HOME | DD

DeeVeeCee — The AK-12 Prototypes by

#ak #assaultrifle #assaultrifles #firearm #firearms #gun #guns #izhmash #kalash #kalashnikov #rifle #rifles #russia #russian #weapon #weapons #ak12
Published: 2015-11-04 22:08:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 25677; Favourites: 166; Downloads: 158
Redirect to original
Description The AK-12 project is coming to its unevitable and predictable end. While the game developers and gun enthusiasts were modelling the first prototype of the AK-12, the Kalashnikov Concern (formerly IzhMash) made another one, and then another one, and then ANOTHER one.

The earliest 2013 prototype had the hilarious "ПОЗА" safety/selector ("pose" in Russian) and plenty of sloppy photoshopped variants for different calibers and barrel lengths. The selector and ugly pistol grip were later improved. This is THE variant everyone knows, since this model managed to appear in numerous videogames, such as Call of Duty: Ghosts and Advanced Warfare, Battlefield 4, Killing Floor 2, etc. It also has a butt-ugly airsoft version.

In 2014, another model showed up, this time in at least two calibers for real. It had the LEAST intuitive fire mode selector I've ever seen. It was also the first variant to feature an enlarged magazine release and two-round burst mode.

In 2015, the horrible selector was thankfully fixed, the gas block/barrel/front sight assembly was redesigned, but mostly it remained unchanged. This model even made it to airsoft versions produced in Russia!

Finally, the genius engineers at the Kalashnikov Concern decided that nobody wants a reversible charging handle, or ejection port for that matter. The same decision was made for the ambidextrous safety/selector. Oh, even the enlarged mag release was omitted. But wait, what am I even talking about? They simply SCRAPPED whatever AK-12 advances they made, and presented a classic AK with tacticool furniture and two-round burst mode thrown in, after they won the contest they made up themselves anyway. Hey, this model is actually featured in Payday 2!

I just hope that common sense prevails and they don't actually put it into mass production. The regular army does not really need Picatinny rails, since they can't customize their rifles anyway. Whatever the Russian government and their friends spend our ever-increasing taxes on, this is definitely not something we need.

Update 2018-04-12: minor detail and coloration improvements, new proprietary magazine for the 2013 proto, the 2016 proto's front is more detailed than it deserves to be.
Related content
Comments: 38

DaltTT [2021-03-24 22:43:48 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kray21728SP [2020-09-08 02:56:14 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GaryMahmud [2020-07-14 13:13:41 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kray21728SP [2020-04-24 22:37:21 +0000 UTC]

They can put sight rails since the army need to put their sights.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ayayay-500 [2019-05-22 12:55:35 +0000 UTC]

The Russian Armed Forces has decided to mass-produce the tacticool Galil wannabes and some of them has been seen in the Victory Day Parade this month... so sad.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

someone1fy [2019-04-22 06:35:52 +0000 UTC]

Why didn't your army decide to accept AK-107?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to someone1fy [2019-04-26 06:25:23 +0000 UTC]

Because they need to waste more budget, but cut costs anyway so that more of it comes into their pockets.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

someone1fy In reply to DeeVeeCee [2019-04-26 06:56:07 +0000 UTC]

Oh, hell. I thought it is better than AK-12.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to someone1fy [2019-04-26 18:44:17 +0000 UTC]

It is, to them. Cheaper and easier to produce, considering most of its parts are completely normal AK-74 parts.


But it lost almost every ergonomic advance made in AK-12 prototypes. No ambidexterity, no thumb operated selector, no BOLT CATCH.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

ayayay-500 In reply to DeeVeeCee [2019-04-30 03:29:25 +0000 UTC]

If they ever hope to overmatch the AR-15, they at least seriously need an AK-400M with the ergonomic advances you mentioned...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

someone1fy In reply to DeeVeeCee [2019-04-27 01:49:27 +0000 UTC]

Wow, that's a shame.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Locke20041 [2018-11-09 15:57:27 +0000 UTC]

What the fuck is wrong with those fools?

The regular AK's just fine, but...really? Not even the 2013 prototype???

Bunch of bleeding idiots.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayayay-500 In reply to Locke20041 [2019-05-15 15:36:42 +0000 UTC]

2016 AK-12/15 is essentially a downgraded Ubisoft game.


Proto AK-12 = Ubisoft's Gameplay Trailer

Final AK-12 = Ubisoft's Final Product

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ayayay-500 [2018-08-26 04:04:09 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad i'm not the only one salty about the current AK. The new one's just depressing to look at. It's just like a Russian Galil to me.

But the Russians already have adopted this, sadly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to ayayay-500 [2018-08-27 07:44:32 +0000 UTC]

I'll believe it when I see it.


It's worse than a Galil ACE in a number of ways. It doesn't have the enlarged mag release while the prototypes had one (even the ORIGINAL 70s Galil had one!), it doesn't have the thumb-operated safety/selector while the prototypes had one (even the ORIGINAL 70s Galil had one!), and there is no rail cover for the lower rail while ACE has three for all sides. And, of course, there is no reversible charging handle and/or ejection port, and no bolt catch. Future has really come to Russia, wow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayayay-500 In reply to DeeVeeCee [2019-03-15 22:13:31 +0000 UTC]

At this point, i'd rather name them "AK-404/405" since they're just basically AK-104/105 with a longer barrel, relocated rear sights, and rails slapped onto them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to ayayay-500 [2019-04-10 14:51:21 +0000 UTC]

You're right, the older prototypes (that looked like the 400 save a couple of differences) were called in a similar pattern, e.g. the shortbarreled AK-205 or 7.62x39 AK-203.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayayay-500 In reply to DeeVeeCee [2019-04-23 11:08:52 +0000 UTC]

Hidden by Commenter

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ayayay-500 In reply to ayayay-500 [2019-06-02 19:45:22 +0000 UTC]

Fuck it. There's no bright side. Even though Kalashnikov Concern's new products like AM/AMB-17 (Proposed AKS-74U/AS Val replacement) & SR1 (their new competition semi-auto rifle) both have ambidextrous controls, they somehow don't implement it on their AK-400s.


