LaurieLefebvre In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 11:14:42 +0000 UTC]

I always wanted to try tattooing, who will let me practice on them?? I think it's a lovely art form.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jecana456 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 11:12:51 +0000 UTC]

1. For me, they are equally important.

2. I'm not sure about that. I don't really know anything about the history of art itself so I couldn't answer that question.

3. It's like this: the person requesting for a tattoo is the writer, then that person would give a "draft" of the story that person want to have on their body. The tattoo artist is the person who "edits" the story and make it move vivid and more presentable. Then when they both agree, it is put upon the blank canvas of life that's called our body.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Bezzie-Landhog In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 11:10:33 +0000 UTC]

:> Which author is more important in the tattooing of the body - the tattoo artists or the one to become the living canvas?
:> This is a tricky one... I guess it would be the tattooist, bacause they are the tallent, and the tattooee is (as it says in the question) just a living canvas. On the other hand, if no one got tattoo's then tattooists wouldn't exist!
I guess, that they're both as important as each other; both being essential halves of a sigular end result.

:> Do you consider tattoo art to be the first “interactive” artform?
:> I'm not an expert on ancient history, but I would think that the first interactive art pieces would be things like stonehenge, ancient temples, etc. They are installations/sculptures, that people would interact with in the form of prayer. Although some may have been classed as 'art' after they were first built, and after tattooing was considered an artform.

:> b>How would you describe the unique relationship between tattoo artist and the person being tattooed?
:> A tattooist and tattooee, rally do have a completely unique ralationship indeed. I think that the artist's mind and the client's skin are fused together by the artwork. In a way, a third person is created, at the same time as two people becoming one. Kind of like the two people give birth to a child, formed from the skin and mind from two people.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mevlitbolukbas In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 09:55:09 +0000 UTC]

süper :

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Tonfish In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 09:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Most of the tattoos I come across are not "art" because they don't have a meaning, expression in them. Rather they are just special "decorations" to feel the tattoed person more unique. If the person has a specific reason about the tattoo itself, be it the most simple or the most cimplicated, I call it art.

1. It's a changing status. Firstly, the person being tattoed is more important because he/she needs the courage, creativity and open mind to come up with something and be able to tell it to the tattoer. Then the tattoer of course, most of the time the artist has only a general idea about the tat and h/she must come up with something specific. This is when the tat artist's creativity comes in and where the tattoer can truly show his "art". But his/her role is finished as the tattoo is finished and from that time the living canvas has to bear the weight of that art piece whether it's good or not.

2. I don't like to sort these kinds of things after one and another. Especially since I consider speaking and talking an art as well.

3. Trust, self-knowledge, understanding.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

maleficent-me In reply to Tonfish [2011-08-05 10:41:32 +0000 UTC]

Having both decorative and meaningful tattoos myself i completely agree. i have come across alot of people that seem to think this is black or white ether they are all meaningful or all decorative. i have large tattoos that i have solely drawn or had done on a pure self improvement/individuality level as well as large tattoos that have been designed by me or other to represent personal concepts.

im not sure of this been classed as interactive art as this category is quite a large umbrella topic and then comes the trouble of where do you draw lines? are we not also defining our selfs by the clothes we wear, hair style, representational and sentimental jewellery we wear, piercings. Also like you i class speaking as an art form

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lanaz97 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 09:13:11 +0000 UTC]

I love the Artistic meaning of tattoo art. But i believe it is stupid and a waste if u get something not meaningful or something just to copy everyone else. Tattooing is a brilliant way to express your love for the arts.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SpyderRogue In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 09:08:36 +0000 UTC]

I absolutely agree their should be a tattoo section in the tabs on the left. There are many tattoo artists already here on DeviantArt, I know many of them, they upload their artwork, on other mediums besides flesh. Tattoos are beautiful and their is some amazing art you will never see elsewhere, I constantly stop people to see the colors, shading, and lines, and always ask why? what did it mean to you, why did you get it? Many great stories.
OK now for your questions

Which Author is more important? That can be taken in many ways. I work with some of the most talented artists in the industry here in So Cal. (no, I do not tattoo, I promote) , And I have had this discussion with them as well, and these respected artists, say that once it's on a persons body, it belongs to those who wear it. Both parties are a key element to the art, the receiver must have an idea, and many come with sketches to do exactly or for the artist to add their own touch. It is a team effort in all. Adn If it is done well, the art wearer will hopefully share the artists name with those who inquire on the work,


Yes, I absolutely believe that tattoo art is the first “interactive” artform?, and Hieroglyphs the first of art.

