HOME | DD

Chrishankhah — Biblical Preaching

Published: 2008-12-31 02:04:59 +0000 UTC; Views: 2456; Favourites: 14; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description Forewarning: This message might not be pleasing to every person who calls himself a "Christian."

While many self-professing Christians spend their time following Joel Osteen or Rick Warren or T.D. Jakes, there seems a core group of authentic believers who, bless their heart, still want to hear Christ exalted, sin convicted, and the grace of God praised. Thank God that there are still preachers to preach this. One such preacher is brother Paul Washer, whose ministry was one of a few blessings used by God to keep me from becoming caught up in the lukewarm sects of false Christianity.

Preaching doesn't "take" the place of the word of God. No one "follows" Paul Washer or R.C. Sproul or C.H. Spurgeon or John Calvin, Luther, not the apostle Paul himself in place of Christ, (as we are so often accused.) Rather, we have read their books and letters and have followed their preaching because they teach from the Scriptures. They exegete the text, they focus on the gospel, they preach soley unto the glory of God.

The message they preach is the gospel. It is not about improving your life. It is not about being a moral person. It is not about "having enough faith" to pay your bills and overcome your cancer. It's not about how many spiritual gifts you can collect like baseball cards. Understand: IT IS NOT ABOUT YOU! It was never about you ...

It is this: In the beginning, GOD made the Heavens and the Earth. He made mankind, but man chose himself over His creator and sinned. We became a fallen people, each born into this sinful nature and deserving a fair punishment by being eternally subject to the wrath of God: hell. Yet God effectually redeemed His people when Christ bore our sin on that tree and took God's wrath for us! Being our perfect sacrifice as a sinless man and yet deity, He rose again and ascended to Heaven that He may one day be our judge. We have believed on Him will be justified in His sight, but all who do not believe are still subject to God's wrath. And all of thisworks to the good pleasure of Him who creates and who redeems. Let scripture alone testify: that we saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ, all unto the glory of God!

And yet we are not left barren in the meantime: "You will know them by their fruit," said Christ. Praise God, that He gives freely to His sheep the Holy Spirit. Thank God that despite our sinful habits we may yet be sanctified in Him! Or, as brother Paul Washer has said, "The evidence that you once believed is that you are still believing; the evidence that you once repented is that you are still repenting!" It is not our effort, then, but as the scripture says, "Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure." (Philippians 2:12-13 ESV)

... Oh yeah. About Paul Washer ... Heh.

The photo, by the way, at the 2008 Legacy Conference in Chicago -- the one with Lecrae and Shai Linne and those guys, yeah? Washer spoke for about 15 minutes on the topic of missions and hit home with a personal conviction. God willing, I will be able to teach these core doctrines to women whether around the world or here in America.

Brothers, if you read nothing else, hear this:

We have been fed a terrible, rotten, carnal false truth in America. There is no "sinners prayer" in the Bible. There is no altar call accompanied by dramatic music and feel-good preaching. There is only the gospel -- the conviction of sin and the exaltation of Christ -- and the beautiful fruit that comes of it.

I urge you, hear the Truth preached:

- Ten Indictments - Paul Washer
- The True Gospel - Paul Washer
- Judgment of God & The Great White Throne - Paul Washer

Also ...

- Doctrine of Original Sin - Mark Keilar
- Doctrine of Sanctification - Tom Chantry
- Exegesis of Romans 9 - James White
- (short clip) Prosperity Gospel - John Piper
- (song) Gospel Music - Shai Linne
- (text) Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God - Jonathan Edwards

Also, I know of an exahaustive list of doctrinal preaching by pastor Tom Chantry, exegeted clearly from God's word. I would highly recommend it if there is any biblical concept that you are still fuzzy on:
- Teachings that Define our Church - Tom Chantry
Related content
Comments: 86

Chrishankhah In reply to ??? [2014-04-25 22:31:38 +0000 UTC]

Hahah, you and me both!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

oayno [2012-08-10 03:16:12 +0000 UTC]

thank you for sharing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

oayno [2012-08-10 03:15:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you for sharing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ania-scarred [2010-02-17 02:53:25 +0000 UTC]

beautiful, thank you so much <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to Ania-scarred [2010-02-17 03:29:47 +0000 UTC]

yes, and thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlaineKatsura [2009-12-01 05:58:41 +0000 UTC]

