HOME | DD

latuff β€” The Peace Road

Published: 2003-06-06 20:00:42 +0000 UTC; Views: 6499; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 176
Redirect to original
Description THE "ROAD MAP": ANOTHER CHARADE
by Rowan Berkeley

"Let the Arabs think he (Sharon) will agree to a (Palestinian) state. He will put enough conditions and obstacles that will prevent the creation of the state forever." --Rabbi David Algaze

During the Clinton era, then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak made a supposedly magnanimous peace offer to Yasser Arafat at Camp David in July, 2000. The Washington Post, NY Times, Boston Globe, L.A. Times, Chicago Tribune, US News and World Report, USA Today, [link] and the five major television news networks all hailed the Israeli deal as "offering extraordinary concessions" and "far-reaching concessions," as well as "unprecedented concessions" and "the most far-reaching offer ever." When the Palestinian leader rejected this supposedly benevolent Israeli olive branch of generosity, he thereby "proved" that Palestinians are nothing but a nation of terrorists who hate peace and Jews in that irrational and racist order.

That's the propaganda cover story anyway, and it's had a lengthy shelf life in the American media. In truth, Arafat was offered a chopped up West Bank and Gaza akin to the discontiguous Bantustans of the South African apartheid system. Roughly the same crooked deal is being offered by Bush to Mahmoud Abbas, the new Palestinian Prime Minister: the Israelis will dismantle token settlements on worthless chunks of real estate, but all of the other illegal settlements in Palestine will remain, thus legitimizing the incremental theft of occupied land which has been underway since 1967.

For a harbinger of what Bush and Sharon will propose, take a brief look at Israel's 2000 Camp David deal. This treaty would have divided what is left of the already truncated nation of Palestine into three disconnected ghettos. It would have "annexed strategically important and highly valuable sections of the West Bank" and "make it impossible for the Palestinians to travel or trade freely within their own state" without permission of the Israeli government. This would be an "independent state"?

The most fertile West Bank land would have gone to the Israelis. This Palestinian land also contains the region's most precious water supplies. Palestinians in their "new state" would have been forced to cross into Israeli-controlled territory and onto "bypass roads" each time they traveled or shipped merchandise from one part of their nation to another. It would be like ceding only part of Pennsylvania to American patriots, with the main highway and surrounding land between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh remaining in the hands of the hostile British. Such an "independent state" would in fact be little more than a chimera, creating a pretense for the sake of placating world opinion. In fact, like the Bush Road Map, under the terms of the Clinton/Barak Camp David deal, Palestine would have become a degraded satrapy of Israel.

Analyst Seth Ackerman observes that,"Had the Palestinians accepted these terms they would have locked in place many of the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end" and "waiving all further claims against Israel."

Any Palestinian leader who acceded to such a betrayal would have gone down in Arab history as the Judas of the age. Had Arafat agreed he would have become a kind of kapo for the Israelis, administering a glorified prison camp on behalf of Zionist jailers. Barak's Camp David plan was no peace deal, but rather an offer of ceremonial surrender of Palestinian national autonomy to the conquering colonial power similar to the swindle Bush is promoting. For the Barak/Clinton "peace plan," the American media played the game for all it was worth, quoting Judaic religious sources, settlers and Israeli politicians as they mouthed the rhetoric of peace and talked of their love of peace and their desire for peace, blah, blah, blah. The same duplicitous pattern is repeating now.

Palestinians since 2000 have suffered massacres and waves of assassinations. They are "negotiating" under extreme duress with a nuclear power that is backed by the world's only superpower, neither of whom care a farthing for the humanity of Palestinians. The American and Israeli governments seek to give the illusion of a just and humane settlement in order to placate European and Arab allies.

Fresh from killing more than 100 Palestinian civilians thus far in 2003, as well as dozens of assassinations of Palestinian leaders, the murder of American Rachel Corrie, the destruction of Palestinian homes, the razing of Palestinian olive and orange groves, the barricading of cities and the collective punishment of the entire Palestinan nation with shoot-on-sight curfews and destruction of water, sewer and electrical infrastructure, another Zionist "peace plan," now called the "Road Map" is on its farcial course, giving Ariel "the Butcher of Beirut" Sharon the opportunity to posture in the American media as a "peacemaker."

This "Road Map" charade ignores several crucial factors: the Israelis have already carved up the occupied territories with a series of fences, trenches and settlements. The Arab land seized by the large settler enclaves will never be returned by Sharon. Sharon is the crazed settlers' main patron and an architect of their racist movement. 250,000 fanatical fundamentalist Israeli settlers now occupy Palestinian land, up from 125,000 such settlers in 1994. The goal of these bigoted Talmudic fundamentalists, as repeatedly stated in their own religious publications (under the code-word "Amalek") is the extermination of the Palestinians, whom they deride as Amalek.