The Relationship between the tattoo artist and their living canvas is Just that, a relationship. It's a teamwork effort to create the final masterpiece. They may have to get together several times from start to finish, some even take years., Mostly because the art and their relationship are constantly growing. they become friends and many times, just like family and end up BBQ'in together on the weekends. The different kinds of relationships in this world; Family, friends, lovers, and tattoo artists and their canvas'.
Peace, SpyderRogue
deviantART muro drawing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dragonflame15 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 08:31:04 +0000 UTC]

i think tattoos are an art form, anything that expresses/depicts your experiences in life is what i consider art. although i wouldn't get a tattoo myself, not a big fan of them. on the other hand, i do like the designs though, they're interesting

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rennakid62 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 08:06:01 +0000 UTC]

Tattoo's are art! just like art depicts things from your life or your emotions tattoo's do exactly the same! only you get to show it off everywhere you go!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DemiFitzherbert In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 07:54:51 +0000 UTC]

Tattoos are def art! They express yourself, and make the viewer feel or think something whether it be negative or positive!
That makes it art.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FireGodess440 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 07:45:42 +0000 UTC]

Tattoos are a fantastic art work, i've always been fascinated by them in one way... maybe ill become a tattooist!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MemaidGirl In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 07:44:27 +0000 UTC]

i think its both coz if the tattoos has done the tattoo before he or she knows how ta do it right and to go with ther person and if the person made the tattoo like i have made one they to are in a way.
yeah i really think that tattoos are a form of art because it shows what the person is like but a simple ink on the skin and loads of tattoos look lovely and i will always consider it as art. the form of relastionship between the tattoosis and person being tattooed is trust they both trust that it will go well and will chat while its being done which might form a friendship if the tattoo takes a long time to do
i want a tattoo real bad but a mate of mine won't let me have a skull with red roses on it which always go so im going for a black rose with the japanese symbol for rose underneath what ya think???

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Khaotic-Soul In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 06:51:41 +0000 UTC]

Definitely!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

gabrielitaa In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 06:47:43 +0000 UTC]

love this kind of art!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Twisted-XP In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:42:23 +0000 UTC]

Neither is more important. Both the artist and the canvas are equally important...without one there cannot be the other.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

maleahasmile In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:25:35 +0000 UTC]

I really can’t say that one is more important than the other when it comes to the artist or the person being tattooed. The artist does the actual art but if I were to get a tattoo I have an idea of what I want and the style I want it done in. It is more a collaboration. I can’t think of anyone that goes in to get a tattoo and just flips a coin to the mercy of the tattoo artist. Some artists create work from scratch based on the client’s idea, that may not always be the case, but since the motivation and inspiration behind the tattoo come from the client… one can’t be deemed more important. The artist has to have a canvas of some sort or else the art is only thoughts and dreams in his or her mind.
I think I would safely say that tattooing was one of the first interactive artforms. That gets kind of tricky though because I know that scientist have found mummies with “tattoos”. These marks were believed to be more like acupuncture due to the fact they were in pressure point areas and they consisted of simple lines. I guess it depends on if you consider All tattoos forms of art. Tattoos are permanent marks left by dye and inks but scarring can also be a type of permanent body art where as not all scars are considered to be beautiful or artistic in any way.
How would I describe the unique relationship between tattoo artist and the person being tattooed? Well there is a love of ink between the two. I think it’s a very personal type of relationship because you have to put faith into a stranger’s hand (in most cases). Especially if this tattoo means something extremely important to the tattooed person like commemorating the loss of a loved one or to mark a life altering event. I have known people that get tattoos simply to have one but as a whole, it is a permanent personal statement to everyone, every tattoo has a reason and a special meaning and as an artist I would be honored to make idea or feeling have a face and shape. I would feel honored to use my abilities to give a client that tribute to whatever it is that they want to share with the world. As a client I come to the artist with respect for the artist’s work and with the willingness to be a walking canvas. As the artist I am grateful to use my talent on an appreciative stranger.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

red-invisible In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:23:39 +0000 UTC]

Like all art it depends on the person creating and viewing the piece. To the first question, both are the most important. with an artist there is no art, and visvursa with out material to use the is no art. Both are eccential to the piece. I do not believe this was the first form of interactive art mainly because i believe song and dance to be seeing i view both as arts and pieces in themselves. And Lastly I restate my first answer. It all depends on the peoplesome Tattoo artist lack passion and vision to be "artist" and do it for money and then there's the drunks who ruin the art of tattoo by just being plain dumb. Thanks to anyone who reads this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NicholsOriginals In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:19:07 +0000 UTC]

