HOME | DD
jimmah93 β FMA Alignment
Published: 2010-05-19 14:03:09 +0000 UTC; Views: 19426; Favourites: 245; Downloads: 2965
Redirect to original
Description
I think the characters pretty much fill these roles, except for maybe May Chang.... True Neutral's always a hard one to define.Related content
Comments: 43
Yep. This is good.
(I notice a lot of people are saying that Kimbley is actually neutral evil. Personally, I disagree -- anyone notice he's COMPLETELY INSANE?)
π: 0 β©: 1
Being insane doesn't really change much. You can have a good guy who's fuckin nuts or a completely sane person who's evil
π: 0 β©: 1
Excuse my poor word choice. Perhaps "psychopath" might be better. He doesn't care for laws or his boss. The only morality he has is based off of his own arbitrary conclusions. He's willing to do whatever it takes to get a job done, no matter what it costs him. I'd call that chaotic.
π: 0 β©: 0
I think that Kimblee would make a better neutral evil since he does have his own twisted sense of morality.
π: 0 β©: 1
Even Chaotic Evil character have some values. For example the Major in Hellsing does place high value in discipline, courage and efficiency. Satanβs (as depicted in paradise lost) morality revolves around never obeying anyone. Ash from Black Butler has a twisted since of morality revolving around purity and corruption. The Joker in The Dark Knight similar to Kimblee despises hypocrisy. The list goes on.......
π: 0 β©: 0
Actually Kimblee wouldn't be Chaotic Evil. He doesn't really fit here due to his unique sense of morality. Within the confines of his morality, he would be lawful neutral.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
NOW D&D makes sense XD THANKS a ton for sharing this
π: 0 β©: 0
First of all King Bradley Wrath is not Lawful Evil. Sure he's the Fuhrer, upholding an evil system (the government in Amestris) to limit people's individual freedoms and because he supposedly thinks the law should be followed at all costs. People tend to confuse Wrath/Bradley's rhetoric with the truth. But, from what I've seen, Bradley doesn't believe in the law or systems. Lets not forget that he's a double agent for Father, whose organization is not really a system. Father's a glob with an eye and a mouth wanting to absorb all the knowledge in the world and sends his children to make the humans do his bidding. further more Bradley doesn't believe in name, rank, race, sex, or personal history. He's been wanting his entire life to just fight and kill for its own sake. And he loves his wife. So fighting and love are the only things he believes in. Bradley sounds more like Chaotic Evil to me or maybe Natural Evil at beast but not Lawful Evil. But to be fair Pride Bradley is more the lawful evil type.
the first anime's version of Solf J. Kimblee was a Psycho for Hire, Nietzsche Wannabe, and Misanthrope Supreme par excellence, who Loves the Sound of Screaming and isn't afraid to share it with you and was completely Chaotic Evil. But his manga counterpart is not much so and is more Neutral Evil. He chooses to keep the Philosopher's Stone the military lend him to test it out, killing the people who know he has it. His loyalty to the homunculi is questionable at best, given that his primary motivation is to see whether they or humanity survive. In the end, he betrays Pride when the latter hypocritically goes against his idea that homunculi are superior to humans. He personally admits his views are at odds with society, and says that because he knows they are, he's gotten by through pretending to be normal.
A better Example of Chaotic Neutral then Scar is Greed. He rebelled against his creator, the Big Bad, to pursue his own desires (especially immortality). While he is quite selfish, he cares for his friends (albeit because they are in a sense, his possessions).
And Ed veers between Chaotic Good and Neutral Good. Sure He believes in the law of equivalent exchange as the only true law and his loyalty to the government of Amestris questionable at best . But other then that. He gleefully delights in breaking the rules and defies authority when he feels like it, but he also constantly goes out of his way to help people. Creating even more conflict when he actually has to obey orders due to his job. But don't worry I made the same mistake.
And Roy is more Neutral Good he only fallows law that work in his favor.
And some True Neutral Examples are Truth. e has no active involvement in human life, neither rewarding the good or punishing the bad. However, if an alchemist infringes upon the laws of nature and comes before Truth, he upholds the laws of Equivalent Exchange by taking an organ or limb from them (which he does with sadistic glee) but in exchange, they gain the ability to do alchemy without a transmutation circle. Finally, Truth ultimately shows just enough benevolence to not fit any evil alignment. And Yoki, a former Corrupt Bureaucrat. He's not evil, good, lawful, or chaotic just a jerk. Theirs also Sloth who only wants to sleep.
But still a good job.
See my own [link]
π: 0 β©: 1
I would argue Pride/Bradley is just as Chaotic Β or Neutral Evil as Wrath/Bradley. He can even go further than Wrath/Bradley because of his autonomy, and attack non-rebelling Amestrians, trying to provoke the people of Lior to attack first. Just like Wrath/Bradley, it only looks like he believes in law and order. His actual motivations are never revealed, but he's still not lawful evil, that would be more like Frank Archer.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
You could have used The Truth (That guy at the gate when Human Transmutation invoked) for true neutral. That's who I'd choose.
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm either chaotic good or chaotic evil. Either way I'm chaotic.
π: 0 β©: 0
for some reason, when I read the subtitles under Lawful Good...I read it as "I will be plumber someday"
π: 0 β©: 1
I see it too! XD
π: 0 β©: 1
Isn't that weird?
π: 0 β©: 1
So Mustang's goal in life isn't to become Fuhrer but to become the next Super Mario.
π: 0 β©: 1
In that case, he would destroy everybody with Hawkeye (Luigi) by his side
π: 0 β©: 1
XD Poor Hawkeye.
π: 0 β©: 0
If you wanna shoot the leader, first aim for his horse
IF U WANNA SHOOT DA LEADA, SHOOT DA LEADA!!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Awesome, though technically Bradley is Lawful Badass, close enough!
π: 0 β©: 0
I read all the captions and thought, "True sh--."
π: 0 β©: 0
lol i like ling's , he's so happy 'bout it xDD
π: 0 β©: 0
I'm not sure Roy is a good example of Lawful Good - I'd go with Winry.
Roy has too many shadowy business to be considered Lawful - he was plotting a coup d'etat after all.
And I agree with you, True Neutrals are so hard to find >_<
π: 0 β©: 0
"I like explosions, that's all there is to it". XD
π: 0 β©: 0
You should do a picture of Truth for true neutral. Making him saying something like, "Heh heh heh... I have to be this alignment."
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd say Gluttony would be a better True Neutral.
He's almost entirely motivated by his own hunger and is generally too childish to make moral decisions.
π: 0 β©: 0
Chaotic Good! I'm chaotic good! and so is Ling!! YES!! This is a really awesome idea.
π: 0 β©: 0
hughes might be a better true neutral. he is so devoted to his family and objective toward his country.
π: 0 β©: 0
Everything seems pretty good except for May Chang. She inst a true neutral seeing as she fights against the homunculi several times and is on the good guys' side.
π: 0 β©: 0
I think your right about May......Trisha might of been a better bet, her loyalty was to her family and she is dead so she cant take a side to anything....
π: 0 β©: 0
I can't read the little writing what does it say?
π: 0 β©: 1
LG: "I will be furher some day!"
NG: I'm not killing anyone. That's not what I do.
CG: If you want to shoot the leader, first aim for his horse.
LN: Survival of the fittest: that's the Brigg's law.
TN: I must find the secret to immortality!
CG: I am the man who has betrayed the ways of god.
LE: I am the one who rules this country, not you.
NE: I'll be watching...
CE: I like explosions. That's all there is to it.
π: 0 β©: 0