Like.. what the fuck?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tevo77777 [2018-04-13 00:27:37 +0000 UTC]

What about the AK-200? Does that not count?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to Tevo77777 [2018-04-13 17:10:55 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure. There aren't many good reference pictures, and some sources are run by 11-year-old gun experts, who constantly mess facts up, requiring more side research than it's worth.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TunaPlatinum [2017-11-15 12:35:00 +0000 UTC]

Opinion wise,the AK74 has pretty good performance though even its a lower caliber variant that replaced the original 7.62 Kalashnikov from the Cold War Era.I just see the AK-12 as a 5.45x39 Kalash that has rails on the receiver and handguard by default.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to TunaPlatinum [2017-11-15 13:23:13 +0000 UTC]

The 2016 "final production" model is, plus the two-round burst mode nobody asked for. The earlier protos at least had the redesigned ambidextrous controls.

The 5.45 round replaced the 7.62 because the ammo is much lighter, and is not as unnecesarily powerful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TunaPlatinum In reply to DeeVeeCee [2017-11-15 13:29:40 +0000 UTC]

having a Kalash with multiple firing modes makes it a SG550 series assault rifle though (however the select fire mode sort of resembles ones from Heckler&Koch's SMG and Assault rifle controls)
Good thing they cancelled it though,by looks its just a AK that has factory rails on that nobody asked for

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to TunaPlatinum [2017-11-15 18:30:39 +0000 UTC]

Well, the Picatinny rails are a good addition, but they are unnecessary for an ARMY weapon. Plus, the burst mode for such a slow-firing rifle (600 RPM) is completely unnecessary.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Altitude6 [2017-11-08 14:42:37 +0000 UTC]

Oh that clears things up,

got confused while trying to model the first prototype, without realizing that it was a prototype.

Thanks.


But you seem pretty salty about Russia doing the AK 12 project, what's wrong with it? (I'm not an actual soldier btw, just curious)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to Altitude6 [2017-11-08 23:05:04 +0000 UTC]

Oh, I'm so fed up with Russia's horseshit. "Crimea is ours", ridiculously expensive stadiums that get "damaged by birds", "sanctions do us good", and so on. And this? Winning a contest with a sorta cool ambidextrous rifle, to hastily get back to the same old AK with more rails? Fuck me, right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tevo77777 [2017-09-11 05:30:05 +0000 UTC]

The T-14 Armada is also being produced in much smaller numbers than they first claimed.

Seems there was this wave of ambition and experimentation, and then it died.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to Tevo77777 [2017-09-11 07:06:14 +0000 UTC]

Oh, that happens every now and then. Civilian and military aircraft, which are told as being superior in every way to all western counterparts, and mass production and export is planned. Then we have that aircraft carrier thing that is apparently broken now.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ComannderrX [2017-09-10 16:33:28 +0000 UTC]

wow...the 2016 AK-12 sure looks different form the somewhat more well known 2013 AK-12, and even more so from the 1991 AK-74M

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to ComannderrX [2017-09-10 16:35:21 +0000 UTC]

It' a downgrade, really. I even drew it using the 74 base.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MustachedBain [2017-09-08 12:17:02 +0000 UTC]

2016 model is sexy

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

skyrish10 In reply to MustachedBain [2017-10-05 04:42:40 +0000 UTC]

For me, the 2016 model looks a lot like the AK-47 from MW2 and 3, i personally prefer the 2013 version of the AK-12

Actually the 2013 to 2015 versions of the AK-12 is based on the AK-200 prototype series, while the 2016 model is based on the AK-400 prototype.

The AK-200 prototype (which the 2013-2015 version based on) was scrapped because the Russian Army’s concerns regarding the issues in fully automatic fire and the cost of the earlier prototype models and is also expected to be much cheaper to build, so yeah.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DeeVeeCee In reply to MustachedBain [2017-09-08 12:20:07 +0000 UTC]

A little "tacticool" never hurt a classic AK. It just isn't worth replacing the shitloads of AK-74Ms for the regular army.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MustachedBain In reply to DeeVeeCee [2017-09-08 12:37:53 +0000 UTC]

Why not?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to MustachedBain [2017-09-08 14:17:08 +0000 UTC]

As I said, the regular army does not need the Picatinny rails. The scope mounts on AK-74Ms are equally worthless, since only spec ops and various SWAT-like guys can mount anything on them. That, and replacing a perfectly fine simple weapon system with an identical one with more useless rails is counter-productive. It will cost a small fortune or two, and will take obnoxiously long time.

I don't wanna pay bigger taxes just so some pseudo-patriotic fools would get new toys to "protect Motherland" somewhere in Syria or Ukraine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheOtherKevinFromSP [2017-09-08 11:45:57 +0000 UTC]

Wow

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thormemeson [2016-01-23 17:21:43 +0000 UTC]

nice work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DeeVeeCee In reply to thormemeson [2016-01-23 21:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0