I believe that the one becoming the living canvas is more important in the story behind the tattoo, because they are the one that is living the memory of the event that led them to get the tattoo in the first place, its far more personal for them, than it would be for the artist, i would argue that tattooing may have been the first interactive artform... or maybe dance??? perhaps they came about in the same period of self expresion? food for thought. Having several tattoos myself, i can say first hand that I have a profound appreciation to what tattoo artists do and i believe that with their ability to interpret your ideas into tangible masterpieces makes the relationship one of the most unique on the planet

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZeeInKooo In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:05:40 +0000 UTC]

well i have to say one thing that... tattoo art work is awsome... and i really appreciate it...

as tattoo could be something which you personally want to convey to others ya views or anything ....ahh...

neway tattoo is an awsome form of art...
i it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ZaliasoO In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 05:02:14 +0000 UTC]

I approve!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MutedDreams In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 04:41:36 +0000 UTC]

1. Which author is more important in the tattooing of the body - the tattoo artists or the one to become the living canvas?
Honestly, in the essence of interactive art, neither author can be more important an the other. Even if the tattoo is just a inch big, both authors have a vested interest in it. The artists, because he's creating a work that will literally last a lifetime -- and the canvas, because he/she usually has a specific reason for getting the tattoo and will proceed to wear it for that lifetime. If the tattoo is more than just a spur of the moment decision, you will remember exactly where and when you got it and who did it. You will remember each other because of that tattoo.

2. Do you consider tattoo art to be the first “interactive” artform?
I consider it AN interactive artform. I don't think I'm well versed enough to know if it's the "first". You'd also have to define the parameters on what makes art interactive. Is it the fact that you can touch it, hold it, manipulate it? I think a better wording would be that tattooing can be considered to be the "ultimate" interactive artform -- because you will ALWAYS will be "touching, holding, and manipulating it".

3. How would you describe the unique relationship between tattoo artist and the person being tattooed?
Personal. There's really no way around it. Even if it's a simple tattoo, like words or a tribal, the communication that goes into creating the tattoo is unavoidable. It is then inevitably following by the usual question of "why?" That fact that you are letting someone permanently mark you skin, the one of first things use you use to judge/assess a new person (even if its subconsciously), also cannot be overlooked. There HAS to be an element of trust there. Otherwise, what stops you from worrying that he/she isn't permanently branding you with a striking likeness of his/she family jewels? So yeah, tattooing is the one time you should always take it personally.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rednex99 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 04:14:53 +0000 UTC]

1) as far as who is more important, I feel they have the same amount of importance. the artist has the part of starting the vision to come to reality, the one getting the tattoo is just the one with the initial vision of the art.
2) I do consider this to be the first interactive art form do to all the thought and care needed to accomplish the final design. I have been on both sides of the art getting process, the careless non-thought off the wall tatoo and the put alot of heart and desire into the choice of artwork. no matter what happens in the life of the reciever of the tattoo they will always be bound to the exact moment they decided to get it. Yes a tattoo can be removed but the memory of the experience will always be with the person. so no matter why the tattoo was gotten, there will always be a physical memory of the day. I am proud to say I have 7 tatts and plan on more soon. I have a simple rose and cross on my arm ( off the wall of the shop) and various other ones i have come up with. Some from designs and artist off this very site. I will probably keep getting them as long as I can physically get them.
3) I have a very odd bond with all the tattoo artists that have done work on me. I will always remember them as friends. I have only had 3 tattoo artists do work on me. the experience i recieved from each of them will always be engrained in my memory. they are almost like sexual partners in a way but with out the sex. they bring a different type of pleasure that is symbolized by the finished works. And like sexual partners, you will always have a spot for them in your memory. I am a very dedicated reciever of tattoo art. I trust my artist with my very skin and vision of what I want. I have one of the 3 that i would be willing to help as a true friend if he needed it. I know about his past and his family, he knows about my past and family but we share a bond that very few other humans share with me. He has given my a piece of my life that I can always look back on. I will never forget the story behind my tattoos, because I have a constant reminder everytime i look at them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkgreenviper691 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:42:55 +0000 UTC]

deviantART muro drawing

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jballerina In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:39:13 +0000 UTC]

Those questions are perfect for your article! I am excited to read it if you post it here!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Darkgreenviper691 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:37:41 +0000 UTC]

I believe that the living canvas is the impotent part of tattooing because they will forever carry this art.
Yes tattooing is an interactive art form because some tattoos are touching and special to the person getting them. there are even some to tell a story for the person and have a deep meaning.
Depending on the tattoo you can become very close to your tattoo artist also to have someone with a needle with ink on the end there has to be some line of trust to allow yourself so open.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Joethepirate In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:32:52 +0000 UTC]

I believe that both artist and "living canvass" are important in the tattooing of the body. The recipient of the art has obviously been tossing around the idea of making their body their own piece of art and the artist helps project that art onto them (whether it be an original idea from the person receiving the art or the artists existing collection).

