HOME | DD

daYavuz β€” Internal Structure

Published: 2009-04-10 10:10:04 +0000 UTC; Views: 903; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description One of the walls of Hagia Sophia Museum. They have some organic structure, like senew and muscles.

Ayasofya'nin duvarlardan biri. Sanki organik bir sey, kiris ve kas gibi.
Related content
Comments: 19

albatross-and-ivy [2009-08-25 05:35:10 +0000 UTC]

amazing. always have wanted to go, this is a different view, i really enjoy it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to albatross-and-ivy [2009-10-05 12:22:08 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chuppiee [2009-04-13 17:01:39 +0000 UTC]

Wow that's cool O_O
Photos and other stuff which is simple goes on me ... ^^

Awesome find

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to Chuppiee [2009-04-13 17:36:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fiyonk14 [2009-04-11 00:36:04 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to fiyonk14 [2009-04-11 00:52:34 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TMRE [2009-04-10 21:21:01 +0000 UTC]

Those Romans...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to TMRE [2009-04-10 21:27:29 +0000 UTC]

I think they were more Byzantines than Romans by the time this was built. Ofc, they still called themselves Romans when it came to territorial claims.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

TMRE In reply to daYavuz [2009-04-10 21:34:00 +0000 UTC]

Ah ahah!!! Yes, but Haghia Sophia was built by Justinian? (no Wikipedia here, I am just trying to remember). It was built on the model of the Roman basilicas, I think this round arches are Roman after all.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to TMRE [2009-04-10 22:10:12 +0000 UTC]

Justinian is correct. The brick-and-mortar internal construction and round arches are very Roman indeed. I am guessing that this section might have been covered with dressed masonry originally. Or at least with plaster.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

kopita [2009-04-10 15:05:35 +0000 UTC]

ilginc bir detaymis gercekten...
duvarin diger tarafindaki destekleyici kemerlermi yoksa bize karsi olan bolumdeki yikilmis bi yapinin duvardaki kalintilarimi cozemedim : )ama nefis bir doku..ve her zamanki gibi guzel bir kompozisonla tabiki : )

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to kopita [2009-04-10 15:15:34 +0000 UTC]

Bu Ayasofya'nin dayanaklarindan biri galiba (%100 net hatirlamiyorum). Tepedeki kubbenin agirligi sadece direk asagiya degil, yanlara dogru da baski yapiyor. Bu guclerin bir kismi (Mimar Sinan'in camilerinde oldugu gibi) yarim kubbelerle dengeleniyor ve asagiya iletiliyor. Diger bir kismi da, binanin normal duvarlarina dik yapilmis dayanak duvarlarla karsilaniyor. Bu onlardan biri galiba. Ic yapisindaki kemerler, yapiyi guclendirmek icin olabilir, veya belki ilk olarak kemerli olarak yapilmis (Ingilizcesi 'flying buttress', gotik katedrallerde kullanilmis), sonra bir nedenle kemerler doldurulmus.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

kopita In reply to daYavuz [2009-04-12 11:51:59 +0000 UTC]

bu bahsettigin yanlara dogru yapilan baskΔ± sonucu deprem etkisini cok buyuk bir oranda gecistirmis oluyor .. yapΔ±nΔ±n zemin ile birlikte hareket etmeside boylece bir nebze engelleniyor..gercekten etkileyici bir mimari.
en cok dikkatimi cekende o ΓΌΓ§ kemerin ΓΌstΓΌste gelmesi... vardΔ±r bi nedeni onunda

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

awjay [2009-04-10 12:48:21 +0000 UTC]

super find

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to awjay [2009-04-10 15:16:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

aobaob [2009-04-10 10:23:20 +0000 UTC]

Well seen my good sir!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to aobaob [2009-04-10 10:27:05 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

sealsoul90 [2009-04-10 10:14:21 +0000 UTC]

I like it
I saw the wonderfull Hagia Sofia but can't remember to have noticed this

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

daYavuz In reply to sealsoul90 [2009-04-10 10:28:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, it is a big building. This is quite near the entrance.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0