HOME | DD

Published: 2009-04-02 11:35:20 +0000 UTC; Views: 642; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description
Antwerpen, Centraal Station. One of the most spectacular train stations that I've ever seen - each of the floors are terminus train platforms, except for the bottom level where there's a through connection, among others for the high speed Thalys Amsterdam-Paris. All this was constructed leaving the stunning 1905 station hall building and the canopy in place. [link] (Wikipedia English)Tech talk: apart from the frame, this is just me and my camera - no dramatic crops or poignant adjustment layers.
Taken on the same place:
Related content
Comments: 38
EricForFriends In reply to TheLoneGunmen [2009-04-04 11:17:32 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much, Tom!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Eliza-mac [2009-04-02 15:41:24 +0000 UTC]
That's interesting, how the trains are "upstairs".
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-02 15:55:00 +0000 UTC]
It's even more spectacular - they're spread out over four or five levels, on top of each other - you can see the lowest level (international trains to Amsterdam, Brussels and France) somewhere in the picture, and somewhere in between one of the levels is for the city 'metro'. And on top of it all if a beautiful Belle Epoque station and arrivals hall. It's a photographers' paradise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-02 21:59:44 +0000 UTC]
Train stations here are so boring
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-02 22:03:03 +0000 UTC]
You must have a tunnel under England to the continent, with flashy trains running through it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-02 23:21:51 +0000 UTC]
The trains would be be too wide, the tunnel too short and it would wind up taking 20 years longer than anticipated to build and at 300 times the original cost. Oh, and some corrupt official would decide building a tunnel from pasta fits in with safety standards
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-03 05:50:52 +0000 UTC]
Oh well, Ireland is not alone on this. In Cologne some company f#@ked up the building of a metro tunnel and the entire city archives collapsed. The same company is building a tunnel under Amsterdam and has already caused for millions damage to 17th century houses (damage=they maight collapse as well) and everyone wonders what's going to follow.
BTW, I like your sig, I've been wondering if I should do the same, if that's okay with you. May we could even do some "Street Awareness Week" and ask the Yard members to do the same for some time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-03 08:05:52 +0000 UTC]
I thought the Dublin port tunnel was the biggest "joke" ever, it's sad to learn that it is not!
The sig thing is fine with me I had to shorten mine, dA wouldn't allow my street essay as a siggy Though miscats drive me nuts I don't like being a bully on comment threads. I have noted a few people, good work but wrong category. One responded with a thank you note, he didn't understand a lot of the categories, most don't answer, and another told me they could put their work in whatever category they damned well pleased!
... which sort of cancels out the need for categories in the first place
Street Awareness Week sounds like a plan... and educational sigs
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-03 08:34:56 +0000 UTC]
Test... test... how do you like it? My only regret is that I couldn't include the birthdaycake.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-03 08:56:18 +0000 UTC]
Shame about the
but you might be mistaken for Marie Antoinette with that attached
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-03 09:25:34 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, true. I'd love to add some carrot to the stick though, like "Miscats get less faves" or "Get the Right Attention!"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-03 08:18:12 +0000 UTC]
It drives me nuts too but I keep reminding myself that some people just don't have a clue (actually Stuart had to point me out what "Industrial" actually was) and on top of that, there's the language problem. Maybe our French, Russian, Indonesian and Turkish fellow Street-lovers could help out there; and dA should make the definitions visible, instead of hiding them behind the (i). It will never go away, but any improvement would be welcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-03 08:46:19 +0000 UTC]
I find some of the categories confusing... like, I don't really understand why there is a darkroom category I removed most of my traditional darkroom work because of scanner problems, I think I have 4 left in my gallery but under subject matter rather than how they were processed. "Back in my day" darkroom photography was done using an artwork camera in a finished art department darkroom, the rest was just... photography
The definitions should be made visible, we need to lobby
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Eliza-mac [2009-04-03 10:09:08 +0000 UTC]
Oh, don't get me started... I think the categories are fundamentally flawed.
They're based on content (architecture, street, nature) as well as medium (dark room) as well as purpose (photojournalism, commercial). These intersect, and at those points, even sensible people won't know where to post. On top of that, Photomanipulation is a de facto fantasy category, and on the other many serious people still believe that you should put your HDR there; and even dA staff seem to confuse 'conceptual' with 'surreal'...
And then digital darkroom: 'Photographs that have undergone significant digital enhancements using computer software.' What's 'significant'? What's a computer? If my camera can make better choices than I do in some situations, I think it's a
#
computer. That would make any non-RAW picture a Digital Darkroom case. Digital Darkroom made sense when Photoshop was this exciting new thing, but otherwise it's so 1992. I estimate that 95 percent of digital pictures has been digitally enhanced these days.
Besides, even when I'm experimenting with HDR, it's still a means to an end for me, like a pola-filter, a flash or even the shutter on my camera. What matters for me is the content on the picture. Darkroom should be for people who want to tinker with technology at best, preferably under psychiatrical supervision.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Eliza-mac In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-04 21:51:18 +0000 UTC]
"What matters for me is the content on the picture. Darkroom should be for people who want to tinker with technology at best, preferably under psychiatrical supervision."
That should be engraved somewhere in dA!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZCochrane In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-03 07:16:24 +0000 UTC]
Well, they are actually still debating what company was most responsible, as it seems that suddenly nobody knows who was responsible for what anymore. But I didn't know that Amsterdam had similar problems, that's both interesting and chilling.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to ZCochrane [2009-04-03 07:36:23 +0000 UTC]
A whole row of monumental houses had to be cleared of inhabitants and boarded up, because of the shifting soil. And, oh irony, what's a few hundred metres down the projected route: the city archives, recently housed in a monumental 1920s building. [link] ) (Dutch-only, sorry.)
You can see the beginning of the works but not yet the damage in Google Streetview - look for Amsterdam Vijzelstraat.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ZCochrane [2009-04-02 15:37:01 +0000 UTC]
I like a station that does not hide it's trains. There are too many in Germany (e.g. Hanover central) where you walk through a shopping mall with only the destination displays telling you that there might be railroads around. This one here looks like a nice station, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to ZCochrane [2009-04-02 15:58:54 +0000 UTC]
IMHO, 'nice' is an understatement. It combines impressive, beautiful old with spectacular modern railway architecture, and never for a minute you'll forget you're in a station. It used to be a backwater (coming from the Netherlands or France, you had to change to a local train on a drab suburban station to get there), but now it has a Thalys connection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ZCochrane In reply to EricForFriends [2009-04-02 18:41:02 +0000 UTC]
Sounds great, I have to go there some day!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to ZCochrane [2009-04-03 05:53:21 +0000 UTC]
You won't be disappointed, I plan to do the same on a nice day, going without non-photographing partner, so I'll have plenty of time there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Encephalartos [2009-04-02 12:38:30 +0000 UTC]
I've always liked the mirror effect on the -1 level, where the lights between the red brick walls converge.
I was only there 5 minutes ago, and thinking about taking a picture, but my time schedule was strict :-p.
The people on the picture wonderfully break the symmetry
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EricForFriends In reply to Encephalartos [2009-04-02 12:51:10 +0000 UTC]
I think it's one of these places where you take pictures for a lifetime - but I only had 15 minutes or so myself.
I like the whole idea of the new station - breathing life into this majestic but dead end fin the siecle building and doing it in such a spectacular way without harming the original fabric, and the concept of putting train tracks on top of each other. I counted five levels including the metro, but I wasn't sure one was used.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EricForFriends In reply to StamatisGR [2009-04-02 12:52:00 +0000 UTC]
Thanks very much, Stamatis, also for the fave!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1