HOME | DD

Published: 2012-10-03 21:03:11 +0000 UTC; Views: 4507; Favourites: 280; Downloads: 87
Redirect to original
Description
..Related content
Comments: 36
IllEatYourself In reply to IllEatYourself [2012-10-14 23:01:52 +0000 UTC]
I am guessing you double-exposed or double-photographed these pictures? Because I can easily see this being the result of such a thing.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephanePellennec In reply to IllEatYourself [2012-10-15 05:46:49 +0000 UTC]
13/10 second
I'd think of long exposure with movement of the camera and zooming during the exposure.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
geissa In reply to StephanePellennec [2012-10-15 20:57:36 +0000 UTC]
this is the case with most of my photographies (long exposure, movement and zooming during exposure).. thank you very much for the support.. great honour..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IllEatYourself In reply to StephanePellennec [2012-10-15 16:52:53 +0000 UTC]
Oh. I originally thought it could be that, but then I figured the images wouldn't seem so clear and separate at the same time if that were the case and that they would look more like one big blur.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
StephanePellennec In reply to IllEatYourself [2012-10-16 06:00:49 +0000 UTC]
Good result demands practise.
Please look at the artist's comment above yours
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
IllEatYourself In reply to StephanePellennec [2012-10-16 16:59:06 +0000 UTC]
I think I get what you mean. I just mean I figured long exposure would be like that picture of the stars' movement during the night: everything is blurred. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LCVII [2012-10-14 22:12:30 +0000 UTC]
To come in or to not come in? Or maybe out? Also could be indecision... anyway, very good work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MrBassMan6132 [2012-10-14 19:18:53 +0000 UTC]
Thought this was a stereogram at first glance.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TaNa-Jo [2012-10-14 12:49:18 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful piece ! It will be featured in our group if you allow it
In our Featured folder.
You are cheerful invited to join us
#All-Art-Wanted
👍: 0 ⏩: 0