HOME | DD
kevinbolk — Meanwhile in Anime Land...
#aliens #angel #anime #demon #girls #goddess #harem #japanese #magical #manga #parody #robots
Published: 2015-06-09 02:11:16 +0000 UTC; Views: 22757; Favourites: 714; Downloads: 67
Redirect to original
Description
Read MORE "I'm My Own Mascot" here: http://kevinbolk.com/comic/mascotcomic/
Related content
Comments: 131
Is this the bar where Action Girlfriends congregate?
I like how the robot appears to be drinking from a tiny fuel container 
Also, I take it the angelic lady must be enjoying herself a spirit.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
There is no Jojo's Bizarre Adventure Parody...
No anime parody is complete without a parody of Manly Anime...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
there is this
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe7kMl…
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
An anime Parody that doesn't use terrible writing and uses tropes that actually exist? Awesome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That is the best choice. These guys have the least chance to drag you to wacky hijinks. Right?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Three things about the remarks above:
(1). It is true that women look for confidence and strength, but they disagree vehemently on what "strength" and "confidence" actually mean.
This Guy's Quote: "And thou cannot ask a woman what she wants, because she doesn't know, its all subconscious desires."
Incorrect. You could easily ask me what I want, and I can tell you: "The most biologically attractive possible man would have dark long hair, very bright huge eyes, a very thin, non-muscular and wiry body, jaw-dropping levels of arrogance and confidence, considerable wealth, an erudite kind of intelligence, and this weird sense about him that he's powerful enough to have had countless people murdered on his behalf and a greater number than that effectively enslaved. " In other words, the guy looks and acts like he could pass for the Antichrist.
But this isn't the case with my friend, also a woman, who prefers: Muscular, tall, very aloof and in fact indifferent to my friend, personally capable of violent acts rather than ordering others to do them, sharp-witted but not academic or erudite in character, sarcastic and bitter, often the subordinate of a much more toxic person (See the guy above). This guy looks and acts like the bastard child of Farscape's protagonist and Mal from Firefly. Meanwhile my sister wants Christian Jason Bourne, but actually married younger, scientist C.S. Lewis.
In other words, NONE of us want or wanted the same kind of "confidence," but we all knew EXACTLY what we wanted.
Honestly, I think you don't know what women want because you're refusing to listen when it isn't what you'd hope (Or even expect) it'd be.
(2). Very few women would go for the shy awkward guy INITIALLY, but they MAY go for him if his confidence increases during the time they know one another.
The thing about shows like Tenchi Muyo is that it's highly improbable for all of those women to be initially attracted to Tenchi, but HIGHLY probable that they will fall in love with the Tenchi that exists later in the show. It is not impossible for a shy or awkward man to obtain a woman, as long as he is willing to prove that he will do anything to protect those he loves. He becomes beautiful through his nobility, and in that way the harem anime is not entirely wrong.
(3). An attractive woman with an intolerable or even boring personality becomes unattractive VERY quickly, and similarly an average-looking woman with a highly feminine personality becomes attractive.
Attractiveness even with dudes has a lot more to do with how people carry themselves than you'd think. At the peak of my beauty I constantly shifted around in my seat, constantly messed with my eyebrows, had an Aspie's voice, and in pretty much every way was incredibly awkward. I may have been thin and pretty, but I wasn't "feminine." Genetics aren't the only factor involved in somebody's appearance, and for that reason a woman can easily alter how attractive she is.
Or, for that matter, gain such proficiency in an area of mutual interest with her loved one that her passion and strength become attractive to him.
(4). Even with all of the above said straight, personality and personal connections between people still win the day in terms of who you love.
I have only romantically loved three people in my lifetime, and two of them were women. All three are as different from one another as chalk and cheese, and one of them is an anxious wreck. Another is overweight. We do have our animal instincts, but we're more than animals. We are drawn to those who make us feel better for being around them, and for knowing them.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I actually read a book once where the main charcter had to go find what every woman wanted. In the end in the story, it turned out what every woman wanted was her own way xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anime male characters that aren't A) boring as tar or B) Huge dickwads are pretty rare.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
All of the One Piece crew men ?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
And this is what is known as a losers fantasy.
