HOME | DD

HaxorusMan348 In reply to apeman80 [2013-05-27 23:12:30 +0000 UTC]

What are you talking about? The Simpsons is PART of this evil! Its that one final boss that refuses to die no matter how many Meteors or Omnislashes you throw at it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

apeman80 In reply to HaxorusMan348 [2013-05-29 07:28:56 +0000 UTC]

excuse me, the Simpsons created the animated sitcom with the ideal of making high quality cartoons that would levied the medium from being largely considered child's medium to scope that commentary things like social issues, political, religious, and even the American education system.
Seth MacFarlane has tried to destroy all of that with his cheap, vulgar, poorly written politically incorrect self-serving crap that I cringe whenever see or hear about anew animated sitcom for fear that it might just be piece of crap like family guy.
pray that this is not the end of dream and ere when the Simpsons go's off the air.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sekele In reply to Darkton93 [2012-03-28 20:57:57 +0000 UTC]

to be fair, they did their fair share of bashing on the Liberals as well
no-one is immune to ridicule
just conservatives tend to be more but-hurt about it
(and I'm saying this as a conservative)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sekele In reply to beefcake04 [2012-05-20 14:42:21 +0000 UTC]

Nah, he's ok
American Dad is pretty neat

plus, the Flintstones weren't that good to begin with

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 01:13:47 +0000 UTC]

"Lazy and cheap?" Family Guy is the one to talk.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stevemacqwark In reply to BomKosh [2011-06-30 10:01:18 +0000 UTC]

I mean as in terms of animation beside Flinstones, South Park and all those Seth MacFarlene cartoons are a hell of lot funnier and watchable than the new episodes of the Simpsons which just won't die already!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 10:03:01 +0000 UTC]

Have you ever heard of limited-animation?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stevemacqwark In reply to BomKosh [2011-06-30 10:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Ever heard of ungodly HD Simpsons with Russel Brand, Katy Perry and references to anything new like the iPad?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 10:09:47 +0000 UTC]

What?

Dude, I've only asked you if you have ever heard of limited animation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stevemacqwark In reply to BomKosh [2011-06-30 10:13:13 +0000 UTC]

Of course I did.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 10:15:52 +0000 UTC]

Well then you should be aware that back in the 60s, it was a new trend for Saturday morning cartoons and we get newer technology every year.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Sekele In reply to BomKosh [2012-05-20 14:44:10 +0000 UTC]

that does not excuse them for having lazy writing

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to Sekele [2012-05-20 22:35:50 +0000 UTC]

Way to make a reply on a year old argument.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekele In reply to BomKosh [2012-05-21 04:48:00 +0000 UTC]

better late than never XD

that's the great thing about the internet
you'r comments can stick around for as long as the site exists

It's not like I don't get answers for comments from years ago

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to Sekele [2012-05-21 06:55:12 +0000 UTC]

But reviving an argument that was already settled isn't really an accomplishment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekele In reply to BomKosh [2012-05-21 08:19:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stevemacqwark In reply to BomKosh [2011-06-30 10:23:17 +0000 UTC]

Too bad Matt Groening abused it instead writing something funny.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 10:26:24 +0000 UTC]

I think he's more focused on Futurama than he is with The Simpsons. After all, even Comedy Central's version still had the old-style humor.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stevemacqwark In reply to BomKosh [2011-06-30 10:27:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank God for Futurama!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BomKosh In reply to stevemacqwark [2011-06-30 10:28:45 +0000 UTC]

Even though I rather prefer pre-1960s cartoons over the 80s cartoons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sekele In reply to PD-Black-Dragon [2012-03-28 20:59:41 +0000 UTC]

some childhoods need to be raped

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Mayshha In reply to Sekele [2012-05-19 15:54:00 +0000 UTC]

Dafuq ? oO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekele In reply to Mayshha [2012-05-20 14:40:59 +0000 UTC]

let's be honest here
HB cartoons of that era (especially the 70s) sucked
the lazy writing and cheap animation, designed solely for the purpose of a soulless, mass-produced product

people may like to bitch and moan about cartoons nowadays, but they are at least TRYING to have some sort of individuality to themselves

I em aware of the hypocrisy of Seth McFarlane rippin on the Flinstones, seeing how he's guilty of many of their sins himself (like the re-cycling of concepts and characters), but when he's right about something, than he's right (plus, American Dad is actually a very well written series)

I really hate how people tend to idealize the past, completely forgetting about how it REALLY was!

The 30s-40s and the 90s were the only time periods with truly excellent animation being the standards
Bot the 50s-70s period was the god-damn dark ages as far as animation goes, with the 70s being the worst of them all (as there was actually some creativity in the earlier decades, Johnny Quest for example was ahead of it's time, but during the 70s, the animation studios were relying solely on tired formulas, with cheap mass-production being the only goal)

Even if cartoons today may be a step-down from the 90s standard, they are still a superior product to what we had in the earlier decades.
So yeah, anyone claiming that Jabberjaw is superior to Adventure Time, definitely deserves to have their childhood raped.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtSUPER123 In reply to Sekele [2014-01-09 00:37:11 +0000 UTC]

LOL. I'm not even gonna say anything 'cause that was 2 fucking years ago. everyone has forgotten bout dat

goodbaiii 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Sekele In reply to ArtSUPER123 [2014-01-10 20:50:56 +0000 UTC]

well, the remake wasn't made anyway 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ArtSUPER123 In reply to Sekele [2014-01-11 22:30:58 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0