HOME | DD

Published: 2014-08-12 17:24:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 3029; Favourites: 52; Downloads: 10
Redirect to original
Description
Design sold.Finally finished this guys ref sheeeeeeet :'D
Name: Patronum
Gender: Male
Species: Stardog (Starbucks dog species made by superdoq
S/O: Straight
Height: 6'2''
Body type: Lightly muscled
Personality: Major surfer guy. He loves o hang out on the beach and chill with his bros. He loves the ocean and is very VERY laid back. Not much bothers him except for the few things he doesn't prefer in life. Although he is a surfer/beach bum, he does not fit the ....stereotype. He is very smart and loves biology. One day he hopes to be a marine biologist or marine environmentalist.
likes: Harry Potter, THe ocean, Dusk, Biology, Onion rigs, Beach houses, Surfing, Snowboarding, Chilling out, looking at marine life
Dislikes: Storms, wool, high altitudes, ketchup, the word "Soggy"
BOOP.
Related content
Comments: 161
puglings In reply to ??? [2014-08-16 13:28:04 +0000 UTC]
You are disgusting, you little scumbag.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ArtyHylian In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 23:55:08 +0000 UTC]
This is horrible. You are scamming this poor girl who did nothing but make one of your star dogs stand up while wearing clothes, F.Y.I., dogs stand up on their hind legs in real life so, yeah.
This is why people your age shouldn't be able to sell things like this, because your not mature enough to understand how this system works, then you become a scammer and are hated by many, like what's happening now. If you had let this girl just draw anthro the way she wanted and not changed the rules AFTER she bought it (which by the way is not fair or legal) none of this would have happened.
You are also being very rude to her and many other people, I would recommend you man up and apologize to her, or anyone else you may of offended. If you have any bone of common decency that is. Or just any shred of acting like a mature individual.
By the way, selling your Stardogs in general is also illegal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mundees In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 23:22:50 +0000 UTC]
Get off your high horse you disgusting trout.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shikariis In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 20:59:17 +0000 UTC]
I politely ask you to not be an asshole! lol!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
breadstiix In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 20:47:32 +0000 UTC]
Lol no.
Anthro is a STYLE.
You can't force someone to change their STYLE.
Regardless of not liking the style, deal with it. It's a style of something and you can't change that. :^)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mattlancer In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 20:03:00 +0000 UTC]
Dude! She spent many hours on this!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
padIock In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 19:38:03 +0000 UTC]
ur disgusting why was i watching u in the first place ugh
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SunflowerYuki In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 15:38:41 +0000 UTC]
Sir, you are indeed a jerk. SHE is the artist. SHE can draw whatever the heck she wants. If you didn`t want anthros, then you should have put it in the rules, simple as that. No ifs, ands or buts because that`s a really HORRIBLE excuse to pull. Either give a full refund to the artist who have adopted your species, or please stop complaining about the anthros because like i stated before you did not have the no anthros rule up before you began to bug her about it therefore it was your own fault this happened. Also, once that character left your possession it was hers to do with as she pleased while following the rules that were stated WHEN she adopted it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Griwi In reply to ??? [2014-08-15 11:50:35 +0000 UTC]
lol in her case I wouldn't stop drawing it unless you gave them their money back. srsly what kind of a person are you even?
I mean okay in case she would've done something bad or whatsoever which would make you take the designs back you STILL would have to give her the money back because heck that's not a little amount she paid.
for a copyrighted species that's based on something copyrighted.
lol.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
coffaefox In reply to ??? [2014-08-14 23:36:27 +0000 UTC]
I will not take this down. I spend many hours on it. Instead I will just not commission feral art. I am not doing harm by keeping this up for the feral portion of it. please let me do this as I like the reference sheet as it is and I will not be using the anthro portion.
thank you
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
struttons In reply to coffaefox [2014-08-15 07:29:47 +0000 UTC]
if you truely will not use the anthro form, you will take it down. you have 24 hours before your Stardogs are reclaimed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 5
rhuskii In reply to struttons [2014-08-18 05:24:19 +0000 UTC]
says the stupid shit who is trying to copyright shit from STARBUCKS in the first place.
take your shitdogs and your shit attitude somewhere else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LordReuben In reply to struttons [2014-08-17 05:56:40 +0000 UTC]
You shouldn't even claim Stardogs as yours since they are dogs based on a trademarked and copyrighted product.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
requiemdaemonis In reply to struttons [2014-08-15 07:42:15 +0000 UTC]
You do realize this is literally the equivalent of buying a used car from someone and painting it a different colour, only for the person to say "you actually can't paint it that colour, if you don't change it I'm taking it back"
when she purchased the stardog, there was a contract created, and you do not have the authority to alter the contact after the fact. You'll have to live with your mistake. you are at fault. you have no argument.
also stop being a cunt.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
struttons In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 09:03:11 +0000 UTC]
Woah there do not use the word cunt. that is very rude.
second, it was outlines in my rules before purchasing and she knows that.
you need to stay out of someone else's business!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requiemdaemonis In reply to struttons [2014-08-15 09:09:43 +0000 UTC]
this is my business buddy. And no, "I will change the contact after its agreed upon." was not in the description.
when you decided to be such a shrew about all this, you got me involved.
jesus you're worse than the phone companies.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
struttons In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 09:14:21 +0000 UTC]
you are now being blocked.
in the future do not invade on business that is not yours that you have no education to even back up your argument and do not name call or blatantly mis gender someone.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
OldDallas In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 08:53:16 +0000 UTC]
Actually in the description, he has it said that you cannot alter it at all after buying unless given permission. When purchasing the stardog, thats a contact agreement. with the copyright laws, Elliot has every right to tell her she doesn't have the right to do that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 4
rhuskii In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-18 05:27:34 +0000 UTC]
copyright laws my ass,
ripping off Starbucks in the first place
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
mundees In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 23:26:34 +0000 UTC]
Wow is your head really so far up your boyfriends ass that you can't tell the moral differences between right and wrong??
