HOME | DD

Published: 2014-05-08 16:19:14 +0000 UTC; Views: 7329; Favourites: 426; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Canon EOS 60DCanon EF 50mm f/1.8
ISO 100, f/3.2, 1/40 sec
Natural light, tripod and a remote shutter.
I'm thinking about reshooting this in the near future, as the focus isn't as sharp as I'd like, so any tips for the next shoot would be great.
You can follow me on Facebook here: www.facebook.com/mialepsonphotβ¦
Related content
Comments: 73
Roxy-the-art-nut [2014-09-18 12:41:28 +0000 UTC]
Stunning self portrait...I'm a fan of self portraits as well Β The colors here are amazing...great work Β Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
smith4891 [2014-05-14 14:51:04 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful shot. I love the capture of your hair in motion. Mesmerizing eyes also.
π: 0 β©: 1
NikHero In reply to mialepson [2014-05-13 21:18:03 +0000 UTC]
You are welcome. You do great work!
π: 0 β©: 0
avalanchepark [2014-05-10 03:48:56 +0000 UTC]
saw 'Lace' om the undiscovered gallery which brought me over to look at your stuff. Love the lighting on this, complement of the hair skin and lip colors and the sharp focus against the dark background
π: 0 β©: 1
rerumfontis [2014-05-10 03:12:18 +0000 UTC]
I love this ..Γ± it has clarity where it is needed but softness overall ... I like the depth of fiele and lighting ... the model is beautiful ... a lovely work!
π: 0 β©: 1
laurentroy [2014-05-09 15:39:53 +0000 UTC]
Gorgeous portraiture ! Congrats to both the model and the photographer !Β
The focus looks perfect to me. The only blur is on the end of the hairs, which is not surprising as they are moving andΒ this was shot a 1/40 sec... And as there is movement, maybe do you make a mistake: Maybe the focus is perfect but there is a little movement blur (even on the face): 1/40s isΒ a very slow shutter speed...
The two options I'm thinking aboutΒ are:
Β - increase the light, which would permit to increase the shutter speed, but as it's natural light I don't know if it's possible or not...
Β - increase the ISO (maybe 640 or 800, not muchΒ moreΒ to avoidΒ noise) so you could both increase the aperture (to have more depth of field), and the shutterΒ speed at the same time...
Hoping it'll help a bit...
π: 0 β©: 1
mialepson In reply to laurentroy [2014-05-09 18:44:09 +0000 UTC]
Thank you!
The choices of settings are pretty much intentional - the slow shutter speed to get the movement of the hair, the not so low big aperture to make it easier to get the focus (big apertures are hell to work with on shoots with a lot of movement ), and the low ISO because... well, becuase I could. I'll definitely take your comment into consideration for the next attempt, though
π: 0 β©: 1
laurentroy In reply to mialepson [2014-05-09 22:44:48 +0000 UTC]
I understand. Just hoping it'll help a bit...
π: 0 β©: 0
mialepson In reply to azhogisheck [2014-05-09 14:05:16 +0000 UTC]
Thanks, no, it's not.
π: 0 β©: 1
azhogisheck In reply to mialepson [2014-05-09 14:12:20 +0000 UTC]
Really? You wear it as is if it were.Β
π: 0 β©: 1
mialepson In reply to azhogisheck [2014-05-09 14:27:56 +0000 UTC]
I've had it for about 7 years, so that might explain it Heh
π: 0 β©: 1
azhogisheck In reply to mialepson [2014-05-09 14:54:32 +0000 UTC]
Love it that much can't let it go? it is a lovely color. Thanks for solving my mystery for the day. Lol
π: 0 β©: 1
STONEDAssassin69 [2014-05-09 06:22:07 +0000 UTC]
Such a beautiful pic, those eyes are just gorgeousΒ
π: 0 β©: 1
STONEDAssassin69 In reply to mialepson [2014-05-09 08:52:11 +0000 UTC]
you are most welcome
π: 0 β©: 0
Anisa-Mazaki [2014-05-09 02:01:06 +0000 UTC]
May I borrow this for a pose reference for a character design?
π: 0 β©: 1
Anisa-Mazaki In reply to mialepson [2014-05-09 08:46:03 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much. I'll credit you when I am finished.
π: 0 β©: 0
Observer14 [2014-05-08 20:45:16 +0000 UTC]
I'm going to guess that the blur is due to shutter speed rather than DOF, right? Β I don't know, but I kind of like the feeling of the motion of your hair, just the way it is....
π: 0 β©: 1
mialepson In reply to Observer14 [2014-05-08 21:21:30 +0000 UTC]
That's partly it, yeah. Plus, I work with autofocus (after a lot of shoots I've found that it's what works for me), and with a lot of movement... It's not the most reliable
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>