HOME | DD

PatGoltz β€” Embroidered

Published: 2006-05-28 03:18:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 419; Favourites: 18; Downloads: 51
Redirect to original
Description Made in Apophysis. Derived from a flame by Thank you!
Related content
Comments: 43

Manshi [2006-06-25 13:49:32 +0000 UTC]

I never comment on fractals because I don't understand them and I don't like leaving trivial comments, but this particular one has a beauty that though I still can't understand I can feel. Maybe it's the jewel-like quality or the organic feel, but I like it ^^

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to Manshi [2006-06-26 06:11:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much! People don't have to understand fractals to appreciate them.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

beetum [2006-06-15 02:19:01 +0000 UTC]

this is very awesome and unique..... i hate the words i used but it fits perfectly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to beetum [2006-06-15 14:36:41 +0000 UTC]

That's perfectly OK. Cliche is fine. Thanks for the kind words. And thanks for the fav, too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

patrx [2006-06-01 22:37:00 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful!! It reminds me of looking face to face with a jewelled spider....in a way. Love the colors. How did you get such a complex flame??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-02 13:29:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! I pull triangles a lot. Certain things lend themselves to that, and other things don't. This one actually started out as a much simpler flame, and I played with it a lot, and that's what I came up with. Thanks for the fav's!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-02 15:03:56 +0000 UTC]

I'm going to have to bum a copy of some parameter files to see what things look like when you get some of these images. I'm one of those ''show me'' types when it comes to things like this. One fellow mentioned a variety of 'variations' that were used in one of his, but try as I might, I sure couldn't find anything like his image. LOL I hated it when they removed the diagonal movement buttons from the edit window. Moving up/down, left/right doesn't always produce the same effect as a diagonal move.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-03 09:35:04 +0000 UTC]

Not sure what you're getting at when you say you will have to burn a copy of some parameter files. You mean on a CDrom? The files are small. Just stick them on your hard disk. As far as the movement buttons are concerned, I never used them anyway, so I don't miss them. I always tugged the triangle where I wanted it. Then they messed with one of the vertices, and I disovered tugging on it made the whole triangle move. Someone had to tell me how to disable that. But one neat thing about the new Apo is that you can drag triangle sides, and you can rotate them. So there are some nice new features. But I can't render in strips anymore, because that's broken. The way I figure it is that the renderer in the old version worked fine, and I follow the maxim, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-03 21:01:36 +0000 UTC]

I said bum not burn a copy...LOL ...like beg, borrow or steal type bumming...LOL I always have trouble with the R-M combos in the lower case, depending upon the fonts used. The movement buttons give me a lot better control than I have with the mouse...it's that time lag thing waiting for the triangle to follow the mouse cursor. I liked that diagonal move button which gave me precise control in those directions. At least I have the grid patterns for moving up/down & left/right when dragging.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-04 14:25:05 +0000 UTC]

Ah! Well, that explains it. I have trouble telling m from rn sometimes. They look so similar and the print on my monitor is very small.

Since I never got used to the movement arrows, I don't miss 'em.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-04 21:19:15 +0000 UTC]

With this font, even under the magnifier that I have on my machine for reading fine type, it is still hard to separate the r & n.....it still almost looks like an ''m'' when one glances at the words.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-05 07:00:27 +0000 UTC]

That's my problem exactly. I can see fine detail, but the "rn" still looks the same as the "m". I think they goofed when they designed the font. They should have made the "r" just a little shorter on the right. They didn't make it for these detailed screens.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-05 13:42:51 +0000 UTC]

It's not bad when the type face is enlarged, which spreads the space between letters. But, at this point size, I can't discern between the two combos as you had in your note. I always use the ''Book Antiqua" font in my emails or the ''Times New Roman''. They're a lot more readable.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-06 10:14:48 +0000 UTC]

I actually like the san serif fonts better, but this one just has that one problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-06 15:55:15 +0000 UTC]

Some are easier to read, I guess. Working in the newspaper, back when type was still set manually, one kind of appreciates type faces. Sometimes I actually miss the smells of the pressroom....and setting rooms...ink, oil, and hot lead. But, I don't miss the heat from the lead pots and the pressplate molds. It could be dangerous, too, if one got any water near that hot lead.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-07 07:08:44 +0000 UTC]

Fascinating! I do appreciate type faces. I have quite a collection of them. I also have a bunch of foreign alphabet and character fonts. So you were a linotypesetter? I remember here years ago that the linotype workers went on strike, so the newspaper replaced them with computers.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-07 14:27:24 +0000 UTC]

No, but I used to hang around the typesetting rooms while waiting for the presses to start. I delivered the news stands while in junior high and then graduated to working in the morgue, cleaning and filing the pix plates that were used on the press plates. I also did some of the picture etching on plastic plates for the press. When I started, dad was the editor and I worked at the paper until a year after it had been sold to a competitor. I also could make an extra couple bucks unloading the papers from the press, some days if they had a heavy run. Hot work...LOL

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-08 11:19:37 +0000 UTC]

Interesting background! I don't think I would have wanted to do it, though. But the morgue would be an interesting place. Also, it's a darn good thing I didn't breathe the stuff there. I'm bad enough off as it is!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-08 13:50:32 +0000 UTC]