President Bush is playing a heartless, cynical game. He must mollify Tony Blair and Vladimir Putin if he wishes to have any allies anywhere, and the Israelis are willing to play along, posing as peacemakers while their war crimes and atrocities are neatly forgotten in the euphoria centered on the new "kinder, gentler" Sharon. By this stratagem the Israelis reap a public relations windfall.

The American Zionists and the Israelis know full well that Palestinian resistance (i.e. "violence") will continue, no matter what the new Palestinian Prime Minister Abbas promises Sharon. Abbas' inability to halt the armed Palestinian resistance to Israeli Occupation will be cited as "evidence of the treachery and bad faith of the Palestinians," when in fact Abbas is a but a figurehead with no power to command enraged bands of Palestinian resistance fighters who have watched helplessly as their grandmothers, wives and children have all been blown away by Israeli helicopter gunships, tanks and infantry.

It should not be forgotten that the Israelis have a virtual license to murder any Palestinian, with the exception of the new Prime Minister and the Prime Minister emeritus (Arafat). Any other Palestinian may be killed at will. This horrible fact is a daily reality in the occupied territories and the record of these Israeli murders is fresh in the minds of the men and women of Palestine. It is folly to expect the Palestinian resistance to be pacified or gulled by the spectre of the latest round of American diplomacy.

The Israelis slaughtered much of the Palestinian police force in March and April of 2002. Any new Palestinian police department assembled under the "Road Map," would be a turncoat mercenary force working ultimately for Sharon and hated by the Palestinian people who will view such cops as an auxiliary of the Israeli army, doing Israeli dirty work.

The "Road Map" ignores these realities because it has been deliberately concocted to disappoint the absurd expectations that have been artificially raised on its behalf. The hidden truth is that the Bush Road Map is pre-ordained to fail. This Zionist stratagem will be incomprehensible to the non-chess players reading this, but the fact is, expectations are being inflated and the "Road Map" destined to fail so that the subsequent failure can be blamed on the Palestinians and their "intransigent terrorist mentality." Having thus gained a new moral mandate for more war, occupation and transfer, Bush and Sharon will say, "We did all we could for peace," prior to returning to the business of mass murder and state terror.

The US government and media have no patience with the Palestinians. They believe they are fated to be slaves and now, with the Road Map, the Palestinians have the "golden opportunity" to choose what sort of chattel they will become. They have the choice of being shot by the hundreds year after year in what is, in effect, a slow-motion holocaust, or they can live as contented darkies on an American-brokered Israeli plantation.

The American media's take on the Palestinians is that they are a perennial pain in the neck who should accept any crumb "God's Chosen People" deign to toss them on the road to overcoming them by a combination of violence and diplomatic chicanery. That's the authentic "road" Mr. Bush's "map" is pointing toward. When this slavish "Road Map" explodes in the smoke and fire of Palestinian resistance, we will be back to square one, with an even more jaundiced opinion of the Palestinians by Americans outraged at their "rejection of the generous peace offer."

Sharon's secret strategy behind the "peace" offensive, was revealed last winter by a prominent orthodox rabbi: "Why is Sharon doing this? Why is he so vehemently and vociferously supporting the creation of a 'Palestinian' state?...Sharon is fighting a war on the diplomatic field. As a general he knows that the most important quality in war is guile...he has apparently concluded that the best way to fight this battle is by cunning. Let the Arabs think he will agree to a state. He will put enough conditions and obstacles that will prevent the creation of the state forever. Let the European Union and the (U.S.) State Department get off his back as he now tells them that he subscribes to their theories. Why not? It does not make an iota of difference in the real world. Sharon is counting on the Arabs' stupidity and internecine hatred to prevent the rise of another Arab state. In the meantime, Israel is killing the terrorists, destroying their infrastructure and putting a big dent on the Arabs' public image. He has no intention of letting the tragedy of an Arab state in the Land of Israel happen..." --Rabbi David Algaze, The Jewish Press (Brooklyn, NY); Jan. 10, 2003, p. 59.