As prominent as this troop is in Japan it is reasonable to assume that most Japanese males or a large percentage of these males that read mangas, are losers.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
So what about Jojo's Bizarre Adventure manga?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
don't know this one, please summarise and explain why and how that is relevant.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jojo's Bizarre Adventure is about awesome dudes that fight with other dudes with awesome abilities. Like in One Piece, but crazier. Like ability to inflate metal or turn body into a rope.
And while in early parts made in 80's, they look like this
In 90's they look like this
And in recent issues they look like this
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yea I'm not touching that one, but as I said, loser fantasy is a very common trope in japanse mangas, and one that they are most famous for in the west, beyond general weirdness, but just because its common doesn't mean that it is universal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
that is what this piece is about, the absurdity of it. Girls don't like shy nervous guys with low self esteem. They are wired to be attracted to winners. That is why the badboy is so alluring for woman. The big difference between men and women are that men are 90% attracted to a woman's physical appearance, while women are 90% attracted to a man's aura. His confidence, his self esteem, how he carries himself.
Strong, confident, assertive, that is the primary virtues of maledom.
but for girls it is: beauty, grace and taste.
A man can be butt ugly, balled , fat dwarf and still be a chick magnet. Of course this ball, fat dwarf would also attract men, not in a sexual way but because he is interesting, funny and just all around nice to be around with. That is the key difference between men and woman.
Woman are passive, there is very little they can do to increase their value, either they are hot because they have been blessed with a good body, or they are not. But for men it is all about how their wires are connected.
Losers fantasy is always about a man getting lucky. That some sweet (and hot) girl is able to look passed his shy and clumsy exterior and see his inner self. The lie they don't want to admit is that that shy clumsy exterior is their inner self, there is nothing to look past, and there is never going to come a hot girl that will like them until they learn to like themselves. That is the key difference between a winner and a loser, the loser hates himself, the winner loves himself.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yeah, but I am one of the readers of manga...you think i am a loser...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That really depends on which kinds of manga thou read. My personal favourite "Naruto" isn't about losers, but a lot of mangas are. This is what this art piece addresses, makes fun at. How magical girls that are al perfect tens consistently falls for men that are barely a 4.
The rules of dating is very simple, if thou want to date a 10 thou got to be a 10.
So yes, if thou like loser fantasy literature, then thou properly are a loser, but mangas are actually much broader then that, it have just become infamous for this trope.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
I was joking. I do read it, but only because there is some kick butt awesome fighter.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
and a kick butt awesome fighter is not usually a shy loser that's afraid of girls and his own shadow.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Not the shy guy, the girl who want to be with the shy guy...however if someone made a game where you played a Shy Guy, the ladies would be all upon that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Is that a name of some Mario villain?
Anyway, shy guy, that reminds me of the trope "Hollywood nerd" tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php…
Notice the difference between the two pictures.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yep...i thought i would be funny
yeah, i guess it is kind of a troupe now. But still, I guess it is simply the human desire that despite being less that attractive, we can still find someone who is hot. And there are some Mangas that have the guy trying to improve himself, in some way or another. The mangas that just have the guy acting like he always does, and just enjoys having a hot girlfriend without any work on his part, THOSE are the ones i can't stand.
I once had an idea of a manga that the girl who is a straight up 11 in society finds a guy who is a 5 and, due to a dare, dates him. what society does not know, is that the guy is actually a masked fighter in a battle sport (similar to Super Smash Bro's) and the girl is the only one to find out about him, due to a struggle with some punks. He prefers being a 5 and is not very happy about dating the girl, but the dare is still on, and the stakes are high, with her blackmailing him with his identity, and the loser of the dare has to give up $1000. (or some other high stake like that)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
first of all the scale only goes up to 10, and only goddesses can be a natural ten, 9's can appear a 10 with the right makeup, cloths and grooming.
that guy then have hidden qualities, so he doesn't fall under the trope of this piece. But western medias also have this. I have heard about a couple of movies like this. One about a creepy guy that stacks a girl way out of his leage and ends with him standing outside of her window with a boombox, and despite being a loser and a creep he gets the girl because it is a movie and he is the protagonist. I would have prefeered her calling her father that would have come after him with a baseball bat.
Another had a guy ruining a girls wedding.
tv-land likes to make losers heroes, because there are so many of them in real life, and none of them are heroes, but all of them dream to be.