Amen! Jesus Christ doesn't owe anyone anything. We owe Him everything.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cxmb [2009-09-03 17:50:41 +0000 UTC]

many Christians just don't understand this, God is always first, His will in our lives... yes, as you say many can get really confronted by this!... idk who Paul Washer is

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to cxmb [2009-09-11 09:24:33 +0000 UTC]

lol. That's fine -- but if you are curious, you can check out some of the links. I don't know how much you'll actually learn about "him" but you will surely hear of our great God!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cxmb In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-09-12 12:42:17 +0000 UTC]

lol ok,

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Cealcrest [2009-08-21 04:57:11 +0000 UTC]

I already commented at =christians but wanted to here as well to show support both for Paul Washer and your stand to submit this photo and explanation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to Cealcrest [2009-08-24 06:53:03 +0000 UTC]

Hey, thanks!

How is that deviation doing over there? Has it seemed to stir any controversy, any opportunity for edifying and instructive discussion? I can't seem to dig it up amidst the others. I can only imagine, though, that not everyone will be pleased with it considering some of the rather wishy-washy things I've seen posted there and around dA in the past. I only hope people here will begin to understand that much of what is plastered up and called "Christianity" is far from what the cross is all about.

God bless you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AmericanaRosa [2009-07-16 01:56:29 +0000 UTC]

My hubby and I love hearing the truth preached by Paul Washer. I do agree with Mangoe though, be careful who you condemn. I totally agree about Osteen. I was surprised to see his material displayed in the Christian section of various bookstores. But as Paul Washer said in one of his sermons, not everyone who calls themselves a Christian will go to heaven. Why do you list T.D. Jakes with Osteen?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PatternPop [2009-06-12 02:10:28 +0000 UTC]

Paul has helped me so much...

Fav!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

eikonik [2009-04-14 15:27:09 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much for posting this... Paul Washer is an incredible herald of the Biblical Gospel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to eikonik [2009-04-14 21:26:08 +0000 UTC]

I've been incredibly blessed by his teaching and some similar preachers. Few men calling themselves preachers, these days, seem to have the courage to preach the full and true gospel. The law condemns, grace forgives, God saves, and He finishes what He starts -- inside and out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Thakidmeen [2009-02-24 15:15:35 +0000 UTC]

I really like Paul washer, him and Piper also

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

johnnywhoa [2009-02-02 18:06:47 +0000 UTC]

People keep on asking me if I'm related to this R.C. Sproul fellow.

I gotta wonder if I am....

Maybe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to johnnywhoa [2009-02-03 19:38:46 +0000 UTC]

That's pretty funny. Why do they ask you this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

johnnywhoa In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-04 01:38:20 +0000 UTC]

Same last name.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SparrowsFlame [2009-01-21 05:39:38 +0000 UTC]

You are very correct.

However, I love Joel Osteen. I used to be worried when I would watch him on TV and it was all happy and motivational. Then I got my mom and I tickets to see him when he came to our town. I was very happy to hear more to his preaching in person. Of course it would be wonderful to hear that on his broadcasts too, but at least he does it in person so people are hearing it.

Like I said, you do have a point. The Gospel needs to be told completely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to SparrowsFlame [2009-02-04 05:18:39 +0000 UTC]

What would you say of his preaching in person ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SparrowsFlame In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-08 03:55:07 +0000 UTC]

It was great! He did share more of the whole Gospel as far as the going to Hell part if you don't get saved. So there was more meat to it than on his TV sermons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

pepperbunbun [2009-01-14 20:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Everything you said is true. It makes you take a step back and see what you're really living for; God or yourself. Thank you for sharing!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to pepperbunbun [2009-01-19 22:19:43 +0000 UTC]

A true hinging point for the gospel. Sadly, many are now preaching a man-centered message which they export as Christ's gospel.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pepperbunbun In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-01-20 01:27:36 +0000 UTC]

It's true, but as long as Christians who know the real Gospel keep preaching it (like you have with this deviation), God's light will continue to shine through. Amen!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to pepperbunbun [2009-01-20 01:44:52 +0000 UTC]

Or perhaps it goes this way -- As long as God is shining His light, true Christians will continue to preach the real gospel.

