HOME | DD

FractalMonster — Eve of Destruction by-nc-sa

Published: 2013-03-28 12:32:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 692; Favourites: 20; Downloads: 12
Redirect to original
Description Download for 1960x1470 resolution

This is the same motive as the previous They coming to take me away. However here only the set which is common to both M+ (the gray elements) and M- (the red elements) in the above mentioned motive is drawn. That is CCL (Cubic Connectedness Locus), the full analogy to the Mandelbrot set for quadratic polynomials. Although there are disconnected balls, all elements are connected in the 4th dimension, this motive only being a 3D cutoff of the four dimensional monster. See article 23, especially the illustrations, in my Chaotic series.

More about cubics can be read about in my Cubic Tutorial and Short about drawing pictures of cubic parameter space. So also in my Chaotic series.

The image is rendered using a special module for Ultra Fractal, the module written by my very dear friend Greenseng her on dA. All his modules, as well as mine can be downloaded from here. Resized 4800x 3600. About the use of this perticular formula, see my journal Some remarks about the UF formula Raytrace2.

Below the parameter file Play and have fun

EveOfDestruction {
fractal:
title="Eve of Destruction" width=640 height=480 layers=1
credits="Ingvar Kullberg;3/28/2013"
layer:
caption="Background" opacity=100 method=linear
mapping:
center=-0.291193181765/0.78132102297 magn=11.192369
formula:
maxiter=1000 percheck=off filename="spr.ufm" entry="Raytrace2"
p_maxiter=1000 p_bailout=100.0 p_precision=10
p_Formula="Cubic Parameterspace" p_Fourth__Dimension=b_real
p_Plotted_Space="a_real; a_imag; b_real" p_Fourth_Dimension=Zk
p_Fourth_Dim=C_imag p_Fourth__Dim=Ck p_view=no p_MSet=CCL
p_QMSet=Union p_init_zri=0/0 p_init__zri=0.5/0.0 p_init_zjk=0.0/0.0
p_init__zjk=0.0/0.0 p_cri1=-0.7/0.0 p_cjk1=0.0/0.0 p_cri2=-0.7/0.0
p_cjk2=0.0/0.0 p_cri3=-0.7/0.0 p_cjk3=0.0/0.0 p_bri=0.0/0.0
p_bjk=0.0/0.0 p_xrot=-8.0 p_yrot=-20.0 p_zrot=0.0 p_localrot=no
p_lightx=4.0 p_lighty=4.0 p_lightz=4.0 p_a_real=0.0 p_a_imag=0.0
p_b_real=0.0 p_b_imag=0.0 p_c_real=0.0 p_c_imag=0.0 p_fourthdim=0.0
p_zcenter=0.0 p_zlength=4.0 p_zpixels=480 p_touchscreen=no
p_Coloring=None p_Background=Solid p_Gradient="One Gradient"
p_Cubic_Gradient="Four Gradients" p_Quartic_Gradient="One Gradient"
inside:
transfer=none
outside:
transfer=linear
gradient:
smooth=no index=0 color=5899588 index=49 color=3185381 index=229
color=12582911 index=300 color=1716464
opacity:
smooth=no index=0 opacity=255
}
Related content
Comments: 6

aishi1nightworrior12 [2013-06-27 20:27:45 +0000 UTC]

Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stabripemo23 [2013-04-02 00:28:16 +0000 UTC]

This strangely looks like a closeup of an oil painting

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to stabripemo23 [2013-04-02 10:11:22 +0000 UTC]

In fact it's the elements which are the red and gray parts of [link] have together Maybe not so obvious 3D look ..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stabripemo23 In reply to FractalMonster [2013-04-11 01:46:43 +0000 UTC]

Weird...I like this one better, to be honest

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FractalMonster In reply to stabripemo23 [2013-04-11 09:32:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you That's a matter of taste I like both

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stabripemo23 In reply to FractalMonster [2013-04-15 00:50:44 +0000 UTC]

of course. You're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0