Yes tattooing is the first interactive art form What other art form allows you to customize your body and show off that very art wherever you go? Its also a very interactive art form within the culture because almost every tattoo decision has some kind of story behind it and its awesome to hear those stories when comparing ink

The bond between an artist and the person being tattooed is obviously very strong because the tattooed are first of all allowing the artist to decorate their skin. Second, the person being tattooed is like a walking art gallery for said artist. Once the ink is done, the one carrying the art will forever have a tie to the man or woman that gave it to them, creating a relationship especially with the regulars

I would have to agree with JoshKanawite though... some people do get inked for the hell of it with little or no thought put into it. My examples obviously exclude those people. I love the ink that has meaning to someone and to hear what each and every little part of their sleeves mean

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissWickedCreationz In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:24:53 +0000 UTC]

i think the one becoming the canvas is important because they are walking around as a living canvas expressing there personality and telling a story with there body. and yes i do consider tattooing to be the first interactive artform The realationship between the artisy and the person being tattooed has to be close because the artist has got to understand what the person wants and has to understand the story behind it. so there has to be understanding between them so its got to be a mutal one

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KateBloomfield In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:22:17 +0000 UTC]

As someone with many tattoos i think it is very important to find a tattooist who is like-minded, and who you can trust. It's hard trying to convey your artistic message to someone who may not understand where youre coming from, or why you're getting it. If you design your own tattoo, its important your tattooist understands it.

I believe in meanings behind tattoo's, and all of mine have a story. It's nice when people stop you to look at the art on your body, and they ask you what it means.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DClarkeSmith In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 03:03:29 +0000 UTC]

For me my tattoos are a collaboration between the artist and myself,as I have an idea and he works with me to make it as possible as he can.

Tattoo must be as old as clay tablets,tribal tattoos and rite of passage markings are still part of several cultures today, somewhat modernized they play an important part still.

My relationship with the artist I use is probably 90% trust and the rest a mutual liking of the art and style he works in.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

annamae411 In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 02:52:31 +0000 UTC]

As to the first question; They are both important; the canvas for wanting a permanent art statement in the first place, and the artist for bringing the tatto to life, literaly.
It could be the first, but then the cave paintings could as well, the paintings told stories, as all art does. In that line of thinking, all art is interactive, especially when admirers discuss the piece.
Many times the artist is curious about why the canvas chooses the tatoo that they have asked for, communication between the two is very intense, especially because many of the canvases have very good reasons for the tatoo. I'd say that it is briefly intimate.
.
I fully intend to acuire tatoos, the first of which I have designed myself. I've often been told by others that if I ever get a tatoo, I'd better have a good reason for getting it, and get one that I wont regret later in life. It is for this very reason that I have decided to only get ones that have VERY good reasons. My first being the diabetic alert symbol, but far more... intricate than most, and, if I do say so myself, way better looking. I will be getting that on my 18th year, because I am a diabetic. Any and all others that I get will most likely have to do with my heritage, my life, my aspirations, my dreams,... or whatever is important to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Junocis In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 02:51:57 +0000 UTC]

each question will be answered respectively:
1ertaining to this one, it is circumstantial. Some people who become the canvas use designs that they thought were neat or awesome that they saw created by the artist. In this situation, the artist would be more important because they will not only create something that they like, but also something that will catch the eye of an observer who would be willing to have it placed on their body for the rest of their life.

On the other hand, some people get tattoos that they themselves have designed, but, do to lack of skill and/or the human body, cannot place the tattoo on themselves. In this instance, the canvas would be the important author for this is something that they feel has deep meaning to them and is tied into certain memories and the like. I fall under this category.

2. As the first interactive art form, I would have to say no. But then again, perhaps my definition of interactive may be different from the one the writer is speaking on. In my mind, when I think interactive art form, I think of an art that changes based on the viewer's input with the art, like video games that allow you to create a custom avatar to your liking.

3.Well there has to be some level of trust between the canvas and the artist. Hopefully the person extensively checked out the tattooist before deciding to put themselves under the needle. To voluntarily let someone inflict pain and permanent scarring upon your person and then pay them for it the trust in their skill and craft has to be there, especially if your commission has them putting their hands in private places upon your body.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NotActiveAnyMore In reply to ??? [2011-08-05 02:43:48 +0000 UTC]

1: the tattoo artist, he/she is the one making the everlasting art on your skin, better be good at it!

2:yes, but cave painting was prolly more "artsy", tattoos were prolly just symbols that ment things(like im from this tribe, and im a good hunter-kinda thing), not a painting of a herd of horses being chased by smily-dons.

3:eh, not really, unless u get a lot of tattoos , then you guys might become friends?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0