Al Bundy and Homor Simpsons are two famous examples of loser protagonist. the former we just wants to see suffer to feel better then, but the later have success for no reason.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You're just the other face of the same (loser) coin...
humans are humans. Losers who fantasize about magical girl being interested in them for nothing more than the mere merit of existing are idiots, but people who think they know what ALL women like are no different in their objectification of the other sex and projection of their power fantasies. Especially those who say women have nothing else than their looks while men can control their attractiveness... -_-
Humans are humans. Everyone will have different traits and personalities. People who look alike in character, values and interests will get along more easily. Some people will like to hang with people very different to complete each other, some people will refuse to date only one person (polyamorous) while other prefer exclusive relationships. It's all a matter of individuals, and avoiding meaningless social constructs.
People who let themselves dominated by those social constructs tend to repeat the same mistakes that makes them miserable.
Treat a person according to who he/she is. Not according to what he/she has between his/her legs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
True humans are a very diverse species, but gender is a very big part of our identity, and our animal brain, the inner part of the brain that control our most basic desires are very simple. Female wants as strong a male as possible, they want winners, so their children can be winners. Men just wants to spread their seeds.
It is like the old story of the flowers and the bees.
Thou gotta have head that, or have the saying been corrupted in English with rhyme favoured over substance?
Anyway, women are like flowers, and men are like bees.
The more advanced part of our brain gives us superficial differences, but deep down, what we have between our legs is all that truly matters. And thou cannot ask a woman what she wants, because she doesn't know, its all subconscious desires. We are when we come down to it, just animals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Gender is mainly social construct. Any basic knowledge of sociology and anthropology allows to see it, and it is further supported by neuro-chemical evidences.
Human brain plasticity is very high. Only 10% of our neurons are formed at birth, the rest being connected through our social experiences, making any behavioral studies quite complex, and mostly influenced by current society norms. And no, the "inner part of the brain" does not control "ou most basic desires". Your poor understanding of the brain is laughable. How do you define strenght and "winers"? This is the most absurd thing I've ever seen. Especially since we know paleolithic societies had a great sexual equality in decision making, as it can be proven by high genetic and genealogic variety amongst hunter-gatherer tribe, as opposed to patriarchic neolithic tribes were there is a "bulk" of preservation of the same genes since the men stay and gets to decide who is exchanged (in "wedding") with other tribes, puting the genetic material of women in the peripheries.
Further more, in the pathetic verbal diarhea that your text consists in, you deny any agency to women, as opposed to men. If this is not the power fantasy of a loser who think of himself as an "alpha male" (Alphas in wolf society is another myth by the way), then it can only be complete ignorance. Anyways, any guy who says: "but gender is a very big part of our identity, and our animal brain" and makes My Little Pony mosaics in his DA gallery is either a contradicting hypocrite or, at best, a complete fool.
Nice journal about your oh so painful MLP fan art by the way. I'm reading it and showing it to friends of mine with whom we like to laugh at our weekly internet idiots. It's like the french movie "Le diner de con" (Dinner of fools/the dinner game) but with idiots (you) of the internet.
Crying over what happens in a cartoon is, after all, most certainly the demonstration of strenght and winning character that will get you laid! (not)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
First of all ad hominem is really childlike, but thanks for reminding me of that journal, I had meant to delete that a long time ago, and kind of thought that I had.
"Anyway gender is a social construct" That is pretty easy to falsify. First of all there are significant physical differences between a male and a female brain. The male brain is significantly larger then the female brain, now I am not saying that makes men smarter, I have never claimed superiority, only difference. Because the difference between men and woman are huge. And goes far beyond humans.
A significant anthropological experiment a few years ago tested the difference between male and female human babies, and found an inherent interest in action based toys such as plastic cars in the males, and an inherent interest for nurturing based toys such as dolls in the females. Later experiments tested it with similar result on chimpanzee babies.
Now I do not doubt that thou will now try to immunize the hypothesise be finding ways to disregard the staggering scientific evidence against it, but then it stops being science all together
Believing that gender is a social construct is nothing short of fantasy, occam's razor dictates that it should be discarded.
Now when I in the last post talked about active males and passive females I was referring to the essence of masculinity and femininity. The female strategy in finding a suitable mate is all about waiting and choosing, while the males are about competition and proving. We see this in all animals, snakes, ducks even wolves as thou mentioned.