The sovereignty and majesty and power of our God is a beautiful thing !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pepperbunbun In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-01-20 04:21:38 +0000 UTC]

Yes, I agree!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ServantofJesus [2009-01-14 19:56:30 +0000 UTC]

"Preaching doesn't "take" the place of the word of God. No one "follows" Paul Washer or R.C. Sproul or C.H. Spurgeon or John Calvin, Luther, not the apostle Paul himself in place of Christ, (as we are so often accused.)"

I'd recommend adding William Booth to the list there, as the Salvation Army looks up to him as their foundation, and not Christ (even though the *claim* Jesus is, they seem to do it via Booth).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to ServantofJesus [2009-01-16 21:14:08 +0000 UTC]

Don't misunderstand -- these preachers I'm mentioning, they are good because they preach the word of God and not their own message. The folk who look up to them generally revere Christ as their foundation.

I don't know what William Booth teaches and haven't really researched him.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ServantofJesus In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-01-23 18:32:19 +0000 UTC]

Aaaah, I see what you mean now, sorry

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bobojoe84 [2009-01-14 00:35:40 +0000 UTC]

..........

AMEN

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TruthfulLife [2009-01-14 00:14:26 +0000 UTC]

yeah....


so what do you make of Greg Boyd?


before you throw your shoes at me... just tell me your thoughts on his preaching... it sounds sound and in perspective

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-01-16 21:14:35 +0000 UTC]

I haven't heard him to be quite honest. Any examples of his preaching ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-01-17 00:07:52 +0000 UTC]

not honest?

well its mostly related topics of Open Theism, How to be the Kingdom, and the Love of Christ

of course, there is some things most Christians wont accept from this man, but at least he makes a lot of sense

in contrast.... Paul Washer is very simple and upfront... Greg goes indepth to his sermons

if you must, check them out youself...
[link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-01-19 22:21:25 +0000 UTC]

"not honest?" <-- Not sure what you're asking. I casually used the expression "to be honest."

I have not read anything by Greg, but I am familliar with open thiesm. I suppose my question to you is this -- what do you believe about the aspects of God? The Bible speaks of His omnipotence, His omniscience, His omnipresence -- His sovereignty. What do you think of these things?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-01-20 03:09:02 +0000 UTC]

open theism doesnt really challenge the nature of God, it just states the nature of a future filled with possibilities....


God can deal with whatever can happen i guess

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-03 20:45:40 +0000 UTC]

Alright, then -- Can God know the future?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-04 03:42:38 +0000 UTC]

yes, but the future can change.... thus God knows INFINITELY what the future may hold

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-04 03:59:09 +0000 UTC]

Ok. If the future can change, does God know which change will occur before it happens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-04 04:01:05 +0000 UTC]

resourcefulness.... resourcefulness

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-04 04:02:57 +0000 UTC]

Hm. Sorry?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-04 04:25:06 +0000 UTC]

just ever preparing for worst case scenarios


Moses kinda rejected God's intentioned plan to be used first to speak to Pharaoh.... yet God used Aaron to speak His will ...

and didnt Moses intervened and pleaded with God to spare the Jews?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-04 05:17:38 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but I full well believe that God understood these things would happen. A loving parent tells a child not to do dangerous things, but they know their children will. Indeed God is not the cause of our sin, but He does allow things which He know we will do. Even still in His justice He makes known what is true to His character and righteousness.

I do not think that the interaction between man and God is quite that between man and man. Man can 'surprise' another if you will -- ask or plea for something unforeseen and change circumstances. But with God, all things are known. If there is something unknown to Him, He is simply not God. How else could we trust the prophesy which we have in scripture?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-04 18:49:07 +0000 UTC]

true true I don't disagree that God gave us free will even if we are to hurt ourselves and God knew the POSSIBLE outcomes of giving us free will. God really cant be surprissed, yet at the same time God has the capability to feel emotions such as regret (Read the Ark Story)that come out as a result of not a mistake, rather an undesirable outcome even if God anticipated such a tragic result

