HOME | DD

pnutink — roy with bg

Published: 2008-08-12 15:23:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 8570; Favourites: 103; Downloads: 115
Redirect to original
Description with background.
Related content
Comments: 21

crashnspin [2009-12-13 08:45:53 +0000 UTC]

didn't his blade have a slight orange tinge to it?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Iisan [2009-03-15 20:27:10 +0000 UTC]

some of the least 'generic' works of nintendo characters I've seen

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pnutink In reply to Iisan [2009-03-15 23:18:27 +0000 UTC]

thank you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NightmareoTwilight [2009-01-25 19:25:01 +0000 UTC]

I love the huge argument but i have to say "theburdislost54" is a complete moron, if you have negitive thoughts keep them to yourself no one like s an asshole who bickers all the damn time.

The sword is thicker which shows it true power.
I love your art style expecially on Ike very awesome

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pnutink In reply to NightmareoTwilight [2009-01-25 22:09:43 +0000 UTC]

yeah it got quite annoying.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Serras-Kai [2009-01-05 06:15:08 +0000 UTC]

It's good to see that not everyone has forgotten about Roy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FireFleaSan [2008-12-21 13:51:27 +0000 UTC]

That is an EPIC Roy. I never liked Roy in the game cause he always kicked my ass >.> But I like this, you made him look totally wicked.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thebirdislost54 [2008-11-21 22:41:49 +0000 UTC]

That's at the thing about your drawings. That they are a bit to ... Generic.

This looks little like Roy, If you where to add in an extra shoulder trim, and remove the headband, this could be labeled Mercenary, or just Solider.

His face is wrong also, but that's just your drawing style.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pnutink In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-11-21 23:43:38 +0000 UTC]

generic?

i think the original nintendo character roy is generic. when i sat down and drew roy, along with all the other characters, i drew it how i wanted them to look, not specifically to how they already look. when you say "his face is wrong" it's telling me that you really aren't seeing my art for what it is and looking at much more critically. his face is not wrong, i did his face with intentions of making him look a bit older and masculine because roy and marth both look like girls.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

thebirdislost54 In reply to pnutink [2008-11-24 01:20:28 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry, next time, I'll take it as a "style" when it looks wrong, I'll also remember to look at art for "what it is" and not criticize on what the tittle and name says.

If you want to incorporate so much of your drawing style, then say it's based off Roy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pnutink In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-11-24 20:57:24 +0000 UTC]

i don't really have to say anything, i don't really have to explain detail by detail why something doesn't look the way you want it to look. i made something they way i wanted it to look and you should get over it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebirdislost54 In reply to pnutink [2008-11-24 22:39:00 +0000 UTC]

Somewhere there's a line where a correct color scheme, isn't enough to make something, somebody. You've more than passed that line is what I'm saying. If you want me to go in "detail by detail" on just how much this isn't Roy, then I gladly will.

What I'm saying is that you've completely ignored all of Roy's bodily features (That sounds weird.) except his hair. I mean, there are some part's you can change drastically if you want to, but the face is defiantly not one of those parts.

I really don't have the time to argue on why this isn't Roy. Nor, am I willing to admit that this is Roy. I mean look at this: [link] -The head matters.

By the way, I'm not saying this is bad, this is very, very good, just not Roy.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FireFleaSan In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-12-21 13:49:29 +0000 UTC]

Pardon me for instruding but you obviously didn't draw this, so who are you to say that it isn't Roy? It sure looks like Roy to me. You have a right to critique, but not JUDGE people's artwork simple because that YOU find it doesn't look like what you wanted. The artist obviously drew it as Roy, multiple people think it looks like Roy....So please don't import your opinion when it's not exactly needed, as far as beyond critiquing. I can easily say the same thing about your artwork, that it looks nothing like the original, "you passed the line" crap.

A peice of work does NOT have to look EXACTLY like the original to be the same thing. Please understand that for next time.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebirdislost54 In reply to FireFleaSan [2008-12-29 17:47:28 +0000 UTC]

Of all things, I'm pretty sure that this argument ended. And I shall have my Input negative or positive. I assume that the comment about my artwork is just a wild guess, All of my artwork is original based off of nothing.

I wasn't saying that it had to look exactly like the same thing, I just say that it at least have a quality, other than color, that looks like Roy.

Honestly, you're talking about something that happened a month ago, do you really think I still care?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FireFleaSan In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-12-30 15:42:04 +0000 UTC]

Well, I suggest you shouldn't start an arguement in the first place or make that negative comment because it doesn't go away. It can be picked up anytime. It's your fault for that, so maybe you'll learn this for next time. Good day

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebirdislost54 In reply to FireFleaSan [2008-12-30 17:54:25 +0000 UTC]

Yes I'll do that, and next time I suggest you read the date posted to see if anyone will really care.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FireFleaSan In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-12-30 20:00:49 +0000 UTC]

You still posted it in the first place!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

thebirdislost54 In reply to FireFleaSan [2008-12-31 17:18:39 +0000 UTC]

Eh? Me confused, look can we just end this argument, I never said that it was a bad piece of art, on the contrary I think that it's very good, I just link It doesn't portray Roy well. Gah, having such a large argument already takes away from the piece.

Hey, at least I SAID what I didn't like, rather than going "This totally sucks."

Hey if you still wanna argue then PM me, I'm tired of this item.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

thebirdislost54 In reply to pnutink [2008-11-24 00:47:17 +0000 UTC]

They don't look like girls, maybe Marth, but I can't see Roy as a girl, where did you get that idea? If you were going for a girl, I'm sorry to say your Roy drawing failed in that criteria.

His face is also elfish, what's with the ears and nose?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

pnutink In reply to thebirdislost54 [2008-11-24 20:50:15 +0000 UTC]

i think the anime look on them is much more feminine, that's all. and i didn't say i was going for a feminine look, i said the opposite of that. which is telling me you aren't really reading what i wrote.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

rosutu [2008-09-01 16:43:00 +0000 UTC]

Roy seems... sneaky. Nicely done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0