HOME | DD

PeterLime β€” Innocent or Seductive II ?

Published: 2010-02-12 14:38:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 2390; Favourites: 40; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Innocent or Seductive?

What's your opinion?





Model: Annie


Taken in Lisbon, Portugal





Copyright Β© Peter Lime
2008 All rights reserved
My photos are not stock and can't be reproduced without my written permission
Related content
Comments: 38

JesseRevenga [2010-02-15 07:53:39 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I would say that it is seductive. Innocent, to me, you would have to add glasses, maybe a bun or something like that. I definitely see the seductive side more than the innocent. I like the boarder, it gives it more of a pin-up model type of feel, kinda like i would see it as a post card while traveling in the rural west. I definitely like the red on red on the legs. To me, it could use more of a smile instead of a serious face, that would lead me to think more along of the seductive/innocent side, which, to me, seems to be what you were going for. All in all i think that its a nice shot.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to JesseRevenga [2010-02-18 21:01:39 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Jesse for your nice critique!

Yes, seductive ... perhaps a litle bit defiant ...

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ArtistInAndOut [2010-02-15 00:24:50 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I believe you and she were able to conquer both with this shot, Peter. Of course her beauty and the sense of always wanting to see more is causing the mind to find seduction in the photograph. Her sensual looking legs, her sexy outfit, yet proving you can still make a gorgeous shot without total nudity, lol... Yet her facial expression and pose has its own sense of... "I'm just sitting around thinking, may I help you with something?" You've managed to put a little of both into it in my opinion. Great Job, needless to say (because you're always at it!) keep up that good work.

-Justin

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to ArtistInAndOut [2010-02-18 20:59:38 +0000 UTC]

Justin, first of all thank you very much for your critique. I don't have to much ...

That's a fact that no nudity is needed for a sexy image, but for me this is the exception, this kind of photos and specially indoor.

I'm very happy with your analisys my friend

Thanks again

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fonecard [2010-08-12 16:32:57 +0000 UTC]

I'd have to say...a little (or a lot) of both!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to fonecard [2010-08-12 16:36:15 +0000 UTC]

Hehehe Ric, I guess you are right!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

fonecard In reply to PeterLime [2010-08-12 17:17:21 +0000 UTC]

Besides...who'd want one over the other anyway??

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Possemaster [2010-02-21 20:41:29 +0000 UTC]

Why not both?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to Possemaster [2010-02-22 18:43:44 +0000 UTC]

Good question!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

suharyadhie [2010-02-15 08:03:37 +0000 UTC]

hello

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to suharyadhie [2010-02-15 15:38:17 +0000 UTC]

Hello my friend! Welcome to DA

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Topo1958 [2010-02-13 13:40:14 +0000 UTC]

Seductively innocent, hehe

PS: never trust: always seductive... innocent? uhmmmm... Maybe when the Hell freezes

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to Topo1958 [2010-02-18 13:07:26 +0000 UTC]

hehehe Juan Carlos, it's a good definition!

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

almadepoeta [2010-02-12 18:43:36 +0000 UTC]

Maravilhosa! Como sempre...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to almadepoeta [2010-02-17 21:46:09 +0000 UTC]

eheheh ... obrigado caro Homero!

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

baresi88 [2010-02-12 18:35:15 +0000 UTC]

NΓ£o sei qual mais algum comentΓ‘rio nΓ£o tenhas gostado, sinceramente este que nΓ£o gostas-te em parte nΓ£o me saiu nada bem e peΓ§o desculpa a ambos. Mas eu nΓ£o quero, nem nunca quis dizer que vocΓͺs nΓ£o sΓ£o profissionais.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to baresi88 [2010-02-17 22:27:10 +0000 UTC]

NP

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

baresi88 [2010-02-12 16:18:46 +0000 UTC]

sedutora e sexy, inocente sΓ³ se for para parecer... nΓ£o gosto do fundo verde.
abraΓ§o.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to baresi88 [2010-02-12 16:27:17 +0000 UTC]

Pedro, aviso sΓ³ que nΓ£o estou a gostar deste tipo de comentΓ‘rios. A Annie merece todo o meu respeito, e sendo bastante profissional e expressiva tenta fazer o melhor que se lhe pede.

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

RAlife [2010-02-12 15:53:36 +0000 UTC]

great composition... the red lips and stocking/shoe. awesome

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to RAlife [2010-02-18 13:06:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks Ricardo for your nice appreciation!

Peter

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

RAlife In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-18 14:24:33 +0000 UTC]

anytime Pete.... great work

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to RAlife [2010-02-19 17:20:09 +0000 UTC]

TY

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Claudia-R [2010-02-12 15:12:42 +0000 UTC]

sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to Claudia-R [2010-02-17 21:47:37 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Claudia-R In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-17 21:53:58 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

marcelo80 [2010-02-12 14:45:28 +0000 UTC]

mmmm.....very!!!!!!!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to marcelo80 [2010-02-17 21:47:55 +0000 UTC]

very ... what????

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

marcelo80 In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-18 13:52:53 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to marcelo80 [2010-02-18 13:53:57 +0000 UTC]

I see, I see ...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

marcelo80 In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-18 14:01:43 +0000 UTC]

jajaja =^_^=

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

deaconfrost78 [2010-02-12 14:42:53 +0000 UTC]

I vote for seductiv IΒ΄m sure she is

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to deaconfrost78 [2010-02-17 22:22:30 +0000 UTC]

I think you are right!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

deaconfrost78 In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-18 17:09:13 +0000 UTC]

Really? Did you prove it?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to deaconfrost78 [2010-02-19 17:18:33 +0000 UTC]

No ... just my feelings!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

deaconfrost78 In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-20 12:22:28 +0000 UTC]

Ok so they weΒ΄re mine, too

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PeterLime In reply to deaconfrost78 [2010-02-22 18:48:55 +0000 UTC]

we're even then!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

deaconfrost78 In reply to PeterLime [2010-02-23 22:06:45 +0000 UTC]

Right

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0