Prophecy is really understood differently from the dominant Greek view from the Hebrew view... for instance the Greeks viewed prophecy as a preview of a future set in stone that the gods planned for humanity, for better or worse... as for the Hebraic people it was an announcement of God's Will that He has set up to accomplish which unfortunatelly, which was proven in the garden of Eden, was lost due to human error (sin)

you see what im saying? any questions just feel free to ask

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-04 19:34:26 +0000 UTC]

Even as it comes to free will -- I don't believe that man is autonomously 'free' in that. Remember the Fall? Scripture says that man's best deeds are like 'filthy rags' -- (that literally translates to used feminine pads -- gross, right?) It says that there is none righteous -- no, not one. No one seeks after God. We all like sheep have gone astray, every one has turned to his own way.

God gave Adam and Eve free will to choose to obey God and avoid the fruit, or disobey Him and eat it. I fully believe God knew what would happen (but still created Adam and Eve because His love for His creation exceeded His hatred for sin.)

When Adam and Eve fell, ALL of mankind became, as the scriptures say, dead in sin. Free will? Yes. But the only thing our will would ever choose became sin. Man became incapable of choosing God because, as a descendant of Adam we are given into the flesh. We became a fallen race in need of salvation and a God to intervene on our sinful depravity.

Our will was never autonomous that God is not somehow not completely sure what our next step will be. Indeed this would be a logical outcome if Free Will limited the very definition of sovereignty, but it does not. God knows precisely what I will decide before I choose it. Scripture says He knew us while we were in our mother's womb.

The description you've given me contrasting man's will with God's knowledge is found nowhere in scripture -- only an absolute emphasis that God knows all things. Our views are not subject on the Hebraic or Greek understanding of prophesy but on what is written in the scriptures to both cultures. In places in the OT, sure there are conditional covenants -- "If you repent of your sins then I will not judge you" -- but do not think for a moment that God did not know whether or not the people would repent. I tell you this -- without the help of God man cannot repent. God knows precisely who will turn to Him because God draws them.

"No one can come to me unless my father draw him," said Christ. I would note that the word for "draw" in the passage I am quoting translates "drag" in the Greek. So we have not simply erred in sin -- we are dead in it and we must be spiritually born again before we can ever believe in the Savior who redeems His people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-05 03:45:26 +0000 UTC]

let me get back to you on that.....

but i have questions though... does this mean that God chooses those who are to be saved before creation and those who dont?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-05 04:02:51 +0000 UTC]

In a sense -- God chooses who will be saved; the rest He leaves to their sin, which is consequencially the very thing that subjects them to His wrath.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-05 21:32:32 +0000 UTC]

but then why does it say that Christ came to earth because he "so loved the world that He sent his one and only Son"?

doesnt this imply that Christ came for all of the Earth, not only for the elect?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Chrishankhah In reply to TruthfulLife [2009-02-06 05:56:41 +0000 UTC]

Be careful with this verse -- there are several others in the Bible to clarify what this one puts quite vaguely. It says God loved the world, that He gave His son whoever should believe will have eternal life. But it does not say that He gave His son for all men everywhere. In fact, scripture uses the word "world" several times without meaning all men / everywhere.

The context is important. Remember the issue at the time -- Jews believed that a savior was coming for them and them alone, not the gentiles. But the scripture is clear that this is not the case -- Christ came not only for Jew but also for Gentile; indeed believers of Israel were not just God's beloved but those of the world.

This is clarified throughout the epistles.

If Christ's blood effectually atoned for every man and woman to have ever lived in the entire world -- why is God's wrath still on them? The blood IS the atonement is it not? Is it applied to the world -- or only the believing in the world?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TruthfulLife In reply to Chrishankhah [2009-02-06 20:26:23 +0000 UTC]

Well but then why would God make people who are unbelievers in the first place? there really would not be any free will whatsoever

i understand of your clarification of the word WORLD yet at the same time

but i never said the blood atoned for everyone who lived just by existing after the crucifixion, i just said that the blood is now available to anybody who asks, Jew or Gentile, instead of the exclusive Letivical system that depended on the Law and its conditions

yes the world is under wrath, yet God wants all to be saved, so even if God knows how people will be saved, God also knows what happens if the ALTERNATIVE happens instead....

^^
i got laughs just seeing how this debate keeps on going and going

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>