Your boyfriend is a scam artist. Lmao.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to mundees [2014-08-15 23:32:31 +0000 UTC]
Elliot is not my boyfriend, please get your facts straight.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
coffaefox In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 09:05:41 +0000 UTC]
uh, just alittle thing here.
Making an anthro version isn't alterating it. I realize that when I buy an adopt, I generally can't alter the design, and I do respect that but in making an anthro form, I'm essentially just taking the same character and making it stand on two legs.. That's it. No alteration whatsoever.
As far as having the 'right', about 98% of the deviantart, furaffinity, weasyl etc.. culture will make an anthro and feral form for any characters they receive, or purchase.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to coffaefox [2014-08-15 09:07:56 +0000 UTC]
Just read the rules, its in there. along with the fact that he can change it whenever he wants to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
requiemdaemonis In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 09:03:41 +0000 UTC]
making an anthro isn't an alteration, it's an adaptation/addition, an alteration is changing the design. the design hasn't changed. regardless of what your girlfriend thinks.
The point is, you can't add rules after the fact. you cannot change the contract. that's what your girl is doing. changing the contract.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 09:07:23 +0000 UTC]
...did you just misgender my best friend and referred to him as my girl/girlfriend.
Thats extraordinarily rude, dude.
Please, read up on copyright laws.
Please, read the rules of the design, it even says hes allowed to change the rules if he pleases
stop being a cunt, please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
EPlTAPH In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 09:47:13 +0000 UTC]
"Read up on copyright laws"
The species is based on a copyright product, and being sold for profit.
Lol.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to EPlTAPH [2014-08-15 09:48:56 +0000 UTC]
It actually is based off coffee drinks
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EPlTAPH In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 09:59:13 +0000 UTC]
Starbucks is a trademarked entity, and you are profiting from the use of it. Your species sheet denotes this is a species based on Starbucks coffee, specifically.
Starbucks has pursued legal action against two locations using names "parodying" their own, one of them being called Starbarks, which is hilariously relevant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to EPlTAPH [2014-08-15 10:02:28 +0000 UTC]
did you notice the dogs have star eyes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EPlTAPH In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 10:04:26 +0000 UTC]
How about you produce copyright papers, hm? There've been plenty of cases in history where someone drew a dog with a star in its eye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to EPlTAPH [2014-08-15 10:06:40 +0000 UTC]
are you here to argue or....what.. because... im not in the mood to be honest.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
mundees In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 23:30:07 +0000 UTC]
McDonalds can't sell a whopper because its trademarked by Burger King.
Wendy's can't sell a Frappichino because its trademarked by Starbucks.
Don't you dare tell someone to read up on copyright laws, why don't you tell your boyfriend that before he gets his underaged ass taken to court lmao.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to mundees [2014-08-15 23:32:10 +0000 UTC]
WHY DOES EVERYONE THINK HES MY BOYFRIEND. // HES NOT //
he took the starbucks shit out of his species, now they're just drink dogs. They're called Stardogs now because of the eyes.
and trademark and copyright are two different things ok
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
knifepointe In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-16 23:01:59 +0000 UTC]
they even use the same size names as starbucks drinks are you an idiot wow
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mundees In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 23:49:39 +0000 UTC]
Fantastic. Doesn't matter.
Maybe if you didn't shove your head so far up his ass you have to speak for him people wouldn't think you're dating.
$20 or not, you're still ripping someone's money out from under them, its still wrong, its still disgusting, you you shouldn't get away with it.
Thanks for replying for your cowardly boyfriend<\i> though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
OldDallas In reply to mundees [2014-08-15 23:50:39 +0000 UTC]
...you're the one who replied to me in the first place mundees.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EPlTAPH In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 10:08:40 +0000 UTC]
Lol, I'm not arguing. The fact that selling StarDogs violates Starbucks' trademark is a fact.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requiemdaemonis In reply to OldDallas [2014-08-15 09:28:28 +0000 UTC]
send this to your girlfriend because she blocked me:
im crying. no pls. i've been blocked and insulted. on DEVIANTART. i honestly feel so attacked right now. you should be ashamed ma'am.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
1940s In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 09:52:01 +0000 UTC]
Stop fucking misgendering you piece of shit.
Superdoq is a MALE.
Not a FEMALE.
Get it right shit steak
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requiemdaemonis In reply to 1940s [2014-08-15 10:29:19 +0000 UTC]
sorry abut your feelings ma'am
i'm sure i'll feel bad about it later. at some point. maybe.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1940s In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-15 10:43:00 +0000 UTC]
Wow.
So why did you call me "Ma'am"?
Transphobic fuck.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
requiemdaemonis In reply to 1940s [2014-08-15 10:44:22 +0000 UTC]
because i know it upsets you. we are at a disagreement and are exchanging verbal fisticuffs. my goal is to upset you my dear lady <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 5
pastel-dogs In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-19 14:15:22 +0000 UTC]
that's v rude to misgender someone on purpose
if it was on accident it would b forgiven but on purpose??? n o t h a n k s
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LordReuben In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-17 05:54:02 +0000 UTC]
Dude, misgendering people won't help your case. You're disgusting
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
knifepointe In reply to requiemdaemonis [2014-08-16 23:03:20 +0000 UTC]
dude no, there's never an excuse to misgender. it's not just about "upsetting" it's about triggering dysphoria and that's just not cool and never acceptable. :\ your argument was legit but you're just making yourself look bad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>