HOME | DD

Dionisic — Transparency and reflections 2

Published: 2010-09-24 11:01:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 944; Favourites: 41; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description ...
Related content
Comments: 24

AlecBell [2010-11-03 14:23:26 +0000 UTC]

Parallel worlds?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to AlecBell [2010-11-03 14:41:14 +0000 UTC]

Based on the proportions, you can conclude which world I like more. But I still have not found the door.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlecBell In reply to Dionisic [2010-11-03 18:13:24 +0000 UTC]

I'm looking too. I'll let you know if I get lucky

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to AlecBell [2010-11-03 18:17:38 +0000 UTC]

Hurry up searching, because I am Aries in the horoscope, and I could easily break my head.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

AlecBell In reply to Dionisic [2010-11-03 18:29:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

roadmouse [2010-10-06 08:34:01 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful shot, beautiful print!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-06 08:37:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! Unfortunately, it is digital.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roadmouse In reply to Dionisic [2010-10-06 08:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Just different tools to get the job done. It's a great shot. And I just love the silvery look

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-06 08:57:37 +0000 UTC]

I still prefer film photos, but I don't know anything about it.
Digital photos are too cold, too plastic, too precise (special kind of sharpness and registration of all, without reducing), and only sometimes I manage to make them to look like film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roadmouse In reply to Dionisic [2010-10-06 09:13:23 +0000 UTC]

I know what you mean. Digital is very convenient, but for me it still can't beat an silver look. Even if it's a Photoshoped one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-06 09:26:35 +0000 UTC]

I have concluded that technically it is not impossible for digital photography to reach and overtake the quality of film in the future, but only in ideal terms. Because, I think that creators for the software of digital technique simply can not elaborate all the elements that are in the film chemistry. At this moment their algorithms are too simple.
It's like androids: they can move and speak, but their creators are not God, and therefore they can not add soul into them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roadmouse In reply to Dionisic [2010-10-06 10:30:27 +0000 UTC]

I think the quality of digital is growing fast. And it already surpassed 35mm on most levels. Though I think it will be a while before they overtake medium or large format. (a Hasselblad with digital back excluded maybe )

But it's kind of ironic. Film camera's tried to get the sharp and clean results digital camera's have today. And digital camera's try to get the silvery 'film' look of an old film camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-06 10:43:42 +0000 UTC]

It is really ironic. And, therefore, something else I have noticed: many of the older photographers praise digital cameras, and many of younger prefer film.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

roadmouse In reply to Dionisic [2010-10-06 12:33:39 +0000 UTC]

That is funny

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to roadmouse [2010-10-06 13:23:11 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rastislav [2010-09-24 19:39:36 +0000 UTC]

I really enjoy your treatment in this image... it really makes me think of those cloudy days but with a warm glow... kind of like today here

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to Rastislav [2010-09-24 20:31:30 +0000 UTC]

These days are my favorite, not just for a photographing.
Thank you Richard very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rastislav In reply to Dionisic [2010-09-26 15:01:18 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

GeistWerk [2010-09-24 15:10:52 +0000 UTC]

nice atmosphere, I really like it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to GeistWerk [2010-09-24 17:43:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you kindly!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ninjadear [2010-09-24 11:12:16 +0000 UTC]

oh! i love this color

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to ninjadear [2010-09-24 11:17:13 +0000 UTC]

Me too, but I use it only when I think it corresponds to the general expression of specific photos.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ninjadear In reply to Dionisic [2010-09-24 13:25:02 +0000 UTC]

well, it is corresponding indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Dionisic In reply to ninjadear [2010-09-24 13:46:10 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0