So no, thou art quite wrong, and the fact that thou felt the need to belittle me about something irrelevant to this discussion is basically the same as playing the hitler card. And yes I am a very good artist, the best in fact in my field. And yes I made a piece about the before mentioned cartoon, right now I am working on a mosaic inspired by Adventure time. And it is one of the few things that actually are a social construct, to believe that cartoons are only for children, good cartoons with depth and compelling characters are for everyone, or sometimes not for children at all. Like one of my other favourite cartoons for instance, South Park. Its brilliant, but I don't think thou will be able to recognise it as such, as it requires an open mind.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I never said it is a problem to like the show. I like it myself.
It is a problem however to like the show AND be a contradicting machist moron as you are.
It is not irrelevant to the discussion to mention your complete lack of coherence, highlighting the fact
you whine like a spoiled brat over the direction not even so bad, although the episode WAS indeed rushed
and failed, that the show took.
(The decision is further positive in season 4 since Twilight get to know how to become a princess but is put into
positions where her role is just to wave and smile, and she refuses this limitation that is imposed on her, teaching
to young girls how to refuse gender stereotyping imposed on them and to strive for more, as they are all human
individuals just like anyone else. )
And I recall many passages in Adventure Time which have similar positive messages. Those show ARE indeed briliant.
If really you like those (AT and MLP) shows, you really should pay attention more on what extremely positive message they display instead of being the self-entitled loser you are right now.
For the brain differences, those are myths and babies ARE conditionned VERY soon. As long as you do not take newborn babies of the day, they will still have been subject to social conditionning as a baby will have been more exposed to a certain kind of toy according to its biological sex, thus misleading the experiment as the baby will indeed prefer what it knows, what it has been exposed to.
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/scien…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
yes I knew thou would say something like that, but that just makes it non-falsifiable pseudo science. A theory that can explain everything explains nothing.
But I really try to give it the benefit of the doubt, as there are lots of non-human experiments with similar result. But these ape-babies have properly also been socially conditioned.
And how animals mate, these can properly also be discarded somehow. And so can the thousand of years of experiences we have of gender.
I really mean it when I say that "gender is a social construct" is literally the dumbest theory I have heard. Creationists makes more sense. At least they have an explanation "that a wizard on a cloud did it" which is more then then can be said about you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Unfortunately you're the one who uses pseudo-science references dating from the XIXth century.
You have nothing to base your claims on except false pretense of tradition "thousand of years we have of gender"
wich is a pretty stupid affirmation since through history, our perception of gender changed and varied greatly. Up to the XIXth century,
in common misconceptions, it was the women who were craving for sex, unable to control their passion, as men were judged to be the rational
side of our kind, able to control its pulsions and resist the temptation of women.
Pink was a color attributed to young boy in the upper-class of the beginning of the XXth century, and blue attributed to little girls.
As for animals, we can't just pretend "animals mate" all this way, since the animal kingdom is most diverse in the ways the species reproduce themselves.
In many species, the female is larger and stronger than the male, even in mammals (hyenas for example, in wich female are dominant and the male are submissive). In some bird and reptile species, there are even more than 2 gender. In certain monkey societies, female mate with more than one male, and they all help taking care of the babies. Bonobos (closest parent to chimp) are very "libertin" as sex is for them the mean of appeasing any social tension and mate with anyone of any sex.
Your poor knowledge of science, nature, modern psychology, sociology and history makes you an ignorant, and your refusal to get educated makes you an idiot. Are you an american? I wouldn't be surprised you're an american.
BTW, you're still a whiny loser crying over direction taken by shows, unable to get their message straight and contradicting himself when talking of "strenght". You have no credibility whatsoever in talking about so-called "strenght" and female mind, as everything in your behavior suggest you're exactly the kind of loser you loathe in your comment.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
1st stopping talking about a history that everybody knows, its irrelevant.
2nd Stop using Roman numerals about centuries, it is so incredibly pretentious.
And at least do it right, it is XXI century research. The I comes after both X's to indicate that it is 10+10+1=21st
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
History is always relevant when confronted to the ignorant bullshit you are shooting out.
As a University student and future history teacher, I have studied history, taken class on
sociology, anthropology and psychology (complement for pedagogy).
