HOME | DD

hyolark β€” Rainbow Dash on Cloud

Published: 2014-07-28 14:52:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 3663; Favourites: 73; Downloads: 51
Redirect to original
Description RD version
Much better
SFW?:Link
Related content
Comments: 32

MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 04:38:30 +0000 UTC]

You know, I enjoyed your work right up until this point. Like, was this necessary to draw?
Have you SEEN the comments?
Not that I don't like the art itself, it's great, but I just have an aversion against suggestive, sexual, and pornographic pony pictures.
Sorry if this has an effect on my opinion of this work.
And... (Looks in comments)... try not to attract the wrong audience.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 04:39:26 +0000 UTC]

And was a "nude" version really necessary?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ElementOf-Loyalty [2014-12-12 16:37:59 +0000 UTC]

-BEHOLD THE GLORY OF THE DASH PLOT!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 04:26:51 +0000 UTC]

Whoa! Are you okay?
I think you have problems.
I don't mind if you... get hard... on certain things, but...
...I just have an aversion to pony porn, or suggestive pony pictures.
But shouldn't you at least keep it secret?
Also, WHAT IS WITH YOUR PICTURE!?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:32:30 +0000 UTC]

"Nope".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 05:35:31 +0000 UTC]

You are disturbing. I hope you're not going to be one of those annoying people, like that YouTube user named Princess Molestia, who just pesters you continuously just to prove a point.
Although the odds that you aren't are kinda slim, so...
Come at me, bro.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:36:28 +0000 UTC]

"I said Nope".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 05:37:58 +0000 UTC]

"Nope" about what?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:42:32 +0000 UTC]

You don't know?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 23:05:40 +0000 UTC]

What a closet case you are, multiperson 3141.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 05:43:03 +0000 UTC]

No, that's... why I aked.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:45:53 +0000 UTC]

Guess you'll never know.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 05:47:43 +0000 UTC]

...
That may be the case, but I'd like to know.
Or maybe I already know what your talking about and wasting your time.

And... this isn't the best way to prove a point.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:50:06 +0000 UTC]

You don't need to know.

Β  Β  Β "Don't want karma then don't engage karma".

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 05:52:14 +0000 UTC]

Who said arguing was a karma?
Believe it or not, I enjoy arguing because I like proving people wrong.
So... not exactly the best counter-example.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ElementOf-Loyalty In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 05:58:47 +0000 UTC]



Mature Content

Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to ElementOf-Loyalty [2015-08-29 06:01:19 +0000 UTC]

Whoa, WTF!?
Why!? What is the point of showing that!?
That's not an argument, that's a nuisance!
And... back on topic!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Culu-Bluebeaver [2014-11-13 12:18:05 +0000 UTC]

Oh O.O ... Um... That's hot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to Culu-Bluebeaver [2015-08-29 04:35:29 +0000 UTC]

No. No, it's not.
Russel.
At least, I think it it. I haven't watched HTF in ages.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Culu-Bluebeaver In reply to MultiPerson3141 [2015-08-29 13:26:19 +0000 UTC]

Okay, if you say so.

Oh that's not Russel. That's my own HTF-character, the blue beaver.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to Culu-Bluebeaver [2015-08-29 14:09:51 +0000 UTC]

Oh, cool.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Chatterbeast [2014-09-29 10:34:19 +0000 UTC]

κ·Έ μ „λ¦¬ν’ˆ 을 μ‚¬λž‘ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€.*
(*Translation: Loving that booty.)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FanaticTVzombie [2014-08-29 01:06:35 +0000 UTC]

Rrrrrrrrright.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

asdf314159265 [2014-08-02 07:39:20 +0000 UTC]

이 λΆ„ 갈수둝(...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

MultiPerson3141 In reply to asdf314159265 [2015-08-29 04:32:21 +0000 UTC]

It gets two minutes...
What is that supposed to mean?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sophillia [2014-07-30 01:33:42 +0000 UTC]

Hiya,
no offense but i believe a mature tag is needed here for "sexual themes". Thanks

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

MultiPerson3141 In reply to Sophillia [2015-08-29 04:33:01 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but it's suggestive, not sexual, not unless you find it arousing. Which I hope you don't.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

FanaticTVzombie In reply to Sophillia [2014-12-28 01:29:07 +0000 UTC]

Nothing here is sexual though?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

leewoojin900 [2014-07-29 04:00:09 +0000 UTC]

흠 νƒ±νƒ±ν•˜κ΅°μš”

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

E-guardias [2014-07-28 23:08:12 +0000 UTC]

Hey i don't mean to offend you or anything, this is just a minor suggestion, but have you considered using another painting software. like me, i use Adobe Flash CS5. Again this is just a minor suggestion, i just thought that you should make something awesome even more awesome.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Kioko-the-Pirate In reply to E-guardias [2014-07-29 01:16:46 +0000 UTC]

I think he's fine using what he uses now. It gives his art a style that stands out against a lot of other artists. Simple as it may be, it works.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RillaKim [2014-07-28 15:14:29 +0000 UTC]

쑰금만 λ‚΄λ €μ£Όμ§€....μΉ―

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0