The morgue in a newspaper is a place where they file pix of people that have appeared in the news and bios on important people who may appear in the news so if a personality dies, they can have something ready for print. The only smells would probably be old paper and dust and ink. I found a bio of an interesting fellow that was one of the first indian agents here in NoDak when I was updating the index files. He also authored a couple of books, one being titled: "My Friend the Indian". He recounted one of the prominant Sioux indian chiefs, I can't remember his name now but not Sitting Bull, who wanted to trade all his horses for McLaughlin's wife, because of her blonde hair. LOL I enjoyed reading the book...quite interesting. He later took an indian wife after his first wife passed away.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-09 08:34:52 +0000 UTC]

I am indeed aware of what the morgue is. I think it sounds like a fascinating place! Interesting story you told, too!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-09 14:25:49 +0000 UTC]

I guess I misunderstood your earlier reply. I enjoyed going through the old newspapers that they had in big books stored on shelves in the mail room at the paper. One needed a ladder to reach a lot of them. I think the papers went back to 1881 or so. I was saddened when the paper went belly up after the new owners bought it. It upset dad and a lot of the workers when they heard of the sale after the fact. And dad was one of the first casualties of the turnover. A lot of the workers and dad would have liked to have had a chance to buy it, as they really didn't like the new owners and their policies. I think I only stayed on another year, myself. A lot of the copy and typesetters went to work for the competition in Bismarck. There was quite a turnover of personnel. But, I can take credit for scooping the competition on reporting the Good Friday quake that hit Alaska....when I was just hanging around the office waiting for the paper to go to press when the first reports started coming in on the Teletype.....it was "stop the presses'' and they tore out the front page plates and re-did them to announce the quake. I think we were delayed about another hour or so before getting the paper out. I guess I lucked out in that the editor was getting ready to call it quits for the day when I called his attention to the TTY reports coming in from the AP. It was nice to the linotype operators because the reports were punched onto rolls of paper tape which they could feed into the linotype and the type was set quickly. That was a pretty fast page change, that's for sure.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-10 09:03:19 +0000 UTC]

It's too bad what happened to the newspaper. I've gotten sort of used to the idea that nothing is forever, at least not in this life.

Neat on your scoop. Too bad you weren't a reporter, eh? Those things do happen, and newspapers do a remarkable job when they do. Good it was caught before the paper was put to bed.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

patrx In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-10 15:05:20 +0000 UTC]

Yup.. Pat Phillips, cub reporter....LOL Another 5 minutes and the presses would have been rolling. The technology of the presses has sure changed since then...from the old lead castings to the new offset where the plates are etched on aluminum sheets, like a photograph negative.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

patrx In reply to patrx [2006-06-11 17:17:43 +0000 UTC]

At least that's what the local paper here used to use...9mil thick aluminum sheets. I bought about 50 of them with the intention of making a solar collector for heat, but never got around to it. It was a bit out of my league when it came to trying to build the cases...too heavy for me to move and cut the wood.and glass.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

PatGoltz In reply to patrx [2006-06-11 12:45:29 +0000 UTC]

Ah, yes! Is aluminum what they use these days?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Thelma1 [2006-05-30 11:10:03 +0000 UTC]

Wow, fabulous colours in this one, it's wonderful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to Thelma1 [2006-06-01 13:01:32 +0000 UTC]

Thanks very much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Thelma1 In reply to PatGoltz [2006-06-02 10:44:53 +0000 UTC]

You're very welcome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

unicorngraphics [2006-05-28 18:51:27 +0000 UTC]

Klasse Farben,sehr schΓΆnes Design!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to unicorngraphics [2006-05-29 04:47:04 +0000 UTC]

Danke schΓΆn!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ellygator [2006-05-28 17:48:45 +0000 UTC]

Love the colors and sharp, crisp details!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to Ellygator [2006-05-29 04:44:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and thanks for the fav!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

pandalf [2006-05-28 17:09:58 +0000 UTC]

Very beautiful these last fractals!!!! .

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to pandalf [2006-05-29 04:55:01 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and thanks for all the fav's!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

pandalf In reply to PatGoltz [2006-05-29 09:01:07 +0000 UTC]

my pleasure Pat !

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Mithgariel [2006-05-28 11:58:45 +0000 UTC]

Mmmm...really beautiful. Especially the colors.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to Mithgariel [2006-05-29 05:09:29 +0000 UTC]

Thanks so much!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ClaireJones [2006-05-28 09:09:03 +0000 UTC]

Awesome render.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to ClaireJones [2006-05-28 09:55:46 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, and thanks for the fav!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Raventhird [2006-05-28 08:54:39 +0000 UTC]

That's the better one, I think. The colours are great.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to Raventhird [2006-05-28 09:56:26 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much! You are probably right.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wilder3 [2006-05-28 07:00:54 +0000 UTC]

Very nice like the gradient alot sort of an underwater gradient.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PatGoltz In reply to wilder3 [2006-05-28 08:09:42 +0000 UTC]

It reminds me of underwater, too. Thank you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0