HOME | DD

mrb24 In reply to ??? [2004-07-10 16:07:35 +0000 UTC]

thank you, have a great day

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

blindfive In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 09:09:09 +0000 UTC]

Looks like it's pretty smoggy... I guess all the acid rain is what killed the tree. This is like the foreshawdowing of the Earth's demise... Crazy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to blindfive [2004-07-10 16:10:50 +0000 UTC]

It was a very hot humid day.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Elexorien In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 09:06:02 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful shot, the silhouette is awesome. +fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Elexorien [2004-07-12 01:13:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks, much appreciate the fave. Enjoy your evening.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Sproily In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 09:02:53 +0000 UTC]

I like the silhuette! So Simple and yet so clean. Nice!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Sproily [2004-07-12 01:13:49 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jimdownside In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:49:36 +0000 UTC]

awesome shot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darknessupon In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:46:18 +0000 UTC]

beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to darknessupon [2004-07-12 01:18:47 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rayfan In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:43:21 +0000 UTC]

It's lovely, the simplicity of it is wonderful. I thought it was a drawing, actually, the bird and tree look so stylized.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Rayfan [2004-07-12 01:15:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks, I'm sorry for the late response.......

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rayfan In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-12 03:42:18 +0000 UTC]

No problem. I like the picture a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alex-kom In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:39:18 +0000 UTC]

wow... it's so amazing shot! bird looks like a part of the tree! so quite, so simple, so beautiful shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to alex-kom [2004-07-12 01:15:51 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alex-kom In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-12 08:49:17 +0000 UTC]

you're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

antediluvian-deviant In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:37:01 +0000 UTC]

this is a beautiful image
so simple and sublime
such gorgeous colours
i love the silhouette
and the necker cube
trick that it plays on
your eyes.....the way
the backround and
foreground can flip
....i hope you know
what i mean by that
love it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to antediluvian-deviant [2004-07-10 16:09:08 +0000 UTC]

Much appreciated, I like the way you presented you comment.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

o2c In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:36:26 +0000 UTC]

nice tof

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

zeldadesign In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:19:56 +0000 UTC]

congat , it's surprising fill view

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cajunbaby In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:13:33 +0000 UTC]

its simplistic and vibrent, seems almost out of place. Great shot though!!! it has a good vibe

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to cajunbaby [2004-07-12 01:17:46 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Atake In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:03:18 +0000 UTC]

It's really cool. Like stornn said: absolutely beautiful. It also enjoyed being my background for 2 days.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Atake [2004-07-10 16:10:16 +0000 UTC]

Well thank you for the comment. Have a good day

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

devildevine In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 08:02:38 +0000 UTC]

Very nice shot As earthkat said, simple and beautiful Not a big fan of the border... not that that matters... haha Beautiful shot

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to devildevine [2004-07-12 01:17:07 +0000 UTC]

My borders don't always hit the mark........ it will have to do though? sorry

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

devildevine In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-12 10:02:11 +0000 UTC]

Oh! Don't say sorry! It's a beautiful shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

stornn In reply to ??? [2004-07-09 03:56:13 +0000 UTC]

I love the cleanliness and simplicity - tack sharp, stunning composition. Absolutely beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to stornn [2004-07-10 16:12:11 +0000 UTC]

thanks mate, check inot a Fuji PS2 or the new PS3 that will be coming out soon. I will be leaving this D100 behind.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stornn In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-11 00:13:52 +0000 UTC]

You're moving to the new Fuji? - S2 isn't much of an improvement over the D100, is worse in alot of areas with its craptacular battery system. I'd go D70 with its awesome kit lens if anything, and get some nicer glass. 1/500 flash sync rocks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to stornn [2004-07-12 01:01:54 +0000 UTC]

That is why I will most likely wait for the PS3. The image quality on PS2 out shines the D100 easily. I will most likely use the D100 for my backup of action events.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stornn In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-12 03:23:30 +0000 UTC]

How so does it outshine the D100? Glass makes a big difference in image quality - reviewers and writers say they are both equal cameras. Also, I think the model name is S3 not PS3...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to stornn [2004-07-13 00:50:57 +0000 UTC]

you know what I meant! Any how, the effective output is something like 12 or 13 megapixels as compared to 6.1 which to me equals more information. The glass won't change so that is not a concern. I have spoken to several photo instructors who have settled on the fuji S2. As well as the photo center where I make all of my purchases, both the manager and head technical guy rate it higher then the Nikon's. The manager shoots professionally and that is his camera of choice as well. If money wasn't an option and I could buy all new lenses I would get a CANON Mark II

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stornn In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-13 01:20:08 +0000 UTC]

, just kidding with the model designation thing. And the effective output is after interpolation. I'd have a look at Thom Hogans comparison first (www.bythom.com)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to stornn [2004-07-13 01:26:05 +0000 UTC]

I could read and speak with a hundred people and get what I want to hear in the end...... the technologies is changing so fast....... I am willing to wait a bit to see if NIKON will come out with some new technology, they are due. Everyone has their particular opinions and I respect that. Thanks for the conversation kind sir. Keep up the good work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

stornn In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-13 02:34:28 +0000 UTC]

Okay then, enjoy your S2

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Earthkat In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 22:55:19 +0000 UTC]

its so simple and beautiful... great work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Earthkat [2004-07-10 16:12:54 +0000 UTC]

thank you very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Ohno-moment In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 21:22:46 +0000 UTC]

Very interesting shot. How come you didn't zoom in more on the bird?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to Ohno-moment [2004-07-08 21:55:27 +0000 UTC]

I didn't want to......

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

maiblossoms In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 17:35:40 +0000 UTC]

The simplicity of it is beautiful.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to maiblossoms [2004-07-08 19:45:06 +0000 UTC]

thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jmills74 In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 16:28:38 +0000 UTC]

inetersting image to say the least

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to jmills74 [2004-07-08 19:46:47 +0000 UTC]

thanks I guess. Is it interesting good or bad or indifferent?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jerseydevil018 In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 16:22:06 +0000 UTC]

veryvery nice +fav

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to jerseydevil018 [2004-07-08 19:47:28 +0000 UTC]

thank you veryvery much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bcphoto In reply to ??? [2004-07-08 15:18:26 +0000 UTC]

Very cool shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mrb24 In reply to bcphoto [2004-07-08 19:49:03 +0000 UTC]

you likey, thanky

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bcphoto In reply to mrb24 [2004-07-08 20:00:03 +0000 UTC]

I definitely likey!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0