HOME | DD
mjranum — S.
[NSFW]
Published: 2006-12-19 20:16:49 +0000 UTC; Views: 163560; Favourites: 3354; Downloads: 6487
Redirect to original
Description
Model is S.Lighting was a 7-foot octodome to upper camera right and a small softbox to lower camera left, dialed down -4 stops.
Related content
Comments: 173
That pose, that body, and that model is what nude art is all about. Fantastic work!
👍: 1 ⏩: 0
she is awesome...realy gr8 piece of work...And her curves are just fantastic...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I find this picture truely captivating. As an artist trying to work on pose and anatomy I find the shape of her body quite inspiring to be honest.
As for the picture itself, I really like the lighting and shading on this picture and the model herself is stunning. Amazing work on this piece
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
WOW, what a beautiful shot! Perfect model and a perfect pose.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
great photgraphy.
i love the lightings and expressions u have generated from the model.
simply awesome!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
man ey dont build women like that anymore... one hell of a model.add some sepia and this would make a stunning old school type shot
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Who could say NO to this fabulous, stunning model. Absolutely perfect. - Phil
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Oh my. I don't like to use the word, because it to me is the highest degree of praise for another's looks, but this woman is beautiful. Rather than being hot or sexy, she is beautiful.
My congraulations to the photographer. Not all are capable of making a picture look this soft.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ai, that's hardly fair. Both beautiful and nice. Truly a priveleged young lady.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
beautiful photo. great pose and color scheme, or grey scale. all critique aside, i'd hit that. i'm not a perv, she's just really beautiful.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
She's magnificent. I'd hit that, too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It's always good to know that the photographer is human too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
not only is model beautiful but the soft light and b/w tones are too, damn good work on that!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
all right. please do not take this the wrong way.
how come when people see pictures like this they say its so beautiful, which by the way it is, but when something of the same subject, pose and such, shows up in playboy they flip out and say its disgusting smut?
now i know this just may seem like a stupid kid being, well, stupid, but its just out of pure curiousity.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't know. And, because some people get very upset about it, it's a fairly important/interesting question.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
just wondering. because my dad gets playboy and i've looked through some and i see many artistic nudes that look like they could be in there and vice versa
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think the whole "distinction" between art/porn and artistic/erotic is nonexistent -- it's just a line some people draw between "what I am comfortable with" and "what I am not comfortable with" That's all hypocrisy to me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
it seems so. the line people love to BELIEVE is there but is not
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love this one... specialy her eyes... she has a profound gaze... i love how her body shapes perfectly.
also i wanted to ask you if i could use it as reference to draw... of course linking this picture... and showing you in advanced the final outcome..
thanx!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, you can use this as a ref.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
thanx! maybe you can give me an email adress to send you the final outcome.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Very nice. I love those breasts of hers. So much better without the fur... LOL! Sarah E. has a very exotic kind of beauty, something original and classy that seems to come from somewhere east of the Mediterranean or something. Italian? Greek?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I forget her ancestry. I think eastern european (Polish or something like that)
And, yep, she's definitely got a balcony you could do Shakespeare from.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Love the work. What do you consider is a good pay for models?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Most art models in the US make between $50 at the low end and $150 at the high end per hour.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>