HOME | DD

neserit — Beneath Heaven

Published: 2004-10-16 00:52:07 +0000 UTC; Views: 1055; Favourites: 9; Downloads: 74
Redirect to original
Description Yes, it has wings... you can all beat me now.

I love myths about fallen angels and the underappreciated angels. Many of the female angels were done away with or considered to be male or hermaphrodites, since the idea of women governing over us all must have frightened some theologists.
This one, I think, is a representation of all of those "lost" female angels.

Stock provided by:
Taylor Ross [link]

Brushes:
Related content
Comments: 33

ElegantAngel [2005-11-27 22:05:50 +0000 UTC]

This is really cool. I like the pose and the wings are awesome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to ElegantAngel [2005-11-27 22:09:39 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OilintheBlood [2004-11-13 03:49:14 +0000 UTC]

you just keep getting better and better

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to OilintheBlood [2004-11-13 22:16:41 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Endelva [2004-11-12 15:39:55 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful. Serene and magical...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Edgen22 [2004-11-02 03:47:03 +0000 UTC]

This is amazing... the softness makes it kind of dreamy. Those wings are beautiful as well!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

PoisonAlice [2004-10-23 19:03:14 +0000 UTC]

I love how the wings blend into the background. And the pose is interesting as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

EaterOfTheDead [2004-10-21 03:57:07 +0000 UTC]

She looks broken. Both physically and emotionaly. I love the imagery with her at the bottom and the bright void above her. She really looks fallen or rejected or lorded over.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

karyaazure [2004-10-17 06:00:32 +0000 UTC]

pretty... cool title... maybe blend the top

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

C4blessed [2004-10-16 22:22:33 +0000 UTC]

I believe my guardian angel is a female. So the picture don't bother me at all. I like it alot. I love the wings to. Pretty awesome work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

korpus [2004-10-16 20:09:46 +0000 UTC]

I really like how this one turned out. Nicely done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to korpus [2004-10-16 21:41:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

darthmarlan [2004-10-16 14:57:11 +0000 UTC]

Looks very cool, nice piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to darthmarlan [2004-10-16 18:56:20 +0000 UTC]

Thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DarkAwen [2004-10-16 09:45:24 +0000 UTC]

ARRRGGHHHHHHHH the damned wings return and what a damning piece of artwork :d when I said pretty I didn't mean this good !!!!!!Yes and its odd how if you look at most myths or stories through out the ages any powerful women were emasculated or created to appear haggard and unattractive,must have been the threat to their poor little male egos hun

A stunning angel made by a stunning soul stop stealing my favs slots



but next time are you going to pose naked with blood in a bath tub ???? and wheres is the pork chop and steak though ??? and I m disappointed by the total lack of sparkles

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to DarkAwen [2004-10-16 19:00:43 +0000 UTC]

I have to make a note of that. Pretty=not this good.

Oh, just about every goddess that was powerful seemed to change from a beautiful deity, to...well...something like Medusa. Like Athena was beautiful, but she had males aspects to her (hunting, her gender before birth), and became a virgin... I guess so that she never knew what is was to be a woman.
No more ranting for me!

I have to remember to do the naked, bloody bathtub thing!! I need 10,000 pageviews!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Invaech-Levh In reply to neserit [2004-10-16 21:36:14 +0000 UTC]

Poor Athena .. someone should go enlighten her in the full meaning of womanhood lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to Invaech-Levh [2004-10-16 21:40:21 +0000 UTC]

*points* I'm telling Saar again...unless you have more brides, that is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Invaech-Levh In reply to neserit [2004-10-16 21:42:07 +0000 UTC]

I said 'someone' .. never said I was gonna .. not really into those mythical godly types myself

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to Invaech-Levh [2004-10-16 21:43:05 +0000 UTC]

Hee hee, just messing with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Invaech-Levh [2004-10-16 09:34:06 +0000 UTC]

Wings rule!

Okay aside from that this is a great piece Nes Another one I 'd pick over almost you know who's whole gallery

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to Invaech-Levh [2004-10-16 19:01:26 +0000 UTC]

*lol* Glad to hear it, Zan! And even gladder that you like it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Crimzonarch [2004-10-16 08:01:26 +0000 UTC]

Wow, very awsome pose. Fits in really well with the backround. Damn.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to Crimzonarch [2004-10-16 19:01:47 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

angeloffire [2004-10-16 05:09:51 +0000 UTC]

wow! this ones just so pretty!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

johnnyi13 [2004-10-16 03:16:23 +0000 UTC]

another wonderful creation ..................... and by the way .... during Ruben's time everyone was "so Rubenesque" because the models were male and the female "attributes" were added at the end of the work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to johnnyi13 [2004-10-16 05:20:45 +0000 UTC]

I did not know thatt/ You just taught me something new. Unfortunately, I've lost the information that tells me how to open doors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

lockstock [2004-10-16 01:45:29 +0000 UTC]

LOL!!! I know I'll do some more winged people too... even though its so cliche. *can't help it!* HOWEVER... when its a well-done angel, such as yours, it is definitely a pleasure to behold. Its a piece of art with a message, a mood, a reason. And that makes all the difference in the world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to lockstock [2004-10-16 19:04:09 +0000 UTC]

Some winged people are good. I like how your winged pieces look. I do! It's badly cliched, but it works if the right people now how to use them.

Thank you for the comment...Certainly changes my mind about giving up and becoming a garbageman (err...woman?).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

lockstock In reply to neserit [2004-10-17 03:27:16 +0000 UTC]

garbagePERSON.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to lockstock [2004-10-17 05:40:54 +0000 UTC]

Ahhh, yes! Must remember that!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LostNSilence [2004-10-16 00:57:28 +0000 UTC]

this is beautiful work!!..what you had to say although I will have to disagree with you...i study theology and no where have i read that...where did you get information like that? I'm curious to know...however i do love the work!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

neserit In reply to LostNSilence [2004-10-16 01:01:06 +0000 UTC]

One of the books I have has studies done by some of the old fogies (Dionysis, especially) who argued about the sex of angels being either all male or hermaphrodites. One of the books that has it in there was Angels A to Z. I never studied much into theology, so I wasn't sure. Most of the angels that I did know as male are just now being re-examined and "proved" to be actually female... namely Gabriel.

I am still glad that you like the work however.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0