The diabolically clever Bush/Sharon "Road Map " serves to enhance the public relations image of the Israeli state, and blacken the image of its victims, as the low intensity genocide against the Palestinians and the theft of their land continues apace. This is the big picture which the infantalized American people do not grasp and which the American media will not publish or broadcast. The stage is thus set for ever more shedding of the blood of innocents in the God-forsaken sandbox the world calls the Holy Land.
Related content
Comments: 26

SchattenLotus [2020-06-27 15:30:28 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mark570 [2020-01-24 03:54:53 +0000 UTC]

Anti-semita nojento!Β  Teu lugar Γ© na CADEIA!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Stolicus [2014-04-25 11:26:56 +0000 UTC]

...Highway to Hell...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nobodylivershere [2011-03-07 19:16:29 +0000 UTC]

anti-semetic pig

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-04-29 16:30:51 +0000 UTC]

You'll find that reality stings, and so does the truth

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-12 15:45:09 +0000 UTC]

The left sure has a bias,
the big guy is always evil.
i didn't see the left pissing themselves when russia at chechniyan cities at random, i didn't see the left crying about the treatment of the kurds by the turkish or the iraqis you only cry when Israel is involved in any form of self defense.
So, may i ask you, is the left really for the little guy or simply against the israeli?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-12 16:31:34 +0000 UTC]

Well, when you kill about a hundred times more women and children when your enemy, when you use phosphorous gas and carpet bombing on a civilian population, you're pretty fucking evil. Unless bombing the world's largest concentration camp is somehow heroic.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-13 15:40:02 +0000 UTC]

yeh and also it's easy to comment on a situation when you're not experiencing it. Tell me do you live in constant fear of having a rocket fall on you're house?
do you think that the israelis fight the palestinians for fun?
what only Europe and the US has the right to self-defense? Or again are you just against the israeli?
well from how you ignore every hainous act done by every other nation other than israel then let's just face it you're a big ol' anti-semite with a stalin moustache and a swastika armband to boot. and like you said reality stings

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-13 16:53:40 +0000 UTC]

I've never been to Nazi Germany, but I'm aware that it was utterly evil and responsible for massacres, war crimes and genocide. Are you going to give me shit for unfairly judging the Nazis? Or North Korea, I've never been there and I judge them.

I think the Israelis fight the Palestinians in a combination of agressive colonial expansionism, sheer greed cloaked in a very big persecution complex.

Israel is not fighting for self defense, it hasn't since the Yom Kippur way. Israel is overwhelmingly the agressor in the middle east. They've been expanding their borders by military force almost nonstop since their rise. [link]

I'm not an anti-semite. I just don't happen to be a Zionist. I'm trying to grow a mustache but I'm afraid of it's too thin to lure in any ladies.

As for you, you're engaging overwhelmingly in what George Orwell called doublethink.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-14 14:50:22 +0000 UTC]

first of all that last remark, you my friend are well read !
as for greed? greed for what? territory we have enough without Gaza. Natural resources we have them on our own merit.
The presecution complex well maybe a bit. imperialism probably a result of persecution complex. how were the wars after 1973 not self efense. the peace in the galilee was partially self defens, cast lead was to stop Qassam, rockets from falling onto sderot and the flotilla incident was a result of lack of cooperation on the side of the participants and lack of preperation on the side of the IDF naval commando .Anything else you have to say?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-14 18:00:33 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, endless territorial expansion by the part of the colonial policies of the Israeli government. At present there have been 418 Palestinian villages bulldozed or destroyed by the Israelis to make way for settlers. [link]

This hardly strikes me as the behavior of a defenseless victim. More like an agressive conqueror' one that has over two hundred nuclear missiles and recieves yearly four billion dollars in aid, especially military aid from the United States.

Well at least you haven't tried to pass off the Flotilla incident as agressive military action on the part of the Flotilla. With regards to the Flotilla I agree.

Though by far the Palestinians have lost more people than the Israelis.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-14 19:35:17 +0000 UTC]

yeh keep the arguments comin' you pose a great thought challenge sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-14 19:59:07 +0000 UTC]

Well I'm glad you find me a challenge.

on the record, I'd like to apologize if I came across as an asshole. It's the internet and emotions run hot, including my own

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-14 19:34:15 +0000 UTC]

the villages which got bulldozed, not for settlers(lieberman though would love that) they wew bulldozed because they support militants posing and existential threat to israeli citizens. now the nuclear missiles.
Let's go back to the cold war the USSR and the USA built missiles to deter each other. Israel Builds missiles to deter anyone who decides to grow himself a pair of radioactive balls. As you can see Iran already has radioactive balls but they're not exactly operational.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-14 20:00:16 +0000 UTC]

Alright, I suppose that at this point I don't really have much to go on.

you haven't outright denied my facts that were true and you've offered back facts that were true in turn.

