HOME | DD
Plowplot β Must Repeal Obamacare 55th time
#republicans #tedcruz
Published: 2015-10-26 18:40:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 298; Favourites: 8; Downloads: 1
Redirect to original
Description
A group of Republican extremists have joined the democrats in the senate promising to reject the 55th attempt to gut the ACA. Not because reason or logic nor good governance prevailed, but because ripping Obamacare apart isn't good enough for some republicans.They want a complete removal of healthcare from Americans or they will reject the bill. It's either complete destruction for American families or nothing!
Gooooo Republicans!
Related content
Comments: 12
Repealing Obamacare is not the same as complete removal of healthcare from Americans.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, you're right, it wouldn't remove insurance from ALL Americans.
It would only remove the insurance of 17.65 million people.
Fuck those people, right? They should have pulled themselves up by their bootstraps!
π: 0 β©: 1
Making up numbers again.
What about the people who don't have health insurance under Obamacare? Fuck those people, right?
What about Obamacare double-digit rate increases for nearly 1 out of every 3 Obamacare plans that will be sold on HealthCare.gov for 2016.Β Fuck those people, right?
www.cnbc.com/2015/09/04/obamacβ¦
Repeal and Replace Obamacare
π: 0 β©: 1
Re: "What about the people who don't have health insurance under Obamacare?"
Then wouldn't repealing Obamacare not affect them at all, either way?
Also, you gotta stop listening to Trump. He blows things way out of proportion.
Yes, some of the premium health insurance plans in some states will go up if those states approve it. That article you posted is what the insurance companies are *ASKING* for not what is actually happening. They have to get approval for anything more than a 10% increase in any plan as part of Obamacare. So if your state jacks up the price it's because your state politicians have been bought.
Those plans which are even eligible to be jacked up are the 'Premium' plans which are used by less then 7% of the people enrolled in Obamacare. The rest of the plans have price gouging protection built into the program.
The "Silver" plan used by 68% of people under the ACA will have a 4.4% increase. Before Obamacare there was a 13-14% increase every year for nine ears in a row.
So for 68% of Americans they are saving money and in addition, the subsidies for the Silver plan and all the plans below it will be increased so they will save even more money even getting tax credits.
At the low end of the spectrum the plans that give the least amount of coverage will actually decrease by 10.4% in some states.
Source: www.politifact.com/truth-o-metβ¦
But go on, keep telling people how bad Obamacare is for them. Maybe the Republicans will manage to take it away and then you'll learn the hard way how much money it's saving people then the insurance companies jack up the price on everything because they have no regulation to stop them.
π: 0 β©: 1
So fuck'em
I listen to Dr Ben Carson maybe you should too.
Insurance companies love Obamacare.
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah, there is your problem. He's the black Trump. That's why he is second most popular with Republicans because he is just as fucking wacko as Trump but he's also religious.
π: 0 β©: 1
He is leading in some polls now.
π: 0 β©: 1
Being the leader of a race full of insane people still means he's insane and no republican has a chance of winning against Hillary. The best thing Republicans could do to win the presidency is get Bernie Sanders nominated. Otherwise they have zero chance.
π: 0 β©: 0
What does it say that they have supporters in the American Electorate?
π: 0 β©: 0
Obama : "no religion is responsible for terrorism", "the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of islam", "america negotiates with terrorists"
Trying to find logic in Democrat politics is like trying to get petrol from your water tap.
π: 0 β©: 1
- No religion is responsible for terrorism
No religion is, the nutjobs in the religion are. The majority of people in every religion are peaceful, ignorant, sheep who don't want to think for themselves. Terrorists use religion as an excuse to be terrorists just like African rape gangs rally around rape to get together and be horrible people. Horrible people will always be horrible, what they rally around doesn't create them. They were already evil.
- The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.
Is it wrong to say that we shouldn't reward people who just claim all of Islam is evil?
- America negotiates with terrorists
Yes, if families want to pay the ransom to have their family released from a terrorist Obama changed the rules so that the families won't be stopped from paying... Do you think that's wrong? Should we stop them from paying for their family's safety? If the government negotiates on the behalf of the family they are much more likely to get their family member back alive. America isn't giving them anything, it's the families giving the terrorists money, and the military making sure they get their family back in exchange for that money. I'm personally OK with that.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm sorry but i'll have to disagree.
The Inquisition and the Islamic conquests were purely the epitome of religious terrorism....if the nutjobs want to kill people, they don't necessarily have to use religion at all, we can see Stalin and Pol Pot and Mao doing all the crazy shit they wanted, why didnt they use religion as an excuse?
Religion is an ideology which cannot be questioned or criticized, such ideologies are indeed responsible for driving people crazy and making them do terrible things.Β
Ideologies have agendas, we can see in communist nations the aristocratic class getting battered, same applies for religion where non-belivers of that relgion getting battered.
we can see if the people in ISIS were just some nutjobs, then they would do all kinds of crazy things, but instead we see that they do only things what their religion commands them to do, nothing more, nothing less.
I never said that people who do that should be rewarded, in this case of the prophet, saying anything about him is considered slander, because there is no such good deed that he has ever done imo....why is it that people are allowed to slander hitler and stalin while they are not allowed to speak the truth about a perverted mass murdering religious prophet?
that is purely suppression of free speech, and by that what he said is the future does not belong to poeple who wish free speech.
Trading 5 terrorist for 1 american desrter is clearly "america negotiating" with terrorists
www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articβ¦
π: 0 β©: 0