HOME | DD

Published: 2010-03-08 11:24:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 2633; Favourites: 38; Downloads: 132
Redirect to original
Description
Heavy animation warning!!!!A journey to the inside of a minibulb....
WARNING it is a SURREAL ROLLERCOSTER
Subblues pixelbender.script, as always...
Related content
Comments: 23
MANDELWERK In reply to mmnlgrgrks [2013-11-16 20:16:09 +0000 UTC]
And that was 2010...check out my new pieces...
THANK YOU!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kestarren [2013-03-31 23:06:16 +0000 UTC]
It starts to make more sense when you keep watching, & so it becomes more beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MANDELWERK In reply to Kestarren [2013-04-01 10:22:07 +0000 UTC]
Thank you Kestarren, glad you like it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MANDELWERK In reply to crotafang [2010-04-19 10:11:23 +0000 UTC]
It is!
Amazed every time a rendering is finished...
Z>Zn+c
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MANDELWERK In reply to bermarte [2010-03-10 07:55:21 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, me too!
Would like more details and frames, but to do that I need another tool...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Trance-Plant [2010-03-09 17:29:04 +0000 UTC]
This is pretty cool. It could be a bit smoother in the transitions. One doesn't maintain any contextual focal point from frame to frame in many cases. Would probably result in way too many frames and an excessive rendering time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MANDELWERK In reply to Trance-Plant [2010-03-10 07:53:23 +0000 UTC]
Thing is I rendered this frame by frame, manually, and each frame took about 15 minutes to render (HDTV-resolution in the original), so in some locations I got bored and skipped some frames.
The good thing about doing frame by frame is that I can make more frames when a lot is going on, so the "speed" is really changing all the time.
I still can make the "missing frames", if I get the motivation...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Trance-Plant In reply to MANDELWERK [2010-03-10 20:35:12 +0000 UTC]
Sounds positively agonizing!!! I find I'll just run a batch of 500 between sweet spots. When I see it is too fast I'll go back in and build denser frame increments where needed. Sometimes I'll get lucky and the new ones won't completely duplicate the old ones. Right now my stuff just does linear interpolations. Maybe with zooms I need to do something that is linear in the log scale. I find Tacitus is slow with CPU and very fast with GPU. Problem with GPU is that the resolution must be rather small and no aa. Today I managed to get a bunch out at 720x720 but usually it's about 512x512.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MANDELWERK In reply to Trance-Plant [2010-03-11 07:45:35 +0000 UTC]
Why don't you download Pixelbender, it is really fast on the GPU, and I can do 4000x4000 pix WITH AA...
Cool if you do a deep zoom TP!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0