None of your claims are valid point for common nor advanced knowledge in either of those fields,
and neuro-biology is backing up this knowledge I'm talking about.
cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/3055…
"With respect to how the media claims that cerebral specialisation differs between males and females, Dr Vidal said: 'Theories on hemispheric differences between the sexes in language are at least 30 years old. They have not been confirmed by recent studies of brain imaging that allow us to see the living brain at work. These theories were often based on observations conducted on very small samples.'
According to Dr Vidal, 'they continue to cite those studies while the contemporary scientific reality is quite different.' Therefore, the meta-analysis, based on the conclusions of all experiments published in scientific literature, and covering several hundred men and women, show that 'there is no statistically significant difference between the sexes in the hemispheric distribution of language areas,' as she explained. The locations of the language areas vary considerably from one individual to another. 'This variability outweighed the possible variability between the sexes,' Dr Vidal remarked."
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic…
"
There are only a few brain characteristics for which the term sexually dimorphic, which literally means having two forms, is appropriate, that is, for which there is minimal or no overlap between the form of this characteristic in males and females (e.g., the size of the sexually dimorphic nucleus of the preoptic area, which is three to eight times larger in male rats compared to female rats, Swaab, 1995 ). For most documented sex differences in the brain, however, and in particular in regions involved in behavior, emotion, and cognition, there is a considerable overlap between the distributions of the two sexes (Juraska, 1991 ; McCarthy and Konkle, 2005 ; Cosgrove et al., 2007 ; Koscik et al., 2009 ; Lenroot and Giedd, 2010 ). It follows, that individuals may have the “female” or the “male” form for any of these non-dimorphic characteristics. The question then becomes whether the brain of a given individual is homogenous or heterogeneous with respect to the “male/female” type of its different brain characteristics1 .
Current data on the effects of environmental events on brain structure strongly suggest that heterogeneity in the “male/female” type of an individual’s brain characteristics is the rule, rather than the exception. Specifically, prenatal and postnatal manipulations (e.g., exposing dams to stress, maternal separation, rearing conditions, early handling, acute and chronic postnatal stress, prenatal exposure to psychoactive drugs, anesthesia) have been shown in rats to reverse, abolish, create, or exaggerate sex differences in brain characteristics. For example, Shors et al. (2001 ) found that exposure of adult rats to acute stress (a) reversed a sex difference in the density of the apical dendritic spines of pyramidal neurons in area CA1 of the hippocampus (see Figure Figure1A1A for illustration); (b) led to the emergence of a sex difference in the density of basal dendritic spines in CA1 (Figure (Figure1B);1B); and (c) had no effect on the density of dendritic spines in the somatosensory cortex (Figure (Figure11C)."
Biased informations based on misconception dating from the XIX (yes, 19th century. Also, if you're
unable to exactly get what I mean by XIXth century, I'm talking about the 1800's) does not
constitute facts. You have yet to point out the source of the said study.
I, on the other hand, provided FACTS. Your claims about "what we desire" are nothing more than pathetic excuses
you made up to try to comfort yourself in the power fantasies you have. Ever heard about cognitive bias? Since
you ARE a loser and unable to maintain decent human relationship with people according to their sex, you try to
hide yourself in misconseption, "craniology" herited myths and strictly phenomenological occasional observation that
in no way explain how those phenomenon develop themselves.
It is a sign of poor intelligence to confuse correlation and causality.
And no ammount of diversion tactics and troll-mode pathetic defenses will change anything to the fact that you are completely
and utterly wrong, because of the fact you are a loser who tries to make other believe you are anything else, and hope that SOME DAY
you'll be the "dominant" idiot you want to become and not the whiny insect you are right now.
Don't try to play that troll game on me. I'll crush you. I already have.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
First of all, sorry for the late reply, I had stuff to do.
Second, here is a link to the article I referred to last time www.livescience.com/22677-girl…
Third, as a rule I refuse to address ad hominem accusations.
Now I understand that thou have been conditioned to think that there is no sexual dimorphism in humans, that is a common misconception in our society just like it is a common misconception that there is no such thing as "race" or that races play no significant role. Now like with gender understand that I do not claim that one is superior to the other, only that there is significant differences.
But the differences between the genders are far greater then between the races.
