HOME | DD

catlover β€” Demure

Published: 2005-04-14 06:20:06 +0000 UTC; Views: 1065; Favourites: 32; Downloads: 166
Redirect to original
Description I've just been experimenting with different materials. The next piece I'm submitting should be quite the opposite to this.
Related content
Comments: 44

entropyworld [2006-01-01 21:43:38 +0000 UTC]

You evoke to me the image of cossete, fron Les MisΓ©rables. I don't know why... you just do.

Gourgeous photography, just like you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to entropyworld [2006-01-02 03:37:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

entropyworld In reply to catlover [2006-01-02 03:45:35 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lilrat [2005-11-26 21:46:08 +0000 UTC]

oh cool! i was thinking about getting it done, but the hardest thing will be convencing my parents 9.9;

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to lilrat [2005-11-27 02:32:16 +0000 UTC]

yeah I didn't tell one of mine (my mum) she got angryyyyyyyyyyyy.

but it's all good now, she just doesn't really like the ring.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lilrat [2005-11-26 01:09:46 +0000 UTC]

wow very nice, at what age did you get your nose peirced?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to lilrat [2005-11-26 05:00:39 +0000 UTC]

I was....14

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S-H-M-I-L-Y [2005-08-22 18:49:23 +0000 UTC]

this is so feminine! lovely emphasis on the eyes!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to S-H-M-I-L-Y [2005-08-29 08:03:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ne0pxi [2005-05-21 02:55:55 +0000 UTC]

WOW

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to ne0pxi [2005-05-24 11:25:52 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the WOW!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

themadcellist [2005-04-28 13:39:29 +0000 UTC]

I think you should've had white eyeliner on to create a more pure, softer image. i still love it to bits. But it just would've worked better, i think.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to themadcellist [2005-04-28 14:35:35 +0000 UTC]

That's a great idea, but I don't have any white eyeliner unfortunately.




MSN's not working here *sobs*

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

themadcellist In reply to catlover [2005-04-29 12:32:32 +0000 UTC]

I have all the makeup you can uuuuse!

aaaaaaaawwww. I miss talking you yah! Mine wasn't working, so I used the really shitty version= 4.7 Lol

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to themadcellist [2005-04-29 13:06:39 +0000 UTC]

I don't even REMEMBER that version so it must be pretty shit indeed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sirrena [2005-04-15 01:31:45 +0000 UTC]

So pearly! (best word I could find hehe), I like the softlness of it, and how you're huddled in the white, I love it. :+fav-:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to Sirrena [2005-04-15 05:15:40 +0000 UTC]

Thank you. And I like that you used that word to describe it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

valkyrieshoes [2005-04-14 17:30:15 +0000 UTC]

lovely soft colors

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to valkyrieshoes [2005-04-15 05:15:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

xxslashedxx [2005-04-14 15:07:09 +0000 UTC]

it reminds me of being innocent and calm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to xxslashedxx [2005-04-14 15:15:56 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

everydaygoldfish [2005-04-14 13:29:26 +0000 UTC]

Comparison critique of this and Sullen , makes sense as they're a pair:

Firstly, kickass .

Again, your pictures seem to work better when they're really close in. Not that you shouldn't experiment with distance, but the emotion comes across more undisturbed by backdrops. This is especially evident with the self-portraits, maybe that's slightly unavoidable unless you use the self timer.

I think the paired photo idea is brilliant; it makes the viewer focus on the contrast between the two rather than their individual merits. That can be a disadvantage and/or an advantage, but in my eyes, you've pulled it off. I was considering suggesting that you should've placed them side-by-side in the same image, but now I think that'd probably lessen the effect, as I see them as very seperate entities rather than a comparison.

I may have just contradicted myself there, but I have to go now as it's the end of ICT . Sorry about the short comment love.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to everydaygoldfish [2005-04-14 13:35:12 +0000 UTC]

When I first starting editing them I had actually planned to have them side by side. But I decided they might be better off as individual pieces - but still a sort of...series. Also I really didn't want any background, that's why I had the camera so closeup. I wanted the lace/tulle to be a border for the face and even though it didn't work as perfectly as I had hoped - it still turned out alright.

Thank you so much for your lovely comment

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

everydaygoldfish In reply to catlover [2005-04-14 16:37:30 +0000 UTC]

Sorry I couldn't write more, I did have lots of ideas but the damn timetable cut me short!

Anyway, great stuff.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to everydaygoldfish [2005-04-15 05:12:17 +0000 UTC]

The comment was perfectomundo! Don't you stress, little chicken.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

everydaygoldfish In reply to catlover [2005-04-15 08:10:46 +0000 UTC]

Mmkay.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FenixPharell [2005-04-14 11:26:31 +0000 UTC]

I love the eyes.the skin..teh expresion.the miseterios look and everything.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to FenixPharell [2005-04-14 12:19:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RaiyneAmon [2005-04-14 10:45:39 +0000 UTC]

woah wicked.. so soft.. and mysterious..

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to RaiyneAmon [2005-04-14 10:52:16 +0000 UTC]

Aww thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Isaiah [2005-04-14 07:48:25 +0000 UTC]

very powerful stare you have, its great the way you have framed the face using the lace . really great shot

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to Isaiah [2005-04-14 08:49:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks again!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Isaiah In reply to catlover [2005-04-14 15:42:33 +0000 UTC]

again your welcome hehe

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sycolution [2005-04-14 06:22:04 +0000 UTC]

are all the pictures of you photoshopped? cause you have the creepiest, most beautiful eyes I've ever seen....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to sycolution [2005-04-14 06:32:39 +0000 UTC]

Yeah most of them are...but I don't change my eyes too much. Are they really that creepy lol?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

sycolution In reply to catlover [2005-04-14 08:49:34 +0000 UTC]

well...yeah, it's not often you see someone with such bright, vibrant, icy eyes. I'm not saying it's a bad thing...most definitely not. It's just...creepy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to sycolution [2005-04-14 08:51:31 +0000 UTC]

Wow...it's funny, because I've never really noticed...it's sort of cool that they're creepy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

krunce [2005-04-14 06:21:35 +0000 UTC]

that's goooorgeous - really amazing job. Elegant yet mysterious, a difficult combination to achieve, I believe (I'm a poet! <-- ) with the colour white and the material lace. Gorgey!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to krunce [2005-04-14 06:32:13 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

lalalalexie [2005-04-14 06:21:27 +0000 UTC]

i love the look of your eyes in this, so mysterious

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

catlover In reply to lalalalexie [2005-04-14 06:32:01 +0000 UTC]

Yay! Thanks lalala

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TiiduS [2005-04-14 06:21:04 +0000 UTC]

Very, very nice foto! Good Job!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

TiiduS In reply to TiiduS [2005-04-14 06:49:01 +0000 UTC]

Ohh... and one more:



^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

catlover In reply to TiiduS [2005-04-14 06:31:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0