HOME | DD

SagaFata In reply to KitsuneMuffin [2016-03-23 08:00:28 +0000 UTC]

transpeople: mad we won't play pretend with them since forever and ever.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Otonoji In reply to KitsuneMuffin [2014-12-11 18:52:32 +0000 UTC]

I have worked as a Special Education teacher for 8 years now. I have seen a kid steal a used diaper from another and using it to paint cows on the walls. I have witnessed a down syndrome kid trying to copulate with a gym sneaker. A student of mine once gave me a birthday card with only the word "Finger" written on it. I once even had to go to the hospital with a kid because he almost drowned due to the complexity of the task of swallowing his own saliva. However, I've never seen anything as retarded as your comment.

Now, this may be super secret information I am about to spill, but I hacked the CERN database and found out that humans are always (save for a tiny tiny tiny percentage) born with either one of two biological genders! *Gasp!* I have consulted with a number of scholars and even a wizard, and they all agree that the artist that made the tutorial was probably referring to this theoretical biological gender, probably due to the use of the word "Anatomy" (the wizard pointed this out, i'm glad I consulted with him). After a brief chat with Stephen Hawking, he formulated the hypothesis that one can have whatever the perceived gender one has, that this fabled biological gender will be either female or male! (but keep in mind, this is just wild conjecture). He even dared to theorize that "female anatomy" therefore is characterized by, among other things, the presence of breasts and a vagina (hey! like you said!), either from birth or made by surgery, regardless of the individual's identification as male, female, or a lawn chair!

To confirm this wasn't just ravings from a mind brought to lunacy by years of confinement in a wheelchair, I contacted the head of Harvard's research division, and not only did he confirmed it all (yes, i was also flabbergasted), he even suggested that the artist didn't take into account all the gender identities one can have in his rude, rude, disrespectful use of the phrase "female anatomy", because his mind was probably occupied with that "being reasonable" thing I keep hearing about.

But I agree on your point that this is a nice tutorial.

👍: 1 ⏩: 2

KitsuneMuffin In reply to Otonoji [2015-01-08 12:59:17 +0000 UTC]

Wow you must be the most horrible special education teacher, not only because you use the word "retard" as a negative adjective but your whole argument is to humiliate me (or at least try).
Come with some facts next time and some arguments would probably be good to.

It is transexcluding to say "female anatomy" because by that you mean that there is a special anatomy for females, which there isn't. You can me born with a penis but still identify as female and you can be born a vagina and identify as neither female or male (or both even).

And I don't give a single fuck what you "think" the artist thought. I would like to hear that from the artist themselves, not from some idiot claiming to be a special ed. teacher.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Otonoji In reply to KitsuneMuffin [2015-01-25 01:43:27 +0000 UTC]

Of course I'm not a special ed. teacher, it was just a theatrical build up to call you retarded. Or did you also thought I really spoke with Stephen Hawking?｡◕‿◕｡
That being said, If you read my (in my opinion) awesome reply carefully, you will notice I never said that you couldn't identify with another gender, I just said that it has nothing to do with this tutorial.
Between my overly sarcastic comment, there were quite some arguments. I'll repeat them in a clear fashion:

-"Female Anatomy" is being used to refer to people that have breasts (That's the "anatomy" part) like a Female , regardless of the gender they identify with, because for the purpose of this tutorial that is  ✿❤⃛☆Fucking Irrelevant☆❤⃛✿!

- Within reason, you can't ask someone to not use the word Female when they are talking about the breasts of a woman. That's just, again, (and I'm using this adjective with the most negativity I can muster)  ✲*☆Retarded✲*☆

BONUS ROUND:
Words and phrases  that are "transexcluding", by your logic (and suggestions to improve them!):

-Manboobs (ShameSacks)
-Female/Male Reproductive Tract (PeeSpermBabyFreeway)
-Gynecologist (CaveExplorer)
-MANchester United (Kicky-kicky-Goal-and-Tea)
-Ladies and Gentleman (Y'all)
- Zoey Deschanel's band "She and Him" ("I'm not Katy Perry")

And do you really want to live in a world where you can't say "Manboobs"? I thought so.

Ah, you are fun! I like you!

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

KitsuneMuffin In reply to Otonoji [2015-03-24 17:43:54 +0000 UTC]

Hey there again, almost forgot about you, little friend. It's hard to imagine that you actually think you make good arguments. Let me give you a few tips on how to sound smart and not like a 12 year old boy who thinks he is soo smart.
- Don't try to make fun of people or call them things like "retard" it's a quick ride to "I have absolutley no idea what to say so I'm just going to insult you"-town.
- Don't argue about something you have no idea about. And don't talk about trans-issues when you are cis (If you don't know what cis is, then that's another reason why you shouldn't open your mouth)

And again, YOU should be the one reading my comment clearer. What I'm saying is that there is no such thing as a "one and only" female body.
You can be born with a penis and a flat chest and still be female. And that's not what this tutorial shows, it shows a cis-female as the "all female" body. Which is transexcluding. And what you're saying is also transexcluding, if you are born with a vagina and breasts, but identifies as male, you are still male and you _do not_ have a "female anatomy" you have a _MALE_ anatomy because that's what you are. A male.

You obviously have no idea what trans is or even demi-identities or cis. Go read a book and come back when you have real arguments based on facts about transexuality.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Otonoji In reply to KitsuneMuffin [2015-03-25 14:30:52 +0000 UTC]

Ahahah this is hilarious!

Again, you retarded creature, what i'm saying is that the subject of trans/cis/sexuality is irrelevant to this tutorial. I'm not denying it's a thing, I'm just saying that what you did (informing an artist that's talking about the female anatomy about trans issues just because you are a retarded social justice warrior) is uncalled for. 

And being cis has nothing to do with me giving my opinion on the usefulness of your comment (hint: none at all). That's like saying a person of race X cant have an opinion on race Y. OH WAIT! I bet you think they cant! Cultural appropriation, right? 

Go back to tumblr, this is deviantart you 15 year old. Your only arguments are lecturing about gender identities instead of fucking thinking for yourself.
You are a special snowflake indeed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

firebrony101 In reply to Otonoji [2015-12-18 06:54:46 +0000 UTC]

I think he was just confusing gender with sex.as well as being a useless SJW

Gender: what you think of and identify as, this also ties into sexual orientation.

Sex: what you are born as, e.g. Male/Female boy/girl, Anatomy

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nexusrightsi In reply to Otonoji [2015-01-02 21:26:42 +0000 UTC]

Amen, can this person get an Hallelujah please!?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0