with 'art' would't be my first choice. Particularly in the context of comparing understanding a person to understanding art.

The artist at hand has every right to use that word; it is their 'art'. As I have every right to disagree with and criticise the "art work", particularly when it is in the public realm.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ari-chann In reply to devilish-dozer [2012-01-11 03:24:54 +0000 UTC]

If you're an artist you can understand art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

devilish-dozer In reply to Ari-chann [2012-01-11 03:26:32 +0000 UTC]

If you are an "artist", you can simply appreciate art in different ways. Some art can never be understood except by it's creator. That's the beauty of art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ari-chann In reply to devilish-dozer [2012-01-11 03:32:07 +0000 UTC]

If the meaning is shared then it can be understood, just not on the same level since it came from another person.

Art still can be understood though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

devilish-dozer In reply to Ari-chann [2012-01-11 03:49:44 +0000 UTC]

I'm afraid I'll have to agree to disagree on the semantics. We can never fully share the same perception as the artist, but it is our perception of the art that makes it just that: art.

You can understand how art works, the rule of thirds, balance, ecetera. But I'm not sure I would ever say I have fully "understood" a piece of work. To do so, would to me, seem pretentious at best.

This is, of course, all philosophical. I simply disagree with the statement presented in the stamp.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ari-chann In reply to devilish-dozer [2012-01-11 05:03:00 +0000 UTC]

I agree with what you're saying but all I was trying to point out was that it is possible to understand art. I'm not trying to say everyone can, I'm simply pointing out that I don't think what you're saying is true. Art can be understood. Just because some people can't doesn't mean it's impossible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

l3rotherwolf [2012-01-11 03:06:26 +0000 UTC]

I understand people, but not art.... am I crazy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to l3rotherwolf [2012-01-11 21:24:12 +0000 UTC]

....no that sounds about right

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

l3rotherwolf In reply to fluffkomix [2012-01-12 03:24:29 +0000 UTC]

Hah!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Primmly In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 03:04:24 +0000 UTC]

I don't want to understand people It just makes me sad...

Art on the other hand is fantastic~

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PinkisPractical In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 02:55:16 +0000 UTC]

If you understnad art-you can kinda understand people. It's just easier to interact with something in the mind-like art-than people in every other sense of interaction, social, spiritual, mental, ect.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PinkisPractical In reply to PinkisPractical [2012-01-11 02:55:32 +0000 UTC]

Especially Social, XD.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tepperzart In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 02:45:43 +0000 UTC]

I get this. It's hard to understand others, but seeing something that represents them and their story, so one can interpret it themselves... that's meaningful to me. It's not always easy to converse, and art is something I really love and try to understand, because it can leave room for new perspectives and growth.
I just... really love this stamp.
And it's a very interesting way to say this! ^^ Thanks for the p.o.v.!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Mr-Ripley In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 02:38:36 +0000 UTC]

true

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to Mr-Ripley [2012-01-11 21:25:57 +0000 UTC]

NO. NO. NO. NO. NO.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

otakugal15 In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 02:19:00 +0000 UTC]

Well, aren't YOU just a PRECIOUS little snowflake that understands the WHOLE of the art world.

*gags*

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Kikikah In reply to otakugal15 [2012-01-11 22:06:08 +0000 UTC]

hehe

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fluffkomix In reply to otakugal15 [2012-01-11 21:25:50 +0000 UTC]

I love you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

hgfdsasdfgh In reply to ??? [2012-01-11 01:50:27 +0000 UTC]

Oh my gosh... This describes how I feel perfectly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fluffkomix In reply to hgfdsasdfgh [2012-01-11 21:28:47 +0000 UTC]

Then obviously you should realize how stupid you are

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


<= Prev | | Next =>