There is a few facts that is true for all woman.
They want to be dominated by a man, and they want the man to always only put them second. Now most women will protest this, and we wont find the truth by handing out questionnaires. Sometimes because women are lying, but most of the time because women don't understand themselves.
Look at the book "Fifty shades of Grey", a best seller, that perfectly exemplifies what I mean. This is about a strong dominant man, the kind of man that every woman wants and every man wants to be.
Masculinity is a powerful active force, and it have nothing to do with culture, and everything to do with nature. It is imbedded in a woman's mind to desire a strong man, strong men gives strong children. Women unlike men, cannot afford to be wrong, they are going to carry his seed inside of them for nine months and then take care of the child for many years.
And this is not just about humans, it is as good as a universal form of masculinity. Male animals of all species fight among themselves to prove that they are the strongest, most viral, and humans aren't that different, not when it comes to sex and reproduction.
A strong, dominant and confident man with a mission is desirable to all women, while a man that tends to her every need and always puts her first is a wimp and a loser, that she may want to keep around as a friend, but that she is not and cannot be attracted to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You've never talked to an intelligent woman didn't you?
I mean, 100% of the women I hang out with disagree with what you said you think they want.
In fact, I even made a printscreen of our conversation to show it to some of them so we can laugh at how a pathetic failure of a human being you are.
Nothing you will say will change this fact.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
again ad hominem is like playing the Hitler card, at least do the decent thing and admit that I am right if thou hast no rebuttal.
But ask them about that book, it is a best-seller written by a woman that actually understand her own sexuality.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You only take anecdotal and unquotted articles. You have no source, so why should I care about what the fucking piece of shit that you are says?
You only claim things that can all be linked to social education. There are tons of people who are completely against the kind of message of this "best-seller". My female friends are all against this piece of shit.
Well since I have educated friends, they all tend to see "para-litterature" as piece of shit, since it mostly is. Commercial bullshit that keep people ignorant and drill them with completely backward messages.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
One cannot deny history.
It is a sign of great arrogance to consider ourself above our nature.
Stop to think for a moment why every single culture without exception in all of history makes such distinctions between men and women. there is a reason why men are men and women are women just like their is a reason why leaves are green.
Culture is about the differences between people, when something is universal it should be pretty damn clear that it is nature and not culture.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am to be a teacher in history and read abundantly on anthropology and sociology.
Don't try to lecture me about it.
Differences between the roles of men and women aren't so constant in history and worldwide cultures.
They vary a lot according to said cultures.
Once again, you prove your ignorance.
Get back in your mom's basement, you fucking loser.
Get back to cry about how a cartoon took a direction you don't like and pretend afterward that women want a dominant male to excuse the fact that not any one of them want to fuck the pathetic worthless excuse of a human being you are.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I am done talking with thee, thy childlike insistence on ad hominem attack is beneath me. If thou truly art at a college level, where thou is able to teach history to elementary school children, then thou art a true testament to the failure of our educational system.
An elementary school history teacher ought to know more then thou hast displaced. Children's minds are fragile an easily seduced.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm at university level.
I'll teach to high school students.
And the young people at the school I had my first apprenticeship where all very intelligent and, I would say, enlightened.
And by "Our educational system", I think you should stop assuming everyone around here is an american.
We all know your schooling system is producing dumbfucks. You are one of them. I don't give a shit that you consider this an "Ad hominem". You don't know the fuck what is an ad hominem. An Ad Hominem is a fallacious argument where the only way someone can adress the other's point is with insults. I adress your point with FACTS and THEN proceed to insult you as you deserve to be since you're a piece of trash, a pathetic excuse of a human being.
I don't give a shit about being polite with idiots who consider women like objets or kind of unsentient animals.
I think your kind of basement-dweller should get chemically castrated.
And coming from the idiot who said that using the roman numerals (as it is a convention) in naming the centuries was arrogant, your usage of older english forms like "thou, thee, thy" is laughable.
You won't gain any credibility by talking like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Meanwhile, in another bar in Anime Land:
Nice, Dull, Nondescript Japanese Boy:
I just want to date a girl without having to wait 24+ episodes. Is that too much to ask?
Other guys:
YES.
:3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
You say what you will. Someone whos willing to put up with the wacky shit that happens in anime is not an average guy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>