I think my argument train is losing steam.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-13 15:35:33 +0000 UTC]

so is forbidding a culture heroic?
is invading a country for oil heroic?
is what russia did in chechnya heroic?
And how the heck can an air-force without strat-bombers able to carpet bomb anything?
check you're facts you tea-sipping western asshole.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-13 16:48:20 +0000 UTC]

Oh far from it, these actions are despicable in the utmost. And in no way do I support Russia's invasion of Chechnya.

On the other hand, when it comes to Israel, the road goes both ways. They have the right to exist, same as any nation does, but they are not special nor do they deserve any elevated status over the people around them.

Well, rest assured, Israel loves to bomb civillian targets. They've used white phosphorus repeatedly against civillains, indiscriminately killing women and children and destroying infrastructure. If you want links I'd be happy to privide them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-14 14:43:10 +0000 UTC]

well said the white phosphorous claim is true other than one single detail.
the phosphorous is not used as a chemical weapon(it's stupid to use because of it's consequences) but the IDF expands it's arsenals of tanks,UAVs and missile boats not smokescreans therefore they use WW2 era tech.
About the bombing civilians and infrastructure it's called inaccuracy even though as warfare has demonstrated sometimes pilots and other long ranged weapon operators act on their own accord for which an entire army suffers othere then that most air-force pilots and artillary gunners obey the don't destroy civilian homes, lives and infrastructure(this is all from someone who served in the artillary corps).

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-14 18:16:42 +0000 UTC]

Phosphorous is an incendiary material, it burns and burns even when you pour water on something and it was used on civillian population. And to be frank, your use of the term "inaccuracy" horrifies me when you use it to describe bombing of civillian popualations, any civillian population.

So what you're saying is that these soldiers are not responsible for their actions or it's just a few bad apples. Though I do concede the point about the smokescreen gas, the bombing of Gaza is not inaccurate or accidentallly done by a few bad apples.

Gaza is a small area that is home to 1.5 million people. In 2009 Israel engaged in a bombing campaign in Gaza that left 428 Palestinians dead in just seven days, more than the number of Israelis killed in seven years.

So I'm just going to ask you straight up, I'm not trying to be funny. Why do you support Israel?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-14 19:21:17 +0000 UTC]

I am an Israeli, i live in israel, i work in israel i served in the IDF.
The Country has provided me with many amenities such as universal healthcare.
I support israel the same way an american will support Canada or the US.
I support my country because of my heritage. I origniate from the Ukraine
when i emmigrated in the 70's i felt welcome. I support my country because i have a sense of patriotism.
about the "bad apples remark" nobody recieves the order to attack civilians. The order to attack civilians conflicts with the doctorine of the IDF it also conflicts with the oath to the army. the oath sates that you shall not harm any human being and his property. While i was serving i did not recieve the orders to fire at hostile targets only. i no not of the actions of my comrades but i do know that i have never personally fired at any non-combatatants.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-14 19:57:18 +0000 UTC]

I understand then. I live in Canada, and I also get universal healthcare. On the other hand, I am also a highly vocal critic of my government and my country. But point taken.

yes, many East European countries have a long and bad history of anti-semitism.

Alright, another point taken. You're actually the first pro-Israel guy I've debated who was Israeli. Also, for the record I'm not anti-Israeli. I don't support anti-semitism or the totaly removal of Israel.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

nobodylivershere In reply to Master-of-the-Boot [2012-05-15 08:46:32 +0000 UTC]

well first off about my first remarks such as tea-sipping western asshole and the other less than civil remarks. i would like to say though that i personally am a critic of the israeli goverment(especially for social reform). I am personally very much for peace between the israeli and palestinian people it will be a great relief to know that the sons and daughters of the future won't have to fight bloody wars and lose their lives lives for the sake of a religious ideology. I think that peace is possible everywhere and the middle east is no exception.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Master-of-the-Boot In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-15 09:07:38 +0000 UTC]

Well you don't strike me as a bad person, or an ill informed one,

i think you have the right idea in mind. I argued with another guy over Israel and he blocked me before I could get in a reply, so when I saw your comment about anti-semitism I assumed the worst. My prejudice . . .

Anyway, I find myself agreeing a hundred percent with you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

nobodylivershere In reply to nobodylivershere [2012-05-12 15:45:57 +0000 UTC]

*when russia fired artillary

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mfunky [2003-07-06 04:05:32 +0000 UTC]

cool but i didnt real all what u wrote !!!but i think u r a wise man 7 u speake nothin but the truth?!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

anotherworld [2003-06-06 22:28:45 +0000 UTC]

Isto estΓ‘ Γ³ptimo!!!!! Os meus parabΓ©ns e agradecimentos!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0