HOME | DD

HamJava In reply to ??? [2005-04-19 22:06:11 +0000 UTC]

lol, theyre crazily long!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arreis-Kurai In reply to HamJava [2005-04-28 03:05:53 +0000 UTC]

but they still look good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to Arreis-Kurai [2005-04-28 22:36:27 +0000 UTC]

well thank you very very very very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Arreis-Kurai In reply to HamJava [2005-04-28 23:28:39 +0000 UTC]

anytime ~_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to Pau-Norontaus [2005-04-11 22:07:12 +0000 UTC]

lol, thanks!
havent decided what she is yet though!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pau-Norontaus In reply to HamJava [2005-04-11 22:08:56 +0000 UTC]

Heh, no prob ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to Ranku [2005-04-04 20:27:58 +0000 UTC]

thanks!
i dunno what the heck she is though!
any suggestions?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ranku In reply to HamJava [2005-04-05 02:52:04 +0000 UTC]

uh... assasin?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to Ranku [2005-04-05 23:24:47 +0000 UTC]

cool!
i guess she is then!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Ranku In reply to HamJava [2005-04-06 00:12:45 +0000 UTC]

WOOOOOOOOOOO! LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to tat2puppy [2005-04-04 20:26:07 +0000 UTC]

im glad!
i drew her at about 5 o clock in the morning in a friends house after watching the crow

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tat2puppy In reply to HamJava [2005-04-05 01:51:00 +0000 UTC]

in the crow, did the guy die?(when he got shot by a gun, I herd he REALY died)

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

HamJava In reply to tat2puppy [2005-04-05 23:08:44 +0000 UTC]

yup, dunno if it was the gun though but he died in that scene!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to tat2puppy [2005-04-05 23:07:50 +0000 UTC]

yup, dunno if it was the gun though but he died in that scene!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tat2puppy In reply to HamJava [2005-04-07 00:36:27 +0000 UTC]

oh, I thought so

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to tat2puppy [2005-04-07 15:01:20 +0000 UTC]

so obviously hes not in the sequel

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tat2puppy In reply to HamJava [2005-04-07 23:59:18 +0000 UTC]

haha, I should have known

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to tat2puppy [2005-04-08 12:28:22 +0000 UTC]

stands to reason, lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tat2puppy In reply to HamJava [2005-04-09 00:54:12 +0000 UTC]

ha

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to Areku26 [2005-04-04 20:24:10 +0000 UTC]

pervert!
thanks sooooooo much though!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Areku26 In reply to HamJava [2005-04-05 17:14:28 +0000 UTC]

lol, i'm a pervert?!? sexy isnt a perverted word, is it?! ;_;

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to Areku26 [2005-04-05 23:29:08 +0000 UTC]

no! im only messing with you!
dont cry!
im so horrible!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Areku26 In reply to HamJava [2005-04-06 00:58:00 +0000 UTC]

naw its ok. wheeee~!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to Areku26 [2005-04-06 17:34:45 +0000 UTC]

LOL! great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-03 19:40:34 +0000 UTC]

model scaling?
never heard the term before
give yourself credit! you are great!
and you probably will get MUCH better than me!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-04 03:32:24 +0000 UTC]

Right. Ummm...models are usually 7-8 heads high, occasionally 6.5 in contrast to the 'normal' scaling system, sorry I've done a lot with the field and sometimes ramble off.
I'm not great. and definitly not better than you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-04 22:08:53 +0000 UTC]

nothing wrong with a good ramble!
i enjoy findin out stuff like this!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-05 00:44:26 +0000 UTC]

I'm glad you feel that way--you watch me, that's what you get sometimes...
Heh no prob, a lot of people forget about the 7-8 heights.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-05 23:04:39 +0000 UTC]

lol, now i remember!
we were taught abot the 8.5 heads high at my summer course! silly me!
its kinda instinctive though
you can usually tell if it looks right without measuring

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-06 01:19:16 +0000 UTC]

*nods*
Yeah I know. It's different for some people though; they can't tell without measuring.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-06 17:53:12 +0000 UTC]

lol! ill probably pe like that in college
very precise

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-07 02:28:19 +0000 UTC]

Of course....*is doubting this a bit*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-07 15:08:42 +0000 UTC]

yeah, ill probably slack and estimate like usual, im so predictable

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-07 21:35:38 +0000 UTC]

*laughs* Awww...that's okay

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-07 23:28:38 +0000 UTC]

as long as i dont make a mess of things its ok!
in that respect im quite un-predictable!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-10 02:20:06 +0000 UTC]

I think...you're ranting...just a wee bit....
But it's quite alright being both un-predictable as well as predictable can be a wonderful thing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-10 13:20:28 +0000 UTC]

such is life!
ya gotta expect the un-expected but not forget about the expected either or else you wont expect them! now THATS a rant!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

softcenteregg In reply to HamJava [2005-04-11 01:36:26 +0000 UTC]

So it is.
o.O Wow...okay yes, that is a rant, I think I'll quote you on that as well...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to softcenteregg [2005-04-11 17:09:30 +0000 UTC]

you think its quote worthy?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HamJava In reply to HyperCrow [2005-04-03 19:23:41 +0000 UTC]

perfect? y'dont get much better than that!
give yourself credit! youre great!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperCrow In reply to HamJava [2005-04-03 23:56:48 +0000 UTC]

Not really XD I've never seen such a perfect body sketch! I should be learning from you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HamJava In reply to HyperCrow [2005-04-04 20:22:54 +0000 UTC]

*blush*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HyperCrow In reply to HamJava [2005-04-04 21:02:45 +0000 UTC]

Awww ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0