HOME | DD

ElaineRose — Lesson 1: Identity and Motive
Published: 2011-01-16 18:52:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 3285; Favourites: 82; Downloads: 43
Redirect to original
Description So, now that we know characters are what makes the story, what makes the character?

There's a lot to the execution of a good character. I'm not going to pretend that I know everything about it, but there are two questions that the writer has to answer in order to make a reader care:

Who Are You? and What do you want?

Bonus points to all those having J. Michael Straczynski flashbacks right now. Let's use his magnificent Space Opera type epic Babylon 5 for an example. He used this technique masterfully, and was clever enough to put the questions right out there for the audience, with the angel placeholders the Vorlons asking the self-defining question Who Are You? and the demon placeholders the Shadows asking the selfish question What do you want? The heroes had to define whether they were heroes or not, making hard choices about the Who Are You, and the characters with developed redemption arcs had to grapple with the concept of What Do You Want, and all of the glorious and messy consequences of getting exactly what they asked for.

In Avatar: The Last Airbender, when Prince Zuko was about to go on the Heel Face Revolving Door (betraying both sides so often that we had to wonder "who is he with this week?"), his mentor says outright "You're going to have to start asking yourself the big questions—who are you, and what do you want?" And then Zuko did what Zuko did best, which was angst about it. He even had trippy fever dreams about the answers to this question. More development on this further down.

You see, the questions really boil down a lot of the philosophical and existential questions that people have about realizing potential and becoming contributing members of society. Hahaha. That's just the surface of it, and a really kitch* way of explaining things.

Take the first question: Who Are You? What is every "finding yourself" story going to answer? It's going to answer freaking Who Are You?. A lot of times they'll work in a scene where the hero/ine out right soliloquizes Who Am I? Disney is wonderful about defining this question for us in the form of song—"When will my reflection show who I am inside?" Honey, when you start cross dressing, join the army, kill some Huns, and otherwise fulfill the plot of the movie—that's when your reflection will show who you are inside. "There must be more than this provincial life!" Oh, there is, and he is a rich jerk banking on Stockholm Syndrome, Belle. (When you look at Disney sarcastically, so much opens up for reinterpretation.)

When answering the question of Who Are You? the writer is taking on the concept of Character Arc. How is the character going to change during the course of the story? Is the pageboy going to become the greatest philandering King of England ever? Who is your character at the beginning, and who is he at the end? Not all characters have a dynamic arc. Merlin didn't change too much. Gandalf did, but still fit the same old "cool, wise, mystic old guy" spot as he did before his big heroic sacrifice. Frodo went through a lot, but we always knew who he was—the selfless kid who was willing to endure all kinds of danger because It Was the Right Thing to Do. Back to Avatar, the hero Aang's Who Are You? is right in the title (in the American release). He's the big hero. He's the guy who has to put an end to all the junk that's gone wrong over the past hundred years. No pressure. But Zuko, the angsty dishonored prince of the Evil Empire has to find his own way to redemption through a twisting maze of Right, Wrong, Honorable/Dishonorable, and Lies. He keeps betraying people until he figures out which side is the right one. He had to overcome years of history and royal expectations to figure out who he was for himself.

So… that one's pretty existential and heavy. You can have a simple Who Am I? with characters who aren't going to undergo much development. You can have some pretty cool Who Am I?s who don't need much development, because they've already found themselves before the story started. A lot of mentors get this kind of attitude.

Now that we know that Who Are You? deals with Identity, let's move on to Motivation. Motivation is tied to What Do You Want?

Without conflict there is no story. Conflict can come in many forms—the stuff that keeps the hero from his romantic interest, from his objective, from his mission. Whatever he is being kept from is what he wants. In Eragon the hero wants to free the known world from the tyranny of the Evil Empire. Same goes for Luke Skywalker in Star Wars.  In The Hunger Games  the heroine wants mainly to survive, but she also wants to end the oppression of the Evil Empire. (Note that I am one person writing this, so if only one vein of examples come to me, only one vein of examples come to me. Please feel free to donate examples.) In romance novels the primary conflict is often a simple (or heinously complicated) Will They or Won't They (they will, fyi). Your hero needs to strive for something, or your reader can't root for anything to happen, except a speedy end to the novel/movie. In just about every caper story, What They Want is a thing. We read for the hijinks, but it's a device driven plot.

For those like me who grew up with Pokémon, there were many wonders of "If you hate him that much, why do you follow him around?" as far as Ash and Misty were concerned. Sorry, but a romantic subplot wasn't fleshed out enough to make it a viable explanation. Since Who Are You? doesn't answer, does What Do You Want? What did Ash want? He wanted to master all the Pokémon stuff. That's pretty much it. What did Misty want? I don't freaking know. I remember she was one of the cooler females on the cast, but then again she was the female lead. But let's count off the recurring females who actually did stuff—Misty, Jessie, Nurse Joy, and Officer Jenny. What did Jessie want? Overall she wanted to be rich and famous with a life of luxury and leisure. Day to day she wanted to steal the freaking Pikachu and get some recognition from her boss. Officer Jenny wanted to uphold the law. A few of her quirkier incarnations had—get this— other wants. Nurse Joy brought Pikachu back from the dead more times than 4Kids would ever let American children realize (that's a joke, as far as I know), and she was a prime one for having other interests. But what the heck did Misty want? To get the little eggshell thingie to do something for once? She obviously didn't want a man, because she left every potential match behind (even the one with Gary-Stu levels of perfection). Apparently she didn't want to have a Gym of her own, and the whole "I want to be recognized as my own person" plot was tapped out pretty early. What did she want? I don't know! If she did have any honest kind of motivation (friendship?) it wasn't active enough or independent enough to be memorable. Her motivations were episodic, so I connected a bit on a daily basis when I was a kid, but the story didn't grow up with me.

