HOME | DD
Inspector97 β Pocahontas
Published: 2018-01-19 23:15:26 +0000 UTC; Views: 7750; Favourites: 444; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Well someone flagged the other version....thanks by the way.... and just in case you think you are so much smarter then me, here... practice some readingΒ disney.wikia.com/wiki/Pocahontβ¦Related content
Comments: 110
π: 0 β©: 1
What other version? Where can I see it?
π: 0 β©: 1
You can't. It was removed from here and I don't have another gallery
π: 0 β©: 1
Don't risk it. I'd hate to lose your work here.
There are some morons who can't seem to find the adult filter. They seem very active around images of Disney princesses (they got to me too).
As far as I know only Aurora has her age given, and as most are married at the end of the movie, an age of adulthood can be expected.
I weep for todays teenagers. All they can look at these days is women old enough to be their mothers.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well according to the Disney Wiki, Pocahontas is 18... and other princess' are as followsΒ img.buzzfeed.com/buzzfeed-statβ¦
π: 0 β©: 1
Proving my theory that Disney endorses/promotes teenage marriage.
Seriously though, some people need a crash course in use of the DA adult filter, and/or need to learn to step up to their wives/moms when caught watching nude pictures, and NOT blame the artist.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah... I was shamed by someone who didn't know the Disney facts...just the historical ones
π: 0 β©: 0
It's a shame what happened, but Pocahontas still looks plenty beautiful in this version.Β Although, why did you have to lose the background as well?
π: 0 β©: 1
Just didn't feel the need to give this piece much more.... it was a statement more then art for me
π: 0 β©: 0
honestly she's always looked at least 18 to me xDΒ
(sexiest disney lady imho :3)
btw beautiful pic
π: 0 β©: 1
That is just a damn shame cause I faved the original, and was surprised when I got back to see that it had been changed. The original was so beautiful, and I was just heartbroken to see that it was changed to appeal to some SJW. Man, we shouldn't have to change art because one SJW was offended. Any chance where we can see the original?
π: 0 β©: 1
I put it on my blogspot.... I can'y provide a link as that breaks DA rules to
π: 0 β©: 2
Put the link to your blog in the DeviantID section of your profile. DA doesn't want direct links to 'porn' art, but the blog link is an indirect link, so it's okay.
π: 0 β©: 1
As the blog has all the rejects from here... that would still break the rules. A quick google search should find it
π: 0 β©: 1
It was hard to find the blog. It's not on Google, and I had to turn off SafeSearch to find it with the other search engine.
π: 0 β©: 1
Others say it was easy.... but what do I know.... I have a quick link to it cuz it's mine
π: 0 β©: 0
I'll try and google it... So far, no other success unless you don't use the Inspector97 username there and go by another name.
π: 0 β©: 1
I use the same name.
π: 0 β©: 1
Found it! Now I can behold the original piece!
π: 0 β©: 1
And a few others that were ousted from DA
π: 0 β©: 0
Well that's not fair. She was 18-19 in the movie. And this version of Pocahontas is just fictional. They might as well go to war on Esmeralda pin-ups since she's 16 in the novels, even though in the movie she's over 20.
Still looks lovely in your style.
π: 0 β©: 1
What? Damn, and I didn't get to see the other version.
π: 0 β©: 0
Oh, for fuck's sake on the flagging... *Headdesk* The previous one, and this one, both sexy.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah...thanks :/
π: 0 β©: 0
Somewhere, the flagger and DA staff are listening to the Imperial March.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
If you only knew the power of the Dark Side!Β
π: 0 β©: 1
I am one with the force and the force is with me.
π: 0 β©: 0
I didn't destroy it if that's what you mean
π: 0 β©: 1
could you send the original to me?
π: 0 β©: 1
I can. Postage and packing n stuff
π: 0 β©: 1
just send it through notes
π: 0 β©: 1
I can't do that unless it's in my gallery
π: 0 β©: 2
Put it in your stash
π: 0 β©: 1
Use it then
I think the stuff you put in your stash doesn't get deleted
π: 0 β©: 1
There is a DA rule about linking to inappropriate material... plus I don't care to use stash
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>