HOME | DD

Published: 2010-04-03 04:21:44 +0000 UTC; Views: 1244; Favourites: 16; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
The story behind this image:I was doing my usual 75 mph on this 55 mph limit country road where the only sign of a cop is where one lives and doesn't seem to work. I came around one of my favorite turns where I enjoy seeing a long line of hoppers on a dirt road between two vast fields so wide I once saw two separate storms beyond the trees across the fields. The sight often cheers me up as I travel between the two schools I teach at. Just after I left the turn, I saw smoke billowing out from the base of this burnt leafless tree. My eyes were fixated on this until I realized I was about to run into someone who actually obeys the speed limit out there. I passed him, turned around, and parked in the field to get the photo.
Imagine the scene. I'm in black slacks, a white button down shirt, and a tie. I'm driving a nice SUV and using a big medium format camera to photograph what is apparently a burning tire at the base of the tree. Just as I finish muddying up my dress boots climbing a mud levee to get the shot, a truck blocks my exit from the field and waits for me to trek back across the field to my vehicle. I greeted him and explained how the tree caught my attention and I couldn't help but stop to photograph it. I also asked if he was the property owner because I wanted to tell him how much I enjoy passing his fields with the hoppers on the road. He replied, "Nah, I ain't the owner, but he's on his way there," and pointed to a truck coming down the road that parked blocking the two of us in the field. As he steps out, he recognizes me from a gallery I held at a local civic center, explains that he also knows my parents, and whipped out his camera to show me his own photographs.
The first fella realized the coast was clear and tells his side of the story. The workers operating farm equipment in a nearby field saw me, the cleaned up suit with a big camera, photographing his burning tire and called him up. They told him "there's an EPA man photographing that tire you burned" to which he replied, "I don't know what you're talking about," and hung up.
The property owner's best advice to me that day was "Neva get gov'ment plates or you'll get shot 'round here."
Photographed with my beautiful Mamiya RZ67 Pro II with a 110mm lens on T-Max 400 speed film and printed on Ilford silver gelatin paper at 8x10 inches then scanned for digital archiving. I did my best to clear the dust from the scan. This was the first time I got to use a holder with a big enough frame to allow the black lines from the clear part of the film around the image. I love the result.
Related content
Comments: 22
SteveMcClelland [2011-07-21 10:38:27 +0000 UTC]
LOL on the Gov. Plates remark (its true!)! I have 4 tires saved for just this purpose as soon as this Texas drought is over!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to SteveMcClelland [2011-07-22 05:51:01 +0000 UTC]
Do something interesting instead. Make art out of it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SteveMcClelland In reply to JaredPLNormand [2011-07-22 10:22:25 +0000 UTC]
No, as the wife says the brush piles keeping getting higher and wider! lol 300+ days of drought conditions so far here
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pamplemousseyeux [2010-06-14 04:10:12 +0000 UTC]
this is beautiful! I love the border effect... I'm setting up a dark room partly to try and get that old school black border!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to pamplemousseyeux [2010-06-14 11:27:52 +0000 UTC]
I saw one photographer shoot digital then add the border digitally to look like film. I thought it was quite pathetic because it always looked exactly the same in each image. I love the black boarder but some negative carriers don't allow it and crop into the photograph a little too much. Beseler's 35mm carriers usually allow the edge. Just make sure you can buy the right carriers to allow the boarder.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
pamplemousseyeux In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-06-15 04:00:30 +0000 UTC]
yeah, I totally agree- the digital borders are super cheesy.... nothing matches up to a good job in the darkroom!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to pamplemousseyeux [2010-06-15 11:22:32 +0000 UTC]
What also annoys me though is a sloppily executed analogue boarder. I'm very specific so I make all my photographs the same size and often use the easel to crop into the black boarder to keep a neat edge on at least three sides and leave a larger white band across the fourth. It ends up looking like a Polaroid shot and I get to use that larger bottom boarder as a handle on the print for moving it from tray to tray and there after. It also reflects the proper photo matte which is larger on the bottom than the top.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
katshadow [2010-05-19 11:36:11 +0000 UTC]
That is hilarious and sounds like something that would happen around here. but it is a very nice shot it came out great.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to katshadow [2010-05-20 11:25:49 +0000 UTC]
I'm glad you think so. I was worried about the smoke showing up. The tree is gone now, but I'm glad I finally got a shot of a tree in a field because they are so interesting in their form, especially during the bare winter. I have a new idea that I may post soon when I start shooting it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
katshadow In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-05-20 15:20:18 +0000 UTC]
Yeah I hear ya they got this one little tree growing out of the middle of the bayou that Ive always wanted to take a picture of I probably should soon before it disappears, But I will keep an eye out for that idea. I was wondering though do you use darkroom printing alot I have never got a chance but the technique really sees fascinating
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to katshadow [2010-05-21 02:25:15 +0000 UTC]
It's the only way I like to make art. I restored a darkroom at one of my schools and use it as often as my schedule allows. Sometimes I'll go back to my alma mater and work in their lab for a day. It's expensive in the long run but the quality is superb and digital can't touch that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
katshadow In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-05-21 20:21:40 +0000 UTC]
I would just love to have that kind of know how ya know. I am still learning how to use digital, but I think learning darkroom techniques would be so much better. Like learning auto mechanics as opposed to bringing your car to the shop kinda thing. Your pictures definitely show experience though kee up the good shooting!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to katshadow [2010-05-21 21:54:27 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, try finding a local darkroom and the money to get started. It takes some practice to get proficient but it's very rewarding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
katshadow In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-05-22 11:41:50 +0000 UTC]
Mmm Thanks for the advice. Just one more thing where do you suggest I start looking ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to katshadow [2010-05-22 19:31:58 +0000 UTC]
Depends on how near you are to how big a city. My closest public darkroom was New Orleans but they closed their chemical lab and are now just digital (sadness). Now it may be Houston which is way out of my range. I suggest trying your nearest university if they have a lab. Talk to the professor's there about classes, volunteering in the lab, paying usage fees, etc. There are those who want to work in traditional media but are discouraged due to the dismal market and dominance of digital. For lab equipment: freestylephoto.biz and bhphotovideo.com.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
katshadow In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-05-23 01:43:31 +0000 UTC]
Awesome thanks a lot I will actually be starting college son so I will check it out. I know they have photography classes so hopefully they will have a darkroom, but first though I have to get the right kinda camera. Thanks again for all the help!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
JaredPLNormand In reply to katshadow [2010-05-23 15:11:15 +0000 UTC]
Pentax K1000 or Canon AE-1. I have both and love the Pentax more. You can do everything with either of them. They're simple and stripped down to the basic and practically undestructable system. You should be able to find either for about $100. You might be able to find them for as low as $50. Additional lenses will run in that range as well. Stick to lenses made by the company (Pentax or Canon respectively) but stay away from zoom lenses because they had not figured out how to keep the quality of a prime lens yet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
katshadow In reply to JaredPLNormand [2010-05-23 23:33:58 +0000 UTC]
Wow that's a lot cheaper than I was thinking.I think I have actually heard of the Canon before. I will definitely keep an eye out for those though,and I seriously appreciate it man. Thanks Your advice will not be a waste!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JaredPLNormand In reply to alizee13 [2010-04-05 02:47:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much. It was a challenge to print but I love working in the darkroom.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
11th-deathgod [2010-04-03 04:23:43 +0000 UTC]
I love this. Amazing contrast and composition.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1