HOME | DD
Not-Think — Pregnancy
Published: 2011-03-18 20:53:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 3909; Favourites: 160; Downloads: 15
Redirect to original
Description
Want a sure fire way to stop that pesky foetus from forming? The answer is here! It's more effective than condoms, more foolproof than control!Related content
Comments: 177
Oh, and I believe the 30 percent failure rate comes from 'typical use' as stated within the document.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
you can also get pregnant via someone cumming on your pussy. [FYI lol]
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That would go under 'having sex' catagory XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
What kind of sex are you having?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Well just informing everyone lol. xP
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I suppose that depends upon your definition of best, personally i'd say contraception is a 'better' method of pregnancy prevention; since nobody is ever going to abstain till they want a kid, where as people will use contraception till they want a kid.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"since nobody is ever going to abstain till they want a kid"
Hello. I am an abstinent individual who has been as such for 19 years, and will be until I want a kid. How are you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It doesn't count if you're 19 years old.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sure it does. Saying it doesn't count is rather arbitrary, is it not? Especially since the vast majority of girls seem to have sex before age 19.
Thus, yes, I'm pretty sure it does count. Of course your going to say it doesn't, because you don't want to recognize that your statement was false.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
*groan* Technically my statement is false, as there are always outliers with all things; but that's the way assumptions work, they're based upon the gross majority not all cases inclusive. Being 19 doesn't matter, not because the majority of women become sexually active before that age (a statistic i'm dubious to recite), but because at age 19 the vast majority of people haven't decided to have children yet. You may be celibate for 19 years, but you have yet to break that celibacy for the expressed purpose of breeding, and by extrapolation of that notion once you've had children you stop having sex again too.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"You may be celibate for 19 years, but you have yet to break that celibacy for the expressed purpose of breeding, and by extrapolation of that notion once you've had children you stop having sex again too."
Then you make your conditions unscientific, and your claims ridiculous. How many people have you followed over the course of their entire lives, and asked them about their sex lives? My guess is, not nearly enough to draw any legitimate conclusions. Further, some people do start having sex again after children, especially when they get to the age where they cannot have children. Because it is an impossibility for them to have children, yet they have sex anyway, this would also count as being celibate.
So your conditions are not only questionable, your claims and assertions have yet to be proven by any scientific means. And you even admit that your absolute statement is flawed. And if some people can do it, that means all are quite capable of doing so as well. They simply choose not to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
"Because it is an impossibility for them to have children, yet they have sex anyway, this would also count as being celibate."
That is in incorrect definition of celibacy. Celibacy relies implicitly upon the absence of sexual intercourse, not upon the possibility of children.
"your claims and assertions have yet to be proven by any scientific means."
Honestly I feel expecting anyone to remain celibate till children, and once again after children (see the above correction to your definition of celibacy) for the entirety of their life is ludicrous, and doesn't really need to be proved henceforth.
"you even admit that your absolute statement is flawed."
If you wish to interpret it that way, sure, but I actually only established that it was a generalisation, and not an absolute statement.
"And if some people can do it, that means all are quite capable of doing so as well."
That's not necessarily true either, and now you're making evidence-less absolute statements.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Contraceptives have a fail rate of 2-30%
If you don't have sex, you don't get pregnant, simple as that. (Seeing as there has yet to be a confirmed case of parthenogenesis in humans) That's the idea behind this stamp- nothing else
More than anything it a statement for the people how sleep around and don't expect anything to happen because of it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Mmmm, as long as you're not preaching the american psyco-babble about abstaining till marriage I shall concede to your point.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No, not at all. This is simple cause and effect. If you sleep around, something IS going to happen- be it pregnancy, STDs, heartbreak- we don't live in a risk free world. There are consequences to actions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Apparently it's not that obvious. OTL
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Or you could just take it up the ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Never thought about that XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It could still leak down
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I’m surprised some people don’t know this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
<= Prev |