One story that did grow up with me was Labyrinth. We had it on VHS, and it was my Sick Day Movie. (Do kids still have those? The special movie that you always watched on the day you were home sick from school?) I have some friends who didn't grow up with that movie, and they're weirded out by what they saw of it. I don't blame them. But when I was a kid, I thought Sarah was one of the coolest heroines ever. As a child, my view of the infamous King Jareth was… simplistic. I thought he was cool, and kind of romantic giving Sarah that amazing dress and singing and stuff. But he was the bad guy, and he was going to lose! You just go to the searchbar and see what comes up for "Jareth and Sarah"—I'm not the only one the movie grew up for. So, in this skewed fairy tale, what's our motivation? What does Jareth want? Oh, there's conjecture about that… But the main lines people think along are Duty and Love. "Everything I've done I've done for you" indeed, Mr. Goblin King. What does Sarah want? She wants to Slay the Dragon and Save the Innocent! She wants to live her childhood fairytales in the role of the heroine and win (and once she's done that, she grows up… mostly). In the ballroom scene she wants to find her prince, and then she realizes that's not what she wants at all. She wants friends, and gets them. And, of course, she wants love… but that's another story. That's a separate story from the Coming of Age story of a sister trying to rescue her brother from the glittery king of the Goblins. You knew right from the beginning what she wanted, and you always had to wonder just what Jareth's ulterior motives were… *sigh*

I've failed at these things before. I tried to plot with such detail so far in advance to know my characters completely, that with a few main characters I completely left out What Do You Want, and it was no wonder that I had trouble writing such passive heroes. Other times I didn't know my characters, so the story stagnated even with great motivation. If I didn't know what they wanted or who they were, there wasn't much incentive to figure out more about them.

Give your character motivation and identity, or your reader can't connect. To make sure your character has these two basic features, ask your character the questions Who Are You? and What Do You Want?

You'll be surprised with what a character can think of to answer with.

*Kitch: A reference to art that is so mass-produced, watered down, and devalued over time to the point where it is so trite that it is only fit to be put on key-chains.
Related content
Comments: 18

Owlflight29 [2012-03-16 21:16:59 +0000 UTC]

i love lines like that!
"Who are you? What happened to you?"
"Where am i?"
"Let me get this straight..."
ETC ETC
in all they're fun

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ChasingGarra [2011-11-19 01:34:14 +0000 UTC]

I just found this and am so happy that you are doing this kind of thing, for i love t o write and will take any advice/lessons that i can get !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

velocity07 [2011-11-03 13:08:00 +0000 UTC]

My characters are typically very shady. I tend to write characters who either don't know who they are themselves or are insane. One of the best characters I ever created was a boy who, at first, came across as an insufferable asshole, but over the course of the story, turned into a real hero. I didn't even know he was going to be the hero when I started writing; it just happened. Sometimes not even the writer knows who their characters are. A story is a journey, not a destination.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to velocity07 [2011-11-04 14:52:58 +0000 UTC]

One of the things that I have learned as a writer is that the book you end up with is not the one you started writing (and thank God for that in many, many cases). But with the reveal thing, keep in mind that with every layer there needs to be some identity. Take, for example, Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho. That plays mercilessly with the concept of identity--the identity of a woman who makes one impulsive choice and the consequences that follow her. The identity of the hotel manager guy, who at first seems nice, then kinda creepy, and then to say anymore would be to invoke spoilers that do not do justice to the masterpiece that this movie is. Insanity is a fantastic tool, but identity must be present within it. (Same with Shutter Island, The Number 23, and The Dream House.)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

velocity07 In reply to ElaineRose [2011-11-06 00:04:39 +0000 UTC]

I've noticed that myself; rarely do my stories turn out the way I originally plan them. I've never seen Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, but I get what you're saying. I always try to make my characters as realistic as possible, and in reality people are complex. There are definitely personality traits present, but no one is one-dimensional; we may act honorably in one situation but deplorably in another, depending on multiple factors. And I, for one, love playing with readers' expectations. It's always fun and gratifying to take people by surprise. Heck, sometimes I take myself by surprise. Sometimes my characters take on a life of their own, which I find amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to velocity07 [2011-11-06 15:18:29 +0000 UTC]

And it's always fun to see them being creative.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

velocity07 In reply to ElaineRose [2011-11-06 16:30:56 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KippoTec [2011-11-02 06:22:00 +0000 UTC]

Love the "boiled down" approach to this. I'm learning a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to KippoTec [2011-11-04 14:53:45 +0000 UTC]

Yay, I always love to hear that these help people learn!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pika-Superkiwi [2011-11-02 04:37:09 +0000 UTC]

Misty wanted a bike if I recall...
and i think thats it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to Pika-Superkiwi [2011-11-02 20:04:23 +0000 UTC]

Yes, but is a bike really enough to keep you hanging around with the same person for several hundred episodes? I think not. There are a lot of things that go into a character's decisions. Misty was the "official love interest" for a character who had no interest in love, and her own goals were not strong enough until about the sixth season to draw her away to take care of herself rather than hang around with her friends, just waiting on a debt to be repaid.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pika-Superkiwi In reply to ElaineRose [2011-11-03 04:13:10 +0000 UTC]

I think the bike was her original intention, or perhaps just a plot device, but after traveling around for a while with Ash and Brock, she grew to enjoy being with them. It led her to make friends and then just sort of tag along.
It makes perfect sense that she stuck around just to stick around. But I think that basically, what you're saying, is that her lack of a real goal for most of the show made her less interesting and less relatable as a character....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NessyNoName [2011-11-01 23:54:39 +0000 UTC]

Your essays are wonderful! I love all the random examples that you've thrown in, everything from classic literature to Avatar and Pokemon! XD And I love your use of TVTropes! I'll be sure to keep reading.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to NessyNoName [2011-11-04 14:53:22 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

orange-manifesto [2011-01-17 22:59:29 +0000 UTC]

This essay reminds me of my teacher who told my class that all everyone needs and wants is a sense of security and significance. If you have those two things, everything will fall in place. Without them, there is conflict.

Now, I feel I have to explain myself because I don't do much writing and I feel like my style stands out. Ten minutes ago, I wrote a little academic essay ranting about kitsch art. After said essay, I decided to meander through the other literature out there to see what there was. I happened upon this piece. I laughed. I chortled. I was joyous at the fact that there is somebody else out there that is fed up with Mary Sue and Company. And then I read your little article about characters. I enjoyed that one too.

While I was reading your essay, I thought about the fact that what you are saying can be stated as simply as one sentence. After that, I scolded myself for being critical, because people need time to learn how to do anything and examples of the variety that might be available. After that, I considered my Math teacher, who does the very same thing. Now you and I both know that Writers Hate Math, but I think it's still example. So I have a suggestion: while you are writing your instructional essays on how to write, why don't you write example stories (as separate pieces of literature, possibly) and then analyze them. This way, you'll get writing practice, and your readers will get short, easily-accessible examples.

The end. My long and obnoxiously orderly soliloquy has finally stopped. Also, I think it's really awesome that you read TvTropes too.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to orange-manifesto [2011-01-17 23:19:23 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for your comment!

I was once at a writer's retreat where the last event was a panel of published authors and other publishing professionals, and the question came up: "What is the most important thing to writing?"
...After an awkward moment of "Did he seriously just ask that question?" the writers began chiming in with the things that they had learned (apparently, POV is everything. Every. Freaking. Thing. Thank you, Type A personality writer. Shut up now please.), and this taught me a very important lesson: There is no correct answer. Artists and writers belong to a profession known for its high instances of insanity and emotionally destructive behavior. That said, Screw The Rules--I'm A Writer.

As to the essay instead of one sentence: Yes, I could get this into a single thesis statement if I wanted to. But I don't. If I've learned one thing from my teaching experience in the past, it's that you don't give the student one thing, say "learn it," and go about your merry way.
I'm trying to nugget things down for a mentorship project and teach what I can with what I have, but this all is just one lesson at a time. Maybe your one sentence is the Holy Grail of writing (and so shiny too!), but I'm not going to care unless it helps me or gets me chocolate.

...I'm not being sarcastic, I promise! (Well, a little...) This sounds much more lighthearted on my end.

And I do do companion pieces for these lessons for the my mentee/apprentice. For the body of work I just decided to keep it to examples I'm familiar with.

(And thanks for the fave!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

orange-manifesto In reply to ElaineRose [2011-01-17 23:48:21 +0000 UTC]

I just looked at my previous comment and noticed some major grammar issues. While it's still intelligible, I apologize for the pain it might have caused you (as it did for me).

Don't you just hate it when people try to be overly simplistic? It drives me crazy. It's like saying, "Draw what you see" and ignoring the fact that learning to draw is much harder than that. At the same time, I guess I am one of those people that likes to summarize whole books in a few sentences. Different people have different learning styles. (Plus the fact that the people who like to write single, potent sentences tend to be the people that hate writing long, beautiful paragraphs.)

Don't worry about the sarcasm. It makes me laugh. In fact, you should continue on your sarcastic way, because it's part of the reason I gave your essay the fave.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElaineRose In reply to orange-manifesto [2011-01-18 02:07:40 +0000 UTC]

Oversimplification in speech can really hamper the message, in my experience at least. I tend towards verbosity instead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0