HOME | DD

IgorKutuzov — ST-1061 Bliznetsy

Published: 2010-06-16 12:58:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 5347; Favourites: 63; Downloads: 101
Redirect to original
Description (based on gundam type-61 tank)

the ST-1061 (srazhenie tank Russian: сражение танк or "Battle tank") it's a heavy battle tank created to replace in the 2048 the MBT-982 Manticore II...
the ST-1061 armed with two massive Rheinmetall-KHI 175mm EM cannons the binated cannons of this unit are so well known that it's called Bliznetsy that means twins in russian...
the hull of the unit it's a cooperation of Krauss-Maffei, KHI and General Dynamics Land Systems all the 3 industried brought the best they can to create the most leathal heavy battle tank that human technology was able to create in the 2048...
Related content
Comments: 50

spydigger [2011-04-23 17:21:42 +0000 UTC]

this makes me want to say "you feeling lucky punk?"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to spydigger [2011-04-24 23:20:47 +0000 UTC]

if i don't hit ya with the first shot i always have another one...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

spydigger In reply to IgorKutuzov [2011-04-25 13:38:20 +0000 UTC]

lol yeah

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to spydigger [2011-04-25 18:40:21 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fatty119 [2010-06-25 18:36:40 +0000 UTC]

That is mad awesome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to fatty119 [2010-06-25 18:42:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks comrade... i'm asking you to give me a black and white .PNG image of your Millemoto car...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fatty119 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-26 19:18:11 +0000 UTC]

how do i do that?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to fatty119 [2010-06-26 19:35:27 +0000 UTC]

nevermind i have alreday done that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

madcomm [2010-06-17 09:05:39 +0000 UTC]

Minor differences, but big effected combat wise.
This is a good job, but you may want to make a light, fast version, the standard one (This one) and a really heavy one.
Just an idea.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to madcomm [2010-06-17 09:12:54 +0000 UTC]

you mean based on this hull or completly new tanks ?
anyway glad that you like the tank buddy !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomm In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 12:27:28 +0000 UTC]

I mean on this hull. Just a Light varriant, the normal variant (This one) and a heavier, more armored, more guns-ed varriant.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to madcomm [2010-06-17 12:57:37 +0000 UTC]

more guns than a twin barrel 175mm cannons ? o.O

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomm In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 13:37:38 +0000 UTC]

Yeah......
We at Madjemascorp enjoy fast reloading, very heavy and very fast weaponary. We also like indirect striking weapons.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to madcomm [2010-06-17 16:19:38 +0000 UTC]

the best of the best huh ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomm In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 16:25:29 +0000 UTC]

Nope actually.
Madjemascorp is from the halcyon race, which enjoys an insane firepower. However, due to their slow reproduction rate, even though they live for centuries.....
>.> well let's just say tehere are not many of them.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to madcomm [2010-06-17 19:15:12 +0000 UTC]

i see...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

madcomm In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 22:00:53 +0000 UTC]

I see.......WHALES! FAIL WHALES! ZOMGWTFBBQ IT RHYMES!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkProxy [2010-06-16 19:27:42 +0000 UTC]

it looks like a type 61tank from the gundom series

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to DarkProxy [2010-06-16 19:32:24 +0000 UTC]

yes it's based on that tank...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hellraisermon [2010-06-16 18:36:15 +0000 UTC]

That's a cool looking tank and 2 cannons? Awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Hellraisermon [2010-06-16 18:42:32 +0000 UTC]

hell yeah ! ready to cripple any foe !

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VoughtVindicator [2010-06-16 18:15:33 +0000 UTC]

Eh, two cannons are only useful if you're talking mortars or old naval guns.

And the driver's seat windows are enormous. That's a pretty big weak spot...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to VoughtVindicator [2010-06-16 18:39:38 +0000 UTC]

ah C'mon anyone want tanks with twin cannons !
and i have corrected the driver seat huge windows problem...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 18:51:54 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, but wanting and knowing what that implies are two different things.

With two cannons, assuming that both have autoloaders, you won't be able to carry a lot of ammunition and the turret will be cramped as hell.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to VoughtVindicator [2010-06-16 18:59:21 +0000 UTC]

infact in the turret there is only the tank comander the gunner is in the hull right behind the pilot...
and yes they have autoloaders both...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VoughtVindicator In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 19:07:34 +0000 UTC]

That would both decrease survivability and reduce the reliability of the whole weapons syetsm, given that the gunner can only see outwards with the use of an electronic gunsight with no optical backup (unless you have a hugeass set of mirrors that would likely not work in practice), and both the driver and the gunner are pretty spaced out from the commander. Putting the gunner behind the driver would screw up the turret mechanism, given that behind the driver is usually where the turret ring goes.

And it would solve nearly nothing, given that you have to make room for those enormous munitions (a problem the AMOS doesn't have), two autoloaders, armor, targeting computers, recoil space for two guns and room for the commander AND for the gunner to leave the tank fast if it gets mobility-killed all in the turret.

That, and only one hatch reduces visibility when the crew is unbuttoned. This also lacks some of the features of any common tank, such as a coaxial, a commander machinegun.

It's also pretty damn tall proportionately, so tanks in hull-down position would get a shot at it pretty easily, and it would turn over if it turned tightly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Weasel102 [2010-06-16 16:07:07 +0000 UTC]

Jesus Christ that's a big cannon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Weasel102 [2010-06-16 17:30:18 +0000 UTC]

they are actually 2...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Weasel102 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 18:11:50 +0000 UTC]

*GASP*

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Weasel102 [2010-06-16 18:34:05 +0000 UTC]

take a look now...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Weasel102 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 19:22:51 +0000 UTC]

Holy...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Weasel102 [2010-06-16 19:24:20 +0000 UTC]

he he twin barrel firepower...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Weasel102 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 01:19:01 +0000 UTC]

Say hallo to my little friends...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Weasel102 [2010-06-17 09:07:20 +0000 UTC]

heavy guns FTW ! =3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Weasel102 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-17 10:40:13 +0000 UTC]

BOOM!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 14:24:22 +0000 UTC]

I WANT THE SAME IN RED. Urban camo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 14:35:39 +0000 UTC]

urban camo is black grey and white... there is no red in the urban camo...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 14:37:12 +0000 UTC]

Err, no. You're talking about digital camo... ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 14:48:25 +0000 UTC]

this is the URBAN CAMO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 14:53:29 +0000 UTC]

so, WHAT IS THAT ? [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 15:07:31 +0000 UTC]

THAT is the urban camo for the guys of modern warfare or stuff like that... the real urban it's the one i shown you... why you need red to camouglage in a city that is mainly grey ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 15:16:57 +0000 UTC]

I dunno... But I found this on GOOGLE. So what's the name of this camo ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 15:22:19 +0000 UTC]

i don't know... it's not an official camo the only game i know whit that camo is raimbow six Vegas 2... in that game is called "crimson"

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 15:23:52 +0000 UTC]

Sooo, I want a tank with a crimson camo. <333

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 18:46:48 +0000 UTC]

i see what i can do...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 19:07:27 +0000 UTC]

Thank yoooou x3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 19:14:08 +0000 UTC]

i tried... bad news... look ugly...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 19:29:11 +0000 UTC]

Just can't be xD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

IgorKutuzov In reply to Diabolo48 [2010-06-16 19:42:17 +0000 UTC]

T^T

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Diabolo48 In reply to IgorKutuzov [2010-06-16 19:48:21 +0000 UTC]

Eeeh, nooo ^^"

👍: 0 ⏩: 0