HOME | DD

erikson1 In reply to PettyRelic [2011-12-01 08:41:03 +0000 UTC]

really? sounds like it prompts you to speech.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PettyRelic In reply to erikson1 [2011-12-01 08:43:33 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, does it?

But, damn, just look at that.

Why would you do such thing?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

erikson1 In reply to PettyRelic [2011-12-01 08:45:11 +0000 UTC]

because I was paid to do so

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PettyRelic In reply to erikson1 [2011-12-01 08:47:37 +0000 UTC]

Everything suddenly makes much more sense, arguably.

Still, stuff like this is beyond me, and people who enjoy such art.

It's a fucking kid's cartoon for fuck's sake.

I'm out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

erikson1 In reply to PettyRelic [2011-12-01 08:49:43 +0000 UTC]

meh, I know adults who watched and enjoyed it...can I know what kind of media you are allowed to adapt into art such as this?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PettyRelic In reply to erikson1 [2011-12-01 09:03:09 +0000 UTC]

There's porn, hentai, or whatever you want to call it.

Then there's cartoons.

These things should be kept separated.

Though I'm not a God who can say what's right and what's wrong, it just feels plaing wrong

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

erikson1 In reply to PettyRelic [2011-12-01 09:04:46 +0000 UTC]

this is not porn or hentai, can you identify a sex act in the pic? Do you consider maid outfits inherently pornographic?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

PettyRelic In reply to erikson1 [2011-12-01 09:11:23 +0000 UTC]

Even a blind person would see that it's most certainly a sex act, I've been here long enough to know it, you know it, stop trying to make me look bad.

You're impossible to reasonably argue with.

Farewell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

erikson1 In reply to PettyRelic [2011-12-01 10:16:24 +0000 UTC]

there is no sex act...no intention of sex in this scenario. You arrogate to your self the power to read my mind and intentions yet get defensive with my mild disagreements. Grow up-yeah I agree farewel

